Home WPGA
Your notes are welcome:
Lift@worldparaglidingassociation.org
Most recent
edit of this page:
Saturday, 03 December 2011
Research tips re: paragliding |
Alternative spellings for paragliding core terms
|
False statements (FS) in the paragliding literature: (Send false statements with solid counterexamples.)
|
Working:
|
PG terms
|
|
Public news articles telling of PG accidents and
fatalities (NOT COMPLETE) Send links to WPGA. [[ For a more
complete collection better organized, see the unequalled work at |
Disambiguation: Paraglider
|
Slots
|
Since paragliders are gliding kites, then thorough understanding of kiting
principles forms a strong foundation for being a pilot of gliding kites.
Gliding kites with human aboard brings the human to meet the vagaries of
launch zones and landing zones which cannot be perfectly predicted.
|
|
Human-carrying sport and recreation paragliderParaglider, the personNoteworthy flying sites for sport paraglidersPractical applications using paragliderOther
Noteworthy persons dying from use of paraglider
|
Let us know you and your interests. Add to the glossary!
News, notes, documents, files:
editor@worldparaglidingassociation.org
~~World Paragliding
Association~~
~~Kite Energy Community~~
Talk: Bruce
Goldsmith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Speedy Tag
I don't normally do sport, but IMHO the 2007 Paragliding World Champion is
notable, so does anyone object if I remove the speedy tag? WereSpielChequers 15:04,
28 January 2009 (UTC)
I created this page, and intend to expand it soon.
I contend that Bruce Goldsmith is a notable person, as the world champion
of paragliding in 2007. World champions in other sports, even much more
obscure ones,
have Wikipedia articles about them; for example Vidar Benjaminsen the
ski-orienteering champion, or Lita dela Rosa who won the Bowling World Cup
in 1978.
Goldsmith is also notable as a rare example of a person who won a sporting
world championship using equipment that he designed himself.Manormadman (talk)
15:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Query How many 2007 world Paraglider champions were there? [2007] WereSpielChequers 15:13,
28 January 2009 (UTC)
Only one. Some confusion might arise because there is a Paragliding World
Championship every two years - a single event at one location,
consisting of a number of daily legs, producing an overall winner. This is
what Goldsmith won. However, there is also every year the Paragliding
World Cup.
The winner of this is the pilot who does best in a series of events over
the year at various locations. You might compare the former format to the
Tour de France; and the latter to the Formula One championship.Manormadman (talk)
15:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks that makes sense, the link I found was to the 2007 World Cup. WereSpielChequers 16:51,
28 January 2009 (UTC)
Tag now removed, I will try to add some more stuff on this article. refs
e.t.c ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Sailor
There's also a Bruce Goldsmith who sailed for the US in 1969. Currently he
is only a redlink from List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard
classes)
and I've shifted him from pointing here to Bruce Goldsmith (sailor).
Obviously if someone creates that article we can have a note at the top of
this one,
but in the meantime I'm making a note on this talk page. WereSpielChequers 19:14,
28 January 2009 (UTC)
comment from Bruce Goldsmith
I would like to propose this update to my biography which is a bit more
complete.
Bruce Goldsmith is a British paraglider pilot and designer, and the 2007
Paragliding World Champion. He won the title at Manilla in Australia,
flying an Airwave
Magic FR3 of his own design.[1] He has been British paragliding champion
three times, most recently in 2004.[2] He has also been twice British hang
gliding
champion. Skywings magazine He has been a British Hang Gliding and
Paragliding team member for over 20 years winning numerous FAI team medals
as
well as individual victories. Here is a summary of his main achievements:
1st Italian Championships in Poggio Bustone 2003
World record holder, 274 km declared Goal, Texas, USA, 2003
1st British Paragliding Open 2001
1st Brazilian Championships Andradas, Brazil 2000
1st Brazilian Open 2000
World Cup Paragliding Champion (Serial Class) 1999
1st British Paragliding Open 1998 and 1997
1st Paragliding World Cup, Spain 1995
1st High Level Paragliding Open, Rio, Brazil 1994
1st Criterium de la Reunion 1992
British Hang Gliding Champion 1991 and 1992
1st Bassano Open, Hang Gliding 1991
Hang Gliding Superleague Champion 1990
2nd European Hang Gliding Championships 1988
In 1998 he was awarded the Salemon Trophy by HRH Prince Andrew, at the
Royal Aero Club, for outstanding British design achievement.
Goldsmith is by profession a designer, who started designing hang gliders
in 1979 and paragliders in 1989 [3] and was the designer of paragliders
for Airwave.
