Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                                AWES6662to6711 Page 31 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6662 From: Doug Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6663 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Lasers in AWES

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6664 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Join AWES offshore with power-buoy technology?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6665 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6666 From: Doug Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6667 From: dave santos Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6668 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Aerographite breaks record for least-dense "solid"

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6669 From: roderickjosephread Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6670 From: Dan Parker Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6671 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6672 From: harry valentine Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6673 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6674 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Long-Elevated-Ring Transportation and Energy Generation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6675 From: dave santos Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6676 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6677 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6678 From: Doug Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6679 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6680 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6681 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Bali Big-Kite Culture (great intro video)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6682 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6683 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6684 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6685 From: harry valentine Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Difffusers - follow up from Wind energy device instructed by N

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6686 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6687 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6688 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6689 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6690 From: Doug Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: Bali Big-Kite Culture (great intro video)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6691 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6692 From: dave santos Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6693 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/17/2012
Subject: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6694 From: Doug Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: Re: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6695 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6696 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: SkySails Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6697 From: Doug Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: economics of YoYo Power thought experiment

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6698 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6699 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6700 From: harry valentine Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6701 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6702 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Cool New KiteMotors from Util and KiteLab Austin

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6703 From: harry valentine Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6704 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Open AWE's Anthem? "Kite Song" was inspired by Austin Kite Fest: "ma

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6705 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Open AWE's Anthem? "Kite Song" was inspired by Austin Kite Fest:

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6706 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6707 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6708 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6709 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6710 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6711 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6662 From: Doug Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
--- In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, "mmarchitti" <marchitti@...
*****If the idea is good it would seem easy enough to develop at a small acale.*****

Now the yo-yo 3MW version is being developped and built.
*****OK so that will be great to see 3 MW generated by a yo-yo - I can't wait. I will hold my breath. *****
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6663 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Lasers in AWES
Lasers in AWES and kite systems?

  • Cut sails
  • Control systems
  • Send power to elements in system from within the system
  • Display
  • Messaging
  • Send power from wing set to receptors on the ground or in the air. 
  • Send wireless power from ground devices or airborne devices to elements of the AWES
  • Laser tools carried aloft for welding, cutting, fire ignition, triggering events
  • LaserMotive  is a Seattle-based company developing wireless power delivery systems using laser beams to transmit electricity without wires.
  • ?
  • ?
  • ?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6664 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Join AWES offshore with power-buoy technology?
Join AWES offshore with PowerBuoy technology?
Let the PowerBuoy be the anchor place for an AWES. 


While water-wave energy is being mined, the upper-air AWES could be mining the winds. 

... borrowing Selsam: "just sayin' ..."


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6665 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/12/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Doug, most of the developpment costs for a small scale carousel is of the same order of a large one, if not higher. Try to think of a small diameter carousel: in that case the same tangential velocity for the flying kite has to be obtained with a higher angular velocity in comparison with a larger one, therefore you need to control it with a higher frequency.

Also for the yo-yo version we are almost in the same situation. Try also to think for the permissions to fly, the no-fly-zone required: it is difficult and relatively costly to obtain it for a few kW power.

It's better you do not hold your breath waiting for the plant, you could be in danger, because it will take a bit long to built it and to have it functioning. There are a lot of problems that the team has to face, and they are new and challenging: you have to built a very special aircraft and a very special carrier aircraft, with technical problems all over, and with very little money.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6666 From: Doug Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Typical:
1) Insist on development at a huge scale
2) cite limited budget
voila!
Instant excuse for no resulting product!
(Well certainly we're too important to mess with that small stuff and clearly the market is limited and...)

Citing the need for megawatt-size prototypes is one of the most common stagnation points for new wind turbine designs.
In fact from what I've seen, it is the kiss of death.
It makes the failure of one prototype kill the whole company.
Like one called "The Wind Turbine Company" (very imaginative name too...)
In reality you will need probably tens, if not hundreds, of prototypes to get it right.
=:O

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6667 From: dave santos Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Notes-

AlexB's decade-old laddermill variants are of interest mostly by key details, such as staging the ladder at high altitude and decisively positing a pilot-liter element. His many other AWES concepts contain far more visionary aspects, so don't dismiss him as a laddermill slave. DaveC taught us to look at novel aspects of patents, rather than quickly dismiss them as "me-too" "copycats". AlexB also represents a very seasoned opinion of AWES feasibility, deserving special attention.

Regarding KiteGen carousel concepts, Doug needs to be reminded that 1) Not all concepts are adequately modeled at small scale (ie. Moonshots), 2) Not every worthy inventor is qualified to create prototypes. Absence of a prototype is often unrelated to feasibility. Its unfair and illogical to condemn concepts in such cases for a lack of a scale prototype. 

