Topic:
Rigid Wings versus Soft Wings for Generating Utility-Scale Kitricity?
|
Send AWE notes and topic replies to editor@upperwindpower.com |
Power-Kite v. Energy-Drone TPL/MSE To AWEurope IEA Wind work-package participants: Any disagreement with general engineering-science predicted here? The idea is to inform decision-makers about what theory and growing test data indicates. TPL is Jochem's favorite metric, TPL, related to TRL. Power-to-Mass is closely equivalent to TPL. "Energy Drone" term-of-art distinguishes current high-complexity flight platforms from COTS TRL9 Power Kites. ============ Many AWES developers are sadly mistaken about "solutions to mitigate (high MSE) for energy-drones," by mistaking the fundamental physics. Most AWEurope players are still betting on Energy Drone Design (combinations of rigid airframes, eVTOL, catapults, control pods, complex active control, flygens, etc.), with high MSE and low TPL. Therefore, it is necessary to continue testing Energy Drones, and let predicted poor scalability, power curves, and crash statistics speak for themselves. Ampyx AP3 is the next major test case (2021). Meanwhile, Power Kite AWES will also continue in testing. Controversy over which AWE paradigm is superior is being decisively resolved. Already, there is a considerable case-base, from Makani to SkySails, with crash statistics, power curves, and economic data. There will be no lack of theoretical support for the flight data. |
??post?? |