He set up the paragliding division of Airwave - which was already a
manufacturer of hang gliders - in 1989. He left to found Ozone paragliders
in 1998,
and returned to Airwave in 2000.[4] He has now moved to the Swiss
paraglider manufacturer Advance. (source: paraglidingforum.com)
Goldsmith is also a journalist and has his own long standing column in
Cross Country Magazine (www.xcmag.com) called Icaristics.
The articles are normally of a technical or instructional nature and these
articles are often translated and reprinted. Goldsmith has also
produced two films, Instability and Instabiliy 2, both instructional
paragliding videos.
He lives in the south of France with his wife and three children. —
Preceding unsigned comment added by Brucegol (talk • contribs) 10:42, 12
April 2011 (UTC)
List of articles mentioning "paraglider" in a significant noteworthy manner:
Paraglider wing-part fundamentals
We are interested in kites with the anchor set into fall so the total kite: wing, tether, and its resistive elements are set into kiting flight in the gliding mode. We are interested in radio-control soaring of such gliding kites. This is basically a paraglider without or with a human person in the anchor/payload subassembly. Do you have product to serve such gliding kites or scale paragliders. October 31, 2011. Review of Kites, Inc. |
Kites have a wing and a kite line (line), or sometimes more than one line. Kite systems may have more than one kite and more than one kite line.
Successful kiting in particular kite applications depends in large part on the kite line's specifications and handling. The integrity of kite lines is affected by wear, reeling, contact with chemicals, loss of strength from knottings, ultraviolet rays of the sun, repeated cycles of use, and damaging actions during use. There are historically classic specifications of kite lines. Kite lines for small toy kites differ greatly from kite lines used for kite tugs that pull commercial cargo ships across the ocean. Sport kites using kite lines two or three or four lines at a time have a need for very low stretch. Single-line recreation kite lines may do well with stretchy kite lines. Kite fighting kites' main tether lines have sharp glass particles bonded to the line. Kite lines misused or abused can cause injury to persons and property. Kite lines vary in pricing and availability. Repair of a particular line has its own arts. Reeling, handling, and storage methods differ for lines depending on the kite applications. Kite lines terminate at the kite's wing/bridle at one end and at some kite mooring at the other end; the mooring is to some object anchor that provides the tug or tension against the resultant of the lift and drag forces of the kite; the anchor is always powered by something even if that something is the Earth's moving surface relative to the air for air kites; a running human kite operator is the source of human powering.
Depending on the kite application and kite system needs, selecting a kite line will consider one or more of the following parameters: availability, base material, color, density, mass per length, size, manufacturer's reports, serial number or product number, diameter, cross-section shape, tensile strength new, aged tensile strength, resistance damage from chemicals, defects, safety factor, resistance to damage from solar radiation (UV stabilization), electrical conductivity, optical conductivity, heat conductivity, moisture intake from water (via humidity, rain, contact with liquid water), buoyancy in water, abrasion resistance, nature of manufacturer's line joins, feel, degradation from knotting, terminal methods, elasticity, structure, signal transmission capacity, visibility to radar, performance over time, maintenance actions, effect on performance from hours of use, drag, negative lift, auxiliary line uses, performance when being reeled under tension, performance when tensed line touches itself, action upon breaking, memory, veil, sleeving, inspectability, surface finish, reaction to heat and cold, taper (as wanted), flexibility, reeling behavior, breaking strength, critical diameter, reliability, test-results portfolio, visibility, twist, plasticity, safety, price. Toy kites sold with a manufacturer's selected line makes the decision easy; the decision is more challenging for custom kite applications. The design and handling of the piano-wire kite line for the high-altitude meteorological observations (1749–1933) was a keen engineering process.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
To avoid burns and cuts, kite lines for children toy kites are frequently soft fuzzy cotton twine.