A simple AWE carousel can be shown by flying two power kites from a playground carousel, but this is not KiteGen's R&D style, which gambles on large well-funded experiments as the quickest route to utility-scale commercial success. KiteLab Group's culture can in fact make a convincing small scale carousel experiment with minor funding, but the KiteGen carousel concept is seen as having economic scaling issues compared to competing variants that seem to far better maximize land, airspace, and capital. In particular, well-spaced pumping trains on a farm can drive a central generator by phased tugs with far less capital infrastructure and flight control challenges. Local failures do not stop the show. The early carousel ideas are the stepping-stone to the new gigawatt architectures.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6668 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Aerographite breaks record for least-dense "solid"
Energy kite systems may well have uses for Aerographite, the new king of least-dense solids or "lightest solids"
Time will tell, but this is sure interesting. 
Seems at first blush to be about four times less dense than the recent metallic-lattice now runner up; and both winners over extant aerogels. Characteristics are special for each contestant.  The Aerographite has yet to be used in a kite; we look forward to annoucements. 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6669 From: roderickjosephread Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Although it goes against every tensioned fibre and compressed cell of my being . , I have to agree with Doug on this. eugh excuse me a wee sec. bleugh! better now.
You can make small scale models and run them in a dense fluid at the same speed as your final model.

actually I quite liked his last post too. shhh it's on the hush hush though.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6670 From: Dan Parker Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Roderick,
 
             Even idiots have some good points, especially when they rant endlessly to no end, every once in a very long while they may say something spot on. The endless ranting is problematic.
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Dan'l
 
                                                                                                                         
 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: rod.read@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:18:52 +0000
Subject: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

 


Although it goes against every tensioned fibre and compressed cell of my being . , I have to agree with Doug on this. eugh excuse me a wee sec. bleugh! better now.
You can make small scale models and run them in a dense fluid at the same speed as your final model.

actually I quite liked his last post too. shhh it's on the hush hush though.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6671 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
Osborn is 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6672 From: harry valentine Date: 7/13/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Even more amazing is when they actually build something that works .  . .   in defiance of all odds!  You're right, endless ranting can sometimes be bothersome.


Harry


To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
From: spiralairfoil@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:49:33 -0400
Subject: RE: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

 

Roderick,
 
             Even idiots have some good points, especially when they rant endlessly to no end, every once in a very long while they may say something spot on. The endless ranting is problematic.
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Dan'l
 
                                                                                                                         
 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: rod.read@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:18:52 +0000
Subject: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin

 


Although it goes against every tensioned fibre and compressed cell of my being . , I have to agree with Doug on this. eugh excuse me a wee sec. bleugh! better now.
You can make small scale models and run them in a dense fluid at the same speed as your final model.

actually I quite liked his last post too. shhh it's on the hush hush though.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6673 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
KiteGen doesn't arrive out of the blue. The company, where the concept took shape, was developping/producing smart sensors and robot devices for the industry. The idea of exploiting the high altitude wind power was born almost ten years ago, and after thorough study and the assembly of a very simple demonstrator, the concept in 2005 (KiWiGen at that time) was submitted to the European Community.

In 2006 a more representative demonstrator (the mobile gen) was built and was tested for two years (there are several youtube videos where you can see it functioning). It reached 40-50 kW peak power; however it was not the continuous power or energy production the main goal of the mobile gen, whereas the feasibility/testing of the technology, as the cables, the control, the manoeuvres, was the priority.

Therefore, in a certain way, a small scale plant has been already built. May be one could say that it was better to improve/complete the mobile gen, to produce it at industrial level. Well, suggestions on how to proceed have been plentiful, but speaking in retrospect, and out of the working field, is much too easy.

In a certain way it should also be said that the present plant contains the small scale prototype, because at the beginning it will be producing at a much lower power and hours.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6674 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Long-Elevated-Ring Transportation and Energy Generation
Long-Elevated-Ring Transportation and Energy Generation 
... flowering of Pocock's ways and means ...

Have a really giant ring that encircles a city or region or state or nation or sea or lake or ocean or earth (west to east travel loop around the earth). 
Have on that elevated ring  several cars that contain people and goods. 
The cars are pulled from point to point for loading and unloading. 
The cars are pulled along by kites. 
The cars have axle-mounted generators that produce electricity as the transportation occurs. 
Move people and goods while generating electricity from the wind using the set of kites.  
Some of the gained energy will supply for lulls.  
Prefer to have wing-set lifters as LTA kytoons for ever-up tugging kite systems; lifted could be low-mass kite trains.  
Storm? For storm: morph the wing set to yet mine the storm.  
Elevation might be by kytoon-lifted tension legs that are soil anchored. 

