[ ] Does GH fairly contextualize the complete works of Francis M. Rogallo from 1945 through 1988?   EnterData +

[ ] Does RogCon know profoundly about the uninventible set of solutions available to those skilled in aircraft design and construction?   EnterData +

[ ] Does RogCon fully appreciate all the versions of Barry Palmer's hang gliders?  EnterData +

[ ] How does RogCon define "modern" in relationship to the Rogallo wing applications in the world?   EnterData +

[ ] Does RogCon appreciate that in 1961 in April in Australia there was an aviation office worker steep in N.A.S.A. Rogallo-related information to be used to make a SkiPlane?     EnterData

[ ] Does RogCon yet see the distinction between ornamental design and process invention matters?         EnterData +

[ ] What does RogCon think about the relationship of the Rogallo wing, Dr. Rogallo, and the Paresev 1B hang glider that was also towed as a kite? Does RogCon appreciate the depth of consultation that was fact and that was respected within N.A.S.A. for Rogallo leading on the matters that resulted in a WING that formed the template for modern Rogallo hang glider wings both in ornament and in process?         EnterData +

[ ] Of all of Rogallo's patents, how many has RogCon yet studied? Has RogCon appreciated each claim in all of the patents?           EnterData +

[ ] Does RogCon yet realize that the Palmer Rogallo version-aluminum had a triangle control bar as well as its forward stiffened stays?  What is RogCon's opinion of the Rogallo winged Mark I of JD's making compared to the Rogallo winged Barry Palmer first hang glider (designed in 1961 and flown in 1962) (ref.?)             EnterData +

[ ] The Australian working with Bill McLachlan testified in public media  that he was aware of several fatalities in the USA regarding Rogallo wing. What does RogCon think about that Rogallo context?  We do not yet have any record of such fatalities for that time period; was the information off? Can we get to the facts?  In the midst of Australia 1961 was an aviation worker who know about "several years" worth of publicity about the Rogallo wing things. What does RogCon think about such Rogallo wing media presences?      EnterData +

[ ] Why does it seem that RogCon very much wants the Paresev 1B not to have flown as a hang glider when--in fact--it did?  Years later, his favorite man JD came up with a firm use of a constructed wing that formally mechanically was hardly indistinguishable from the Paresev 1B  appearance and function.        EnterData +

[ ] Does RogCon properly track the momentum of the Palmer-Miller-MacCready-Faust-SSA-S-SA-Haggard-Eipper-PS-NG as regards the 1970s boon of Rogallo hang gliders?   Markets were affected by the shown strand of synergy; the amount of modern hang gliding affected by that one strand or river of influence is large. There are at least ten important strands of influence that formed the boon of the 1970s. The one of the ten strands is the Bill to Bill and Bill strand--that had a kind of start in Bill McLachlan and came through the other end of the river with Bill Moyes and Bill Bennett; but the Three Bills  strand was just one of ten or so rivers of boon influence. Why does it seem that RogCon only can see a small part of the Three Bills  strand, and even has some severe off-actual meta-claims while trying to handle that strand?  EnterData +

[ ]          EnterData +