Lack of stretch or stable line length for control authority is an advantage of special control lines. Melting point is considered when controlling a kite for kite fighting; lower cost cotton line can melt a crossed expensive synthetic line. Kite lines Dyeing kite lines for show and control line management can occur at a line factory or by a user.[9]
Historically, high altitude kite flights were made by atmospheric scientists and meteorologists in the late 19th to early 20th centuries. Routine flights around the world were made using steel wire with single kites and kite trains. The highest recorded flight was made by a German meteorological station at Lindenberg in 1919. It is reported that the top kite reached 31,955 ft above the launch point. The line was over 20 km of high tensile steel piano wire with a breaking strength varying between 134 and 225 kg.[10] In 2000 the single-line single-kite altitude world record for kiting was made using a kite line of woven Kevlar line 3/32 inch in diameter at 270 pound breaking-strength. The kite was described by Richard Synergy in his account of the flight, as employing an angle of attack device to limit line tension to 100 lbs. This gives a safety factor of almost 3 to 1 if the breaking strength of this line is 270 lb.[11] More recent high altitude kite flights by Robert Moore and his team in Australia[12] have been made using Dyneema, a braided Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) line, and the identically structured line, Spectra. Both these lines are stronger and lighter than Kevlar for a given diameter. One of the most important characteristics of line for high altitude kite flying is small diameter and high strength to weight ratio. The greatest barrier to high altitude kite flights is aerodynamic line drag.[13] The use of Dyneema over an extended period has shown that it is highly resistant to ultra violet degradation in comparison to Kevlar.[14]. Richard Crawford, a high altitude flyer from the USA, made an attempt on the world single kite altitude record using a 220 lb test, Technora line manufactured by Twinline. He reported that he flew a delta kite to approximately 6,500 ft in September 2008.[15][16]
When a kite application does not fit a common purpose, then specialized kite lines are used. Setting specific records under controlled conditions allows kite operators or competitors to choose kite lines with high specificity and without excessive safety factors.
The short kite line called the hang loop for the free-flying kite hang gliders has received special engineering attention; the further main kite-lines from the hang loop to the pilot's harness are also highly specialized in design [17].
When maximizing performance for large kites; E. D. Archibald was the first to use piano wire for kiting.[18]
Flatland kiting hang gliders with 3000' of tow line holding the manned hang glider kite takes special care to specify. Protecting the kite line from ground abrasion is considered.[19]
Want to fly an indoor kite without wind? The indoor no-wind kite operator need not worry about line breaks causing damages to downwind property. The choice of line can be very specialized here.
When the kite line is to be invisible, a clear translucent fine thread is chosen.
Making kite lines visible for night flying occurs in short-line and long line applications. Line lights is one solution sometimes used. Lines that carry light is another. Lights on the ground shining on stunt kites and their lines occurs. Flying Kites at Night
Biologists began using the term "ballooning" for spiderling mechanical kiting [20][21]. Another spider silk for the bridge thread is frequently kited. And another thread of the spider is used as a drag line from which spiders frequently swing in the breeze, getting deflected before landing. Humans have used spider silk for making kites[22].
Fit the kite line to the kite application; handle the line as needed to avoid hazards, accidents, and injury to persons and property. The operator of a kite system is fully responsible for damages done by the operation of his or her kite system; this includes the kite line. Pre-flight plan and pre-flight the kite line; avoid surprises. Piano wire is appropriate for certain applications, but totally inappropriate for recreational or sport kite flying. Fishing monofilament line is not used for most hobby, recreational, or sport power kiting because of its stretch, breaking behavior, and thinness; avoid it unless there is a very special application involved. Metal wire can conduct static and current electricity; avoid metal wires unless a professional scientific or industrial engineer approves the line for a specific purpose. Gloves, proper reel choices, goggles, guards, tension limiters, and other safety devices help to reduce accidents. Ability to de-power a kite's lift and drag is a part of sound kite systems. Tensed line can act as razors. Moving lines can cut through flesh too easily. Fatalities too often occur from kite line abuse. Keep kite lines in good condition. Realize that knots weaken kite line. Keep kite lines dry and clean. Log any wear and use of the line; replace lines as needed. Choose a safety factor when designing a line for an application. Avoid flying in the rain or stormy weather changes.[23],[24],[25],[26][27]
Use of the world paraglider, paragliders, paragliding beyond the flight machine or use of the flight machine | |
|
Free as a bird.
Frei wie en vogel.
Libres comme l'air.
Full
report on all incidents are requested to WorldParaGli
Pause to focus on free-flight #t=1 PG of very long tether (VLTPG) line ascending and descending:
Call for essays posted in this thread topic on that matter (or links to your essays). How to, challenges, purposes, ...? Line climbers, rate of climbs, pilot-powered climbing, stored-pilot-power powered climbing, descending on the line, rate of descending, offers from mountain climbing, etc. Why go up or down the very long line during free flight? Accelerated climb loads the wing set w; free-fall lowers the load on the wing set w. Consider special scenarios where climbing or descending on the line would effect some mission or task. How might ascending the line or descending on the line affect launching tactics or landing tactics or flying tactics? Could there be tethers that shrink or expand by way of electric or light or oscillation triggers? What have we on this? Take your time. Have fun. Click image to enlarge it:VLTPG sketch in support of exploring ascending and descending the long tether in the free-flight gliding kite (paraglider). What paragliding tasks might be effected?