... 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6675 From: dave santos Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Hi Mario,

Of course KiteGen is one of the leading efforts in AWE, with many historic firsts and records. KiteGen was fortunate to have the support of a large pool of small investors, which allowed project engineers to attempt a larger developmental scale, with elective choices like large carbon-fiber components, exotic batteries, permanent galvanized steel ground structure, and so on. These engineers may easily misunderstand that by "small-scale" experiments, most of us mean tiny scale models, the "toy-scale".

Toy-scale allows extremely fast and cheap exploration of most fundamental feasibility issues. This is the logic behind Moritz Diehl's strategic decision to work at the meter scale for five years. KiteLab Group embraces the toy-scale as well, having conducted hundreds of AWES experiments across the entire concept space. Testing carousel configurations on a small scale seems very cheap and fast, if anyone wants to try.

That KiteGen is conducting small modest experiments from a "palace" is perhaps more ironic than logical. Lets hope KiteGen quickly solves its detail-engineering challenges (launching and landing dynamics, retrieval stability, etc.) to compete in an ever more crowded field,

daveS

PS SkySails copied a successful old meteorological-kite launch and land method (small mast), and found it suitable. Why does not KiteGen adopt this open-source method? A wildly waving robot stem is hard to imagine as the more suitable solution.





Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6676 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
A really interesting idea. I don't understand a few things.  Why so much divergence in the air inlet. On the face of it it looks like a very low supersonic inlet. There all kinds of turning losses going from the inlet down into the 22 plenum and then we're blowing the exhaust air out the top of wing forward surface which intuition says will be a lift killer. Why not do this with axial flow fan generators and exhaust the air out the back. My gut says it would work better this way. As with all airborne generators I wonder about getting power down the tether but this thing should be flyable in almost any wind speed from say 20 knots on up and with a bit cleverness you could maintain generator speeds using variable inlet or exit geometry or variable pitch blades. I don't how familiar anyone is with Ram Air Turbines (RATS) used in commercial aircraft for emergency power but it would be pretty easy to use them as core of demo system for this. The other nice thing about this is that one should be able to take conventional aircraft control technology and adapt it easily to fly it automatically.

Regards,

Chris 
On Jul 14, 2012, at 12:49 AM, Joe Faust wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6677 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
The air inlet looks like is at the proper diffuser angle to feed a low-speed turbine.  There seems to be no rationale for using a torturous internal flow path where a light, efficient structure usually resides, except to connect the high and low pressure points on a diagram.  A wing and a RAT may look less elegant, but a lot more feasible.

Bob Stuart

On 14-Jul-12, at 11:33 AM, christopher carlin wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6678 From: Doug Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Alexander Bolonkin
even a stopped clock is right twice a day!

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6679 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
I am interested in Moritz and SkySail achievement, if you can give me more technical information I will be glad.

The financial and business aspects have to be discussed and evaluated in relative terms, comparing the technological proposals and goals, and in term of the results reached in front of the resources given. For a private laboratory/small-industry you cannot go to the privates or small savers and say: hey man, I have a good idea, I have that project, give me money, help me with financial support. You will have a bad reply. Instead you must have a good record of technological achievements, a seriosu study behind, a good industrial relationship, a lot of stamina, and something else. Nonetheless it is very very hard to gain trust.

Nonethless, in the energy research field, we have witnessed large governement support to projects that I do not know how to define:

- Only few years ago in Europe there were projects all over supported by national funds to develop the hydrogen technology, and a lot of people believed that hydrogen was the energy future.

- Also a Nobel prize in Physics were awarded by large funds to develop a solar technology that in the States had just proved that was not better than photovoltaic

- I do not know how many billion (miliard in Italian) have been assigned to nuclear fusion, that in the past decades has not given results, and scientist hope to reach something (a demonstrator may be) in 20-30 years from now.

Should I continue the list?

Money of course are necessary, but are not sufficient for making good projects? Well, they are the last, although necessary, incredient.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6680 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/14/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
Dear Bob,

Diffusers are always a bit of mystery to me and I must say I'm used to dealing with inlets for for fans rather than turbines. I would have thought you'd want to maximize total pressure recovery at the entrance to the turbine so why diffuse at all. In any case we're in complete agreement about the tortuous flow path. What's you're opinion of dumping the exhaust air from the top of the leading surface of the wing? It makes no sense to me. You raise an interesting issue do you bury the turbines in the wing as in some earlier aircraft designs or do you pod mount them under the wing as in most current designs? All sorts of interesting trades. Personally I like the buried approach but one would have to run the trades.

