Fighter
plane dynamics are closely applicable to predicting fast massive
kiteplane flight, alone or in swarms, with key concepts like
"overshoot", to apply to a kite window as well as a dogfight. We knew
most of this, but not from standardized validated art, and there are
some deep ideas fresh to AWE.
Sample section from WP-
Energy is
a primary factor in controlling and maneuvering an aircraft. If an
attacker has too much energy, it may be easy to get in range but
difficult to prevent an overshoot. Too little energy and the attacker
may not be able to get in range at all. If the defender has more energy
than the attacker, an escape may be possible, but too little energy and
the defender will lose maneuverability. In aviation, the term "energy"
does not refer to the fuel nor the thrust it produces. Instead, thrust
is referred to as "power". Energy is the state of the fighter's mass at any given time, and is the result of the power. Energy comes in two forms, which are kinetic and potential. Kinetic energy is a function of the fighter's mass and speed, while potential energy is
a function of its mass, gravity and altitude. The combined potential
and kinetic energy is called the total energy, or "energy package".
Because the energy package is the combination of mass, speed and
altitude, a fighter flying at low altitude but a high speed may have
the same total energy as a fighter of equal mass, but flying at a low
speed and high altitude. Generally, the fighter that is able to
maintain a higher energy package will have the advantage. However, a
high energy package alone does not improve maneuverability, because
optimal turn performance typically occurs within a range near a certain
speed, called the "corner speed". Also, increasing the mass of the
aircraft would increase its energy package, but angular momentum would
hamper maneuverability, causing the heavier aircraft to turn wider
circles. Instead, the fighter's useful energy is calculated by dividing
its energy package by its weight, determining its specific energy (total
energy per unit weight). A fighter with less mass will generally be
more maneuverable than a fighter with more mass, even if energy
packages are equal, because the lighter aircraft has more specific
energy. "Specific power", on the other hand, is the thrust divided by
weight, and the fighter's ability to generate excess specific power
aids the craft in maintaining its specific energy longer when forced to
turn at an energy-depleting rate. Typically, the fighter with higher
energy (energy fighter) will make an "energy move" like an
"out-of-plane maneuver", to maintain the energy advantage, while the
fighter at an energy disadvantage (angles fighter) will make an "angles
move" such as a break turn, trying to use the opponent's energy to
their own advantage.[11]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_fighter_maneuvers
|
Aug. 25, 2019 Dave Santos
Continuing to cherry-pick from WP Fighter-Plane physics-
"A faster, heavier aircraft may not be able to evade a more
maneuverable aircraft in a turning battle, but can often choose to
break off the fight and escape by diving or using its thrust to provide
a speed advantage. A lighter, more maneuverable aircraft can not
usually choose to escape, but must use its smaller turning radius at
higher speeds to evade the attacker's guns, and to try to circle around
behind the attacker."
This is third-party validation of what has long been proposed here
about AWES flight dynamics across the spectrum between soft power-kites
and hot rigid kiteplanes. No one seems to have noticed in kiteplane
literature that inferior turning rate is the main trade-off to
designing for highest sweep ratio. Quick turning may not be part of the
harvesting mode, but would be critical in shortline overshoot
conditions anywhere at the edge of the kite window.
The ship-kite players calculated that power-to-weight alone advantaged
them, not realizing, for example, that a KiteShip OL or SkySails
parafoil have a higher turn rate at equivalent power. It was kite
sports that alerted us to turn rate dominance in various operational
modes. Then we indentified our high turn-rate low turn-angle "dancing
hippo" dutch-roll sweep modes that promise high airspace efficiency.
This is not the end of moderately scaled hot kiteplanes in AWE. They
can winch-tow or aerotow launch and runway-land and operate long-lined;
if not catapult up, sweep shortlined, and bang-land on a "perch". The
M600's E-VTOL was a marginal "solution" to the topic here, imposing its
own risks. The most likely cause of the recent crash was likely hover
insufficiency, although control failure is also a major risk (many
failure modes covered in past years).
|