Topic
Kite Vortex Lift Aerodynamic Parameter Identification
Send AWE notes and topic replies to editor@upperwindpower.com
October 31, 2019       Dave Santos

Thank you, Joe. Thanks also to R.Borobia-Moreno, D.Ramiro-Rebollo, G.Sanchez-Arriaga and R.Schmehl for the analytic and experimental work that rigorously revealed the anomalous aerodynamic parameter, that any of several scholars or aerodynamicists in kite circles could also have identified as Vortex Lift, given the same prompting. Kite science is advancing as old loose ends and open questions resolve by the accumulated terrific efforts of so many.

As case notes, Brasington's best-of-kite-store Ninja turbine crab-claw design (used for KiteSat7) is clearly vortex lift enhanced, and large birds commonly land with each wing bent in a delta-form, developing high vortex-lift for optimal final deceleration. The top advantage of vortex lift in AWE is best low wind performance, to keep flying as other wings struggle and fall
October 30, 2019              Dave Santos

Kite Vortex Lift Aerodynamic Parameter Identification

It was a popular scientific paradox generations ago, that bumblebee flight was "impossible" under standard aerodynamic theory. It slowly came to light how many insects develop extra lift by powerful Vortex Lift on their wings, and so do bats, hummingbirds, and many other birds. A useful new flight regime based on vortex lift of strakes and delta wings at high angles of attack slowly was slowly perfected in both fighter jets and delta kites. The Concord and Space Shuttle landed by enhanced vortex lift. The NASA Power Wing (NPW) is a soft single-skin (SS) delta kite with vortex lift enhancement. 

Kites have long been known to operate effectively at high AoA, and associated vortex lift is readily attributable to the common swept surfaces and turbulating features of classic kite designs.

The kite vortex lift aerodynamic parameter is often misleadingly identified as "stall", because classic stall of a long wing causes an abrupt loss of lift and control, but vortex lift of a stubby swept wing actually increases well beyond normal critical angles, and stability is typically enhanced. Bumblebee aside, the funny thing is that vortex lift is also identifiable as as frontal drag; but in the inclined airframe reference frame, aligned in the normal lift direction, its lift.
==========================

Extending the analysis of kite vortex lift solves an interesting observed power kite flight anomaly. If one tries to hold a high-AR high-L/D hot power kite static, stalled low in the window, its very hard to control and the kite tends to fall down. At the same time, many a low-AR low-L/D traditional kite will just hang there happily. Obviously the traditional kite is using vortex lift that the hot kite cannot. This is bad news for hot kiteplanes in weak fluky wind.

We can now effectively identify the NPW as a soft delta kite, by its projected plan-form, that therefore develops strong vortex lift. This explains the anomalous excellent performance of the NPW compared to more complex more expensive power kites. It was a revelation at NABX2007 that the poor kite buggy pros with NPWs were competitive with expensive hot power kites. Each kite had its superior characteristic modes (see old discussions) and the general outcome was rough parity across all conditions. NASA developed the NPW 50yrs ago for maximal power-to-weight for space missions, and its still a top wing, by both vortex lift power and SS construction.

Furthermore, and this is new domain art, vortex lift is apparently a key aerodynamic parameter of high turning rate of low-AR stunt and power kites. High-AR race wings dominate in max crosswind velocity, but not max power, and turn quite slowly and loosely compared to the low-AR wings. The common LEI freestyle power kite has considerable planform sweep, and associated vortex lift, for fast turn-rate in tight turns. Vortex lift also explains which kites best maintain high power in tight turns.

================
"The full state vectors of the three kites were reconstructed and a data set with the aerodynamic force and torque, angle of attack and side slip angle for different maneuvers was created. However, difficulties arose for the aerodynamic parameter identification because the kites spent most of the time in a post-stall state during the flight."

AWEC2019- Flight Testing, Aerodynamic Parameter Identification, and Dynamic Simulation of Rigid and Flexible Kites Applied to Airborne Wind Energy Systems 

R.Borobia-Moreno1,2,D.Ramiro-Rebollo1,G.Sanchez-Arriaga1,R.Schmehl3 1UniversidadCarlosIIIdeMadrid,Spain, 2NationalInstituteofAerospaceTechnology,Spain 3DelftUniversityofTechnology,TheNetherlands
================







================

It was a popular scientific paradox generations ago, that bumblebee flight was "impossible" under standard aerodynamic theory. It slowly came to light how many insects develop extra lift by powerful Vortex Lift on their wings, and so do bats, hummingbirds, and many other birds. A useful new flight regime based on vortex lift of strakes and delta wings at high angles of attack slowly was slowly perfected in both fighter jets and delta kites. The Concord and Space Shuttle landed by enhanced vortex lift. The NASA Power Wing (NPW) is a soft single-skin (SS) delta kite with vortex lift enhancement. 

Kites have long been known to operate effectively at high AoA, and associated vortex lift is readily attributable to the common swept surfaces and turbulating features of classic kite designs.

The kite vortex lift aerodynamic parameter is often misleadingly identified as "stall", because classic stall of a long wing causes an abrupt loss of lift and control, but vortex lift of a stubby swept wing actually increases well beyond normal critical angles, and stability is typically enhanced. Bumblebee aside, the funny thing is that vortex lift is also identifiable as as frontal drag; but in the inclined airframe reference frame, aligned in the normal lift direction, its lift.

================
"The full state vectors of the three kites were reconstructed and a data set with the aerodynamic force and torque, angle of attack and side slip angle for different maneuvers was created. However, difficulties arose for the aerodynamic parameter identification because the kites spent most of the time in a post-stall state during the flight."

AWEC2019- Flight Testing, Aerodynamic Parameter Identification, and Dynamic Simulation of Rigid and Flexible Kites Applied to Airborne Wind Energy Systems 

R.Borobia-Moreno1,2,D.Ramiro-Rebollo1,G.Sanchez-Arriaga1,R.Schmehl3 1UniversidadCarlosIIIdeMadrid,Spain, 2NationalInstituteofAerospaceTechnology,Spain 3DelftUniversityofTechnology,TheNetherlands
================







================


Send AWE notes and topic replies to editor@upperwindpower.com