If you could get by the environmental issues transmitting the power to the ground via microwave beam would be neat.

Regards,

Chris

    
On Jul 14, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Bob Stuart wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6681 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Bali Big-Kite Culture (great intro video)
Of highly developed traditional kite cultures worldwide, the Maylay Archipelago is a top region, and this is a great intro video. These are very "advanced" kites; note the contrast of the Bebean "dancing" kite type with the more stable Janggan kites with long hypnotic tails. Such "engineered" dancing is a shallow figure-of-eight, Dutch-Roll, a basis for "passive-control" power generation by tapping a two-line tether yoyo style. Note also the two-stick Pecukan kite able to fly stably and efficiently with minimal complication. This wing looks like NASA's latest, for all its elegance, and the local Bali fliers see in it their most salient invention in world kite design, a basic element included in larger more complex kites.

This video is limited to elite competition of very formal types. The Balinese also improvise freely to make any spectacle imagined fly, including complex mechanical effects. Banners on poles are another well-developed genre, with many elaborations, but this video only hints at these other specialties. The key role of  essential roots music (and kite hummers) and magical narratives is evidenced. This kite festival owes little to Western versions, even as world kite cultures begin to interact and overlap.

It has been my honor to study these kites directly in the World Kite Museum collection. The Balinese people could surely make their own kite power mostly by skills and knowledge already in their possession-

Layangan Ungasan Bali - Traditional Kite Festival 2011.mp4 ...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np6ERcRX2g8Aug 15, 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by 77kore
Layangan Ungasan Bali - Traditional Kite Festival 2011.mp4 ...South Padre Island Kite Festival 2011by ...
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6682 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
AFAIR,  the rule of thumb for ductwork is a 10 degree divergence to prevent turbulence.  This can be finessed, of course, or subdivided.  Yes, the exhaust location spoils lift.  As I said, the sole rationale seems to be to connect the high and low pressure points on a wing, ignoring what they are there for.  

Visual elegance is compelling.  A classic Bugatti engine compartment is gorgeous, with simple shapes, simplicity, and esthetic themes but the new crammed-in mess  blows its doors off.  

Re: flying microwave generators.  Have you hoisted a microwave oven?

Bob

On 14-Jul-12, at 6:58 PM, christopher carlin wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6683 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
Chris, Bob,

Using the top of the wing as the turbine diffuser makes sense if you allow that power extraction from a wing involves trading away lift in any case. What bothers me most is the the essential frontal area of the  foil's stagnation zone is just too short to sum up greatly. You need a far deeper/fatter wing section with an exaggerated "big mouth" intake to hope for adequate power at ordinary low speeds. Yes, convoluted internal flow greatly hurts performance as well.

Far better for power extraction potential is fit a large-disk turbine just under the trailing edge of a C-wing above, and also just above a fitted lower wing leading edge, a stagger-wing ring-wing affair. This may be the trade sweet spot in seeking to augment a small bare turbine with lifitng wing/duct features. These wings might be so narrow as to no longer act protectively like ducts operationally. The challenge is then is to get the low snarl-factor of the original Osborn clean-wing concept.

Perhaps best of all is to think big and intend for the ground surface itself to be the lower wall to flow, for ground-effect. A single-skin kite arch a mile across and two thousand feet high can augment the flow of many turbines hung just below the trailing edge. Hill, ridge, or valley suitably positioned could add ram and diffuser boost,

daveS
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6684 From: dave santos Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
        Mario wrote- "I am interested in Moritz and SkySail achievement, if you can give me more technical information I will be glad."

Moritz has expressed his lab's five-year small-is-beautiful prototype R&D strategy on several occasions, but i remember his AWEC2011 pronouncement best. 

Skysails, of course, has a fairly well proven launch-land method. What's not well known is that this simple method dates to a century ago, and that Chinese "ring on a pole" kite methods are depicted in many old images.

Mario, 

We have a lot of agreement on the need for all of us in AWE to work better together, rather than the isolated efforts of so many small teams. In particular, gigawatt AWES concepts like carousels, trains, and arches need a large coordinated feasibility testing program to validate the best methods for major investment. We can  then widely share commercial success, rather than the present slow painful winner-takes-all zero-sum game. KiteGen has had trouble revaluing its equity shares low enough to match peers for merger purposes, but there may be no choice soon. The next phase in our industry may be "Merge or Die", the winner being the biggest coalition of early developers.