Discussing the very long tether paraglider (VLTPG) where we recall that the wing set w cardinality may be one or many, where the resistive set r may have cardinality of one or many, but where from lowest wing bridle point to first element of r is exactly one tether (perhaps shrouded compound).
This immediate note pauses to look at the very long tether (VLT) in the VLTPG as a source of information about the air and wind strata cut through by the long tether.
IDEA: The pilot (human or robot) of the VLTPG could receive data for all the stations of the tether.
The data stream would tell the temperature and airspeed at each station of the long
tether. Such information might expertly be part of a decision-making process about
what to do with ascending or descending the mass of the resistive set or/and what to
do with control of the glide of the wing set w. The VLT would have sensors all along
its length; the sensors would note the temperature and airspeed at each station. Such data combined
with other information might be fed to robot controls or/and made visible to the human
PG pilot. In our relatively short sport tethers there is not enough tallness to play
such data. But with a VLT of, say, 3000 m, there is opportunity to "see" the wind strata
differences by such tether sensing. Near such matter are studies done by Stephen E. Hobbs in his
Ph.D. thesis of 1986.
https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/918/2/sehphd2a.pdfhttp://cires.colorado.edu/science/field/kites/
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979WiEng...3..107B
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010RScI...81g6104W
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989TellB..41..196DThis immediate note pauses to look at the very long tether (VLT) in the VLTPG as a source of information about the air and wind strata cut through by the long tether.DDuring free-flight of the VLTPG, the VLT will have its station parts at specific altitudes. At each station there will be a local air temperature and a local airspeed. Those three data points for each station of the VLT may play to affect flight-control decisions. Control may involve morphing the attitudes and shapes of wing set w elements; control may also involve modifying the shape or texture of segments of the VLT; control may also involve having the mass of the resistive set r climb the VLT or descend lower as the VLT is made longer by unreeling. Control actions would have aims to effect mission aims (which may vary widely from simple sustained soaring, reaching particular altitudes, reaching particular positions in space to perform special tasks, etc. )
An aim to learn and train control systems (pilot included) from such VLT data may become the focus of engineers. The reward of smartly using VLT station data could possibly be great. Effecting transcontinental unpowered free-flight with VLTPG has been a decade load of Dale C. Kramer, soaring champion; a club of known researchers resonate with that same long-flight achievement interest. Another reward space could be recreational and sport soaring where the VLT station data helps the pilot choose direction, speed, coupled loadings (effects of accelerated line climbs and descends, effects of vibratory actions, effects of aerodynamic changes of the long tether or r elements or w elements).Invited: Line-sensor design notes. Estimates of how much learning could occur from VLT flight data. Studies over the effectiveness of controls over w, controls over the VLT, controls over the elements of r, and coordination of controls over the three sets. Reports on progress in scale model experiments with VLTPG unmanned and eventually manned. Choices of line climbers, line descenders, winging the r, winging the w, design for the VLT.
There are uses of the word "paraglider" that are beyond the flight realm, unless one finds the poetry.
There is a rationalist (he thinks that of himself" that calls himself "Paraglider". He is from Kyle, Scotland. http://paraglider.hubpages.com/
Interested in the paragliding topic?
WorldParaGlidingAssociation
Compare airframed single-tether paraglider hang gliders with soft-canopy
unframed paraglider hang gliders.
http://www.chicoer.com/news/ci_19424147
It is a pleasure to have many links to XCmag in LIFT as we grow a review of hang gliders that feature tethers to pilot (paraglider hang gliders; one tether like in many airframed systems featuring the triangle control frame or many tethers like in many soft-canopy systems) as opposed to hang gliders that have no kite tether to the pilot like Otto Lilienthal's. ~~JpF, Nov. 28, 2011. http://www.xcmag.com/2011/11/nicolas-bernhard-is-french-paragliding-champion-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-53677
Nov. 29, 2011 WikiHow
[ ]NFD
yet
How to Discern What Is a Paraglider and What Is Not a
Paraglider
Historically people have stepped through visual and sound cues to discern type of aircraft, especially during war. Others make a hobby of stepping through identification cues in discerning the species of birds. Well, there is confusion in aviation about just what a paraglider is or is not. Here we take steps to form a decision about what kind of hang glider we might see. Is what we see a paraglider or not? Incomplete and even false definitions about what is and is not a paraglider arrive from cult and commercial influences. Such is inadequate for a creative student of aviation, an inventor, a seeker of options in free-flight, an engineer, an author, a teacher, etc. What is wanted is a path to clarity about just what is and is not a paraglider apart from narrow interests. Of course, for the narrow interests, they know what they know. Let's go for more and for clarity.