On the same team,

 daveS



Walter Diem's Lost Golden Age of "Wetterdrachen" (Weather Kites)

tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AirborneWindEnergy/message/3768
2 posts - 1 author - Jun 22, 2011
Walter Diem's Lost Golden Age of "Wetterdrachen" (Weather Kites... This overlookedhistory is full of prior art and operational excellence.



text copy-

A great in-person contact from Fano2011 was Walter Diem, the leading German kite historian, who was sellling his scholarly books from the back of his car. His latest volume (2010) is titled Wetterdrachen and chronicles almost 300yrs of meteorological research with kites. 

One instantly grasps from this book how little most of us know about how the kite served as a hugely popular and quite widespread scientific platform from just before the birth of powered aviation and persisted in major use up to about 1930. These last four decades constitute a golden age of large kites reaching astounding altitudes with large payloads. Meteorological "drachenstations" were established in countries worldwide expeditions took technical kites to the ends of the earth. 

This overlooked history is full of prior art and operational excellence. For example, we can see in Skysails' mast launch method specific antecedents in ship based kite operations (the kiteship Skagerak of 1906)), which Skysails likely adopted from Walter's documentation or other orginal German source. Similarly we see a deep connection with KiteGen's "cuppola" kitehouse design and the many classic windenhaus designs shown in the book. One photo is an old Flemish "Vliegerstation" surrounded by bikes (no cars), which shows how deep that thriving bike culture is.

Walter's books are gold mines of detailed information, as well as crash courses in the German language. Fortunately for most of us the hundreds of historic photos tell a vivid story. Drachen Foundation was a key resource for this major work. Lets hope Walter's work is translated soon. 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6685 From: harry valentine Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Difffusers - follow up from Wind energy device instructed by N
Diffusers work well with high wind velocities, as encountered on gas and steam turbine engines.

In the aeronautical world, there is a rectangular inlet that allows for variable cross-sectional area . .  .  . the design includes a "dump gate". This technology could help wind power people develop an alternative means by which to deal with high-velocity winds .  .  .  . something that accelerates to 60m/s, up from 15m/s. During such times, it becomes important to lock down conventional wind turbines.

A variable cross-sectional area inlet with a dump gate could restrict the mass of air flow that interacts with the turbine, with wind speeds of 60m/s.

High-altitude wind power involves wind with higher availability and higher velocity. Diffuser technology would be helpful in regions where high-elevation winds are affected by the Jet stream.

Harry


To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: bobstuart@sasktel.net
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:16:49 -0600
Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn

 
AFAIR,  the rule of thumb for ductwork is a 10 degree divergence to prevent turbulence.  This can be finessed, of course, or subdivided.  Yes, the exhaust location spoils lift.  As I said, the sole rationale seems to be to connect the high and low pressure points on a wing, ignoring what they are there for.  

Visual elegance is compelling.  A classic Bugatti engine compartment is gorgeous, with simple shapes, simplicity, and esthetic themes but the new crammed-in mess  blows its doors off.  

Re: flying microwave generators.  Have you hoisted a microwave oven?

Bob

On 14-Jul-12, at 6:58 PM, christopher carlin wrote:



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6686 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
Dear Bob,

I'm not sure the microwave oven analogy is entirely fair although I take your point. There were very serious studies of high energy microwave transmission from satellites years ago as a means to transmit power from vast solar arrays. The idea died mostly because of concerns over differentiating  between power stations and directed energy weapons - not because of weight concerns. I think we'd find the actually weight of a microwave transmitter might not be too bad. Don't know haven't run numbers.

As to divergence angle. Are you concerned over turbulent boundary layer growth and trying to keep it out of the flow actually going into the turbine or turbulence in the core flow? Maybe I need to go back and look at "Schlichting". It's been 15 years since I worried about this sort of thing and 30 since I opened the book. I don't remember fan inlets expanding behind the cowl nearly that much but the situation is probably different. The fan is sucking on the flow while the turbine is impeding it.

Not worrying about the fiddly details I would think that a tethered wing with a series of round inlets and embedded axial turbines would be a pretty neat concept. You probably could get really cute and use some fluid amplifier concepts to steer the exhaust for control and thus eliminate some control surfaces. On the other hand I can see some advantages to the high lift surfaces in the patent for deploying and recovering the wing.

Regards,

Chris    
On Jul 15, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Bob Stuart wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6687 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
I don't think that diffusers are an economically viable component in any wind energy system.  Shrouded fans are useful to get around space restrictions or transonic troubles.  This is not our province.  Visually, a wing and open turbine is still dominated by the wing, especially in motion.  
Since airborne generators seem limited to short tethers, they probably also match small, frequently launched kites.  If damage to exposed bits is a concern, I think that a turbine hub could be made that would let the blades fold on impact.  

Bob

On 15-Jul-12, at 9:21 PM, christopher carlin wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6688 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/15/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
This is getting to be an interesting discussion. Forgetting all issues of ATC and other problems for the moment what intrigued me about this concept is that it looks like an airplane and could be flown like one. If you could keep the tether weight down - a very big if I admit - conceptually you could fly this up to jet stream altitudes - 30,000 feet - and achieve relative velocities of 100 to 150 knots fairly consistently. There is a lot of energy in that sort of breeze as people have said but if you design the power system to operate in that range rather than the say 20 to 40 knot range most low altitude systems are designed for I think you're looking at whole new design space. If I work backwards from my airplane experience I think you're right large diameter unshrouded props are probably the way to go. I think you'd have to make them folding for launch but since they aren't the propulsion system that's ok. I'm not sure there is a big advantage to having them under wing. I would think they'd work better either forward or aft of the wing. What I'm wrestling with now is these big turbines have finite weight so obviously the wing needs to be sized to lift their weight + controls etc. + the tether. Would the drag of the turbine have any effect on the lift generated by the wing. At least in a first order sense it seems to me it doesn't. The next issue then is air density. Yes we have high velocity at altitude but low density. Having talked my way through this I think it looks cool but you couldn't get enough power out of any reasonable size turbine to make it worthwhile.

Most interesting.
Regards,

Chris  
On Jul 16, 2012, at 5:13 AM, Bob Stuart wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6689 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: Wind energy device instructed by Norbert L. Osborn
A trailing turbine on a short shaft is probably optimum. If you look at a flow diagram through a wind turbine, it looks like a wine glass with a fat stem.  A relatively narrow stream of air enters, and a wide one, at lower relative velocity leaves.  It is the opposite of a propeller improving lift when blowing on a wing.  The wing, OTOH, can produce vortices that benefit a pair of turbines.  

If you check the archives, I think you will find that the best minds here have not managed to believe in a conductive tether of anything like jet-stream length.  AWE shows theoretical advantages at almost any kite-like altitude, so it can presumably get higher and more powerful by small increments.  So far, mechanical transmission seems like the best bet for high-altitude work, since it employs the necessary tether without necessarily adding much to its weight.  New materials can change anything, but we can explore the variations with what we have, and enjoy the luxury of changing one thing at a time as they appear.

Bob

On 15-Jul-12, at 11:12 PM, christopher carlin wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6690 From: Doug Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: Bali Big-Kite Culture (great intro video)
Dave S.:
I can now tell your posts by reading just the first word. "Of".
:)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6691 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
I appreciate the Ernst Schumacher work, but I think that the speculation on his economics/philosophy line of thought has really weak connection with our technical challenge: if you have to built a bridge to cross a river, or to built a ship to cross the ocean, you have to cope with certain constraints. I know that Moritz is studying high altitude wind energy since a long time, he is a very talented guy together with his collegue, Boris Houska, and many many others. However a declaration of principle is a thing, the building of a hardware is another.

After all, several company involved in the building of high altitude systems are using/experimenting kites with 15-30 squares meters. And all of them will try to scale them up, as a natural process. They have started with demonstrator systems of 20-40 kW and they will try to get high power: it is a logical process.

SkySail, after all, is not building system for producing energy, but he is using kite to pull a ship, therefore some of their solution cannot be tansferred directly to our field. Infact, on a ship, that in any case has an engine that push the ship, you have always an apparent wind that can raise the kite.

"Ring on a pole", as far as I understand the concept/method, needs a lot of power in moving/rotating the stem, therefore you need very pwerfull actuators and big transmission parts. Actually, on a certain amount, it is already used to raise the kite. Me too have proposed two methods, one authomatic and another manual. A friend of mine also has proposed an alternative method. I think that more than ten methods have been studied, and some experimented. But I think you know what this mean in term of time, effort, and costs...

Be sure that personnel in the team are working together with other industries, with university students, and with all the people who have good will.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6692 From: dave santos Date: 7/16/2012
Subject: Re: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Mario,

The phrase "small is beautiful" is broader in usage than Schumacher's famous book, and i did not mean to associate Moritz's decision to work small with Schumaker or Approriate-Technology. Moritz is clearly after optimal High-Technology, even if he chooses serious study with small experiments. Sorry for the confusion.