Does the aircraft have one or more tethers? At least one tether is needed.
Does the aircraft have one or more wings? At least one wing is needed. It is narrow perspective and false to force soft canopy for the set of wings; certainly there are soft-canopy paragliders, but there are also stiff-framed paraglider; and fully solid wings may be the wing or wings of a paraglider.
Does the aircraft have a freely falling mass at the lower end of the tether or tethers? Some mass is needed to be pulled by gravity at the end of the tether or tethers that go up to the wing or wings.
In flight, does the tether generally stay in tension because of the deflective actions of the coupled wing or wings with the mass at the lower end of the tether or tethers?
If there are other objects in the aircraft that have the potential to propel the aircraft up or forward, then are those in "off" status? A paraglider is unpowered; if powered, then it becomes a powered paraglider.
When the aircraft is set into free-fall, does the aircraft glide even a small positive amount?
With the above steps cleared, one probably has a paraglider in focus. You will notice that some "hang gliders" that are not regularly called paragliders are actually mechanically paragliders. You have done the steps of HOW TO discern an aircraft type. Congratulations!
edits by:Joe Faust, TechFlash1, BR, Teresa (see all)
This article has been tagged as a stub. That means it's off to a good start, but still has plenty of room to grow before it reaches its full potential. Can you help it flourish? If you think the article offers complete and accurate instructions, feel free to remove this tag! |
This article may benefit from a new introduction. You can help wikiHow by improving the current introduction, or writing a new one to match the format described in the Writer's Guide. Please remove this notice once this page has been improved. Notice added on: 2011-11-29. |
Man or woman in a gliding kite! Not touching earth! How to control the gliding kite (paraglider) of "single tether" when the wing is an airframed sort of paraglider hang glider? Hang the pilot on short tether in a position where he or she may grab the triangle control frame of the wing and slightly or largely move one's body left or right or forward or backwards in order to change the resultant center of gravity of the system relative to the center of lift of the system. The most common airframe structure for achieving this control is the triangle control frame which is essentially aviation's queen posts joined by a basebar; the similar structure is seen in aviation as a base for landing gear holdin skis and wheels and skids.
Use the double-queen-post frame part along with a connect bar that connects the two extremities of the two queen posts; the arrangement most used is when the two queen posts are footed in the airframe near each other and angled out to allow a substantial connecting bar. The final arrangement forms a triangle and is frequently called "triangle control frame" or "A-frame" or "control frame." The basetube should be joined as though it were a tensional member (sometimes an internal tension cable is placed in the tube that joins the two ends of the queen posts.
Stay the posts to the airframe of the paraglider hang glider with struts or cables following common bracing methods. The pilot will hang by one single kite line from the wing. When gliding the free-flight kite (paraglider) grab lightly the basetube set in space by the queenposts and the staying cables. It is assumed that you have placed the queenposts and the connecting basebar and the hang point of the single tether (the kite line), so that aerodynamic balance is correct for safe flying of the framed paraglider.
|
Notice the one tether (thus paraglider hang glider) and notice the two queenposts and basebar connecting lower ends: TCF triangle control frame. |
OZ Report, Nov. 30, 2011:
Inland air in boundary zone for soft-canopy
PGs:
1. Visualization of real time helicities: What is the state of the art on this?
2. Impact on soft-canopy wings? What scientific studies have been done? What
could be done?
3. How well might the risks be known for flying a soft-canopy PG in inland air
in the boundary zone?
4. Would stack-wing PGs bring an aggregate stability that would help mitigate
risks in flying inland airs in the boundary zone?
5. Launch-time visualization of real time helicities is a matter that might be
separated from above-boundary-zone-flight concerns and challenges.
6. Landing-time visualization of real time helicities is a matter that might be
separated the launch and flight sectors of concerns.
Consider:
1. Routine high altitude separation from soft-canopy wing for a final in
high-sail-loaded parachute. Perhaps radio-control the man-less loose canopy to
capture land zone.
2. Morphing high-performance soft-canopy wing to a high-sail-loaded low L/D
parachute canopy for final.
3. The causes of each and every known PG fatality and serious-injury incident.
Avoid each cause. An incomplete start for study is at
CometClones
4. Launch methods that begin pilot lifting after wing is flying above the
boundary zone. One direction for this is being studied in ParaGlidingForum at
http://www.paraglidingforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=42918 (click some positive
karma?)