In this case "small is beautiful" expresses the many advantages of aerospace prototyping at the smallest practical scale, especially to explore new concepts. In this style of engineering, KiteGen would have made a long series (dozens or hundreds) of very small working developmental prototypes to prevalidate every aspect of operation, before risking a full-scale system. Time will tell if KiteGen scaled prematurely, while other teams instead chose to stay small until every aspect of operations was well validated.

The SkySails mast launching method does not need a boat, but is being applied to their fixed energy farm concept, as we have known for about a year. A "ring on a pole" does not need active power, but can be fully passive with perhaps only a swivel mount required for basic functionality.

It will be exciting if KiteGen can show superior launch-land methods to the well-known classic options available, but time is passing fast,

daveS

PS I am very curious about KiteGen's equity structure, and how it is recalibrating (or not) to fit circumstances. My understanding is that it started with a very high book value (based on the price demanded of WOW for its shares) controlled mostly by the main founder. How can KiteGen sustain that set-up with so many new competitors worldwide vying for investor attention? 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6693 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/17/2012
Subject: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

Technical update from the Makani team, as well as a link to an explanation of how the wing stays aloft, an International Energy Agency report and the results of our servo showdown.
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.



Makani Power is developing a utility scale airborne wind turbine. While we continue to demonstrate the functionality of the technology with Wing 7, we are working to develop the tools needed for commerical operation and deployment. 


A barrier to conventional wind turbine deployment both on and offshore is radar obstruction, particularly in coastal areas with military installations. The lower frontal area of the Makani system, combined with the thin wing skin is expected to offer a reduced radar cross section compared to conventional turbines. Makani has been fortunate to win an SBIR grant from the Army to analyze the radar cross section of the Makani system, and if our estimates prove correct, the reduced impact on radar would open up sites around the world.

As we move forward with the Wing 7 program, we are integrating sensors and procedures to understand and predict the reliability of the Makani system. We have developed detailed hardware-in-the-loop simulations that test the entire system before the wing leaves the ground, and using this infrastructure, we can insert simulated failures to test how the system will react when things do not go as planned. Strain gauges and accelerometers are being integrated into critical parts of the wing to provide precise information about wing loading and to analyze structural fatigue. With these techniques, we improve the functionality of Wing 7 and demonstrate the fundamental system viability needed to design the commercial scale wings.

—Corwin Hardham, CEO

Ask Damon: What Keeps the Wing Aloft? 

One of the first questions we’re often asked at Makani is “how does the wing stay up in the air?” The short answer is that the air flow over the wing creates lift to keep the wing aloft. For the long answer, our Chief Engineer, Damon Vander Lind, explains the basic function of our wing in terms of energy conservation here.

Dynamixel Servo Showdown

As Makani moves towards longer flight times, we have to make sure that all the parts we use can survive the extended use. Over the last few months we pitted the Dynamixel RX-64 servos currently on the wing against the EX-106 servos. Our website has more details on our testing program and the results.

Notable Press

This quarter we especially love the coverage by The Atlantic (stay tuned for episodes 2 & 3), as well as this story in FastCompany. Also, we cannot resist mentioning that Corwin was featured wearing a tux and holding the tail of W7 in none other than Italian Men's Vogue.
Tufts installed along the pylon indicate that airflow is unimpeded across new, more aerodynamic motor pylons during a recent test in California's Bay Area.

Three Insights on the Cost of Wind Power

The International Energy Agency has released a comprehensive study on the past and future cost of wind energy. The report is a useful resource for anyone interested in the path that wind power has taken, and the road ahead over the next several decades. Makani’s business team lead, Alden Woodrow, highlights three important data points from the report. To go directly to the pdf report click here. 

Olympic Hopeful?

Makani Power was envisioned by a group of avid kiteboarders. Now one of Makani's kiteboarding mechanical engineers may have a chance to go to the Olympics. The International Sailing Federation made kiteboarding  an Olympic sport in May and Johnny Heineken, a member of Makani's structures team, is the top ranked men's kiteboarder world wide. Click here to read an article featuring Johnny and his friends contemplating the effects of this recognition. 

Eric's Notebook

Recently, we began a series of photographs documenting the notebooks of the Makani staff inspired by the journals of inventor Alexander Graham Bell. This month we asked Avionics team lead Eric Chin (left) for a glimpse into his series. Eric has been at Makani since 2008, and carefully records the span of dates for each old notebook as he starts a new one. The pages [on our site] were taken from two different books. Eric is pictured here with Kenny Jensen, setting up a hardware in the loop test.
Copyright © 2012 Makani Power, All rights reserved.
Thank you for signing up to receive our newsletter via our website.
Our mailing address is:
Makani Power
2175 Monarch Street
Control Tower
Alameda, CA 94501

Add us to your address book




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6694 From: Doug Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: Re: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Personally, I don't think radar obstruction is a valid excuse for not proceeding. It is a tail-wagging-the-dog issue. Nice that radar could be used to see what was in the sky yesterday. The solution would be to improve the radar of last century, or replace it with a system that can handle what is airborne in the 21st century. Get up to date or get out of the way.

When you think about it, any such old technology can be cited as a big ball-and-chain to stop all progress, period. Did we stop developing the car because veterinarians didn't know how to work on them? Geeez, now that I think of it, I'm glad veterinarians weren't unionized!

---
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6695 From: mmarchitti Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: LadderMills and Carousels //Re: [AWES] Re: Alexander Bolonkin
Probably we all agree on the basics. Infact the present working developments is aiming at a much lower power, with a continuity with the mobile gen, that reached 40-50kW, and it could have also reached 100kW; but at that power people on the cab could have risked injuries because forces were very high, P[W] = F[N]*V[m/s].

The dimensioning power for the present plant does not interfere with your sound suggestion: "very small working developmental prototypes to prevalidate every aspect of operation, before risking a full-scale system." As I told you, the plant will generate at the beginning a little more then the mobile gen. Infact the present generator inside the stem are almost of the same power of those on the mobile, and the newer will work at a reduced power. You know, the same bridge can allow the transit of a bicicle and of a truck.

I could not find the SkySails mast launching method being applied to their fixed energy farm concept. Also I could not figure out the ring on a pole concept for the take off. I someone here can offer me the right link...

Since I am intersted in technology and green energy I would be happy if more and more actors and competitors arrive in that field. And I hope that that interest will speed up development and a new era for energy resources.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6696 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/18/2012
Subject: SkySails Power
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6697 From: Doug Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: economics of YoYo Power thought experiment
Let's say you have available, at ground level, a pulling force, on a cable, moving at the speed of a kite yo-yo generating scheme. Let's say the force can be of any magnitude, at zero cost:
1) Could the numbers pencil out for generating power at less than 4 cents/kWh?
2) How? Describe the mechanism.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6698 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update
An extended period of wonderful rain showers is passing here in Austin, with the sunbaked heat due to return. The "Mothra1" fifty-tarp kite is essentially complete, having taken rather longer than first imagined to properly work out. While its materials and methods are simple, the rigging tricks and overall ensemble proved quite complex.
At the local Valley Way Hay Farm, we dug four anchor holes to three feet with a 12" auger mounted on an Ag tractor PTO and placed the anchor hardware. Could this be the overdue first fixed AWE Kite Farm anchor installation?  The Kite-Grass Hybrid Energy Farm idea is being put into practice. No material impact is foreseen on hay production from the kite gear. There is a site concern about mud during wet weather impacting kite operations. The  vehicle swallowing soil-type is a sticky black gumbo with a thin thatch surface and sparse Johnson and Bermuda Grass that endured the deep drought last year.

The surface Cableway Traveler turned out nice, industrial hardware to last a lifetime, enabling rotation of the arch up 40 deg along a 100' ground-cableway. Thus, for rolling and belaying the arch around a large circle, with eight or so anchors, every position is covered. But we did not sink the entire anchor circle, counting on a prevailing summer wind direction of 130 to 180 here to allow validation of the weathercocking feature. with only one set of three anchors.. A portage cart puts the ~100kg kite on wheels, for easy one-person handling. Some techniques have been figured out; like how to reorient a giant kite laid out on the field (roll it up, move the roll on wheels, then unroll in the new position).
 
The kite has been delivered to the field. We will encamp as long as needed to get a maiden flight and build some flight hours. The weak winds, with convective instabilities, should provide a nice mix of tame and challenging conditions to explore.
 

 
"One of these mornin's you gonna rise up singin'
You gonna spread your little wings and you'll take to the sky"
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6699 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Outside expert observers of Makani Power expect a mix of secrecy and hype. One relies on small clues and established VC patterns to guess what is really going on. Its known that Makani  has a high burn-rate and struggles to attract new investment as its prototypes also struggle (and seem to fail) to complete essential tests.
 
This Update contains a rare major new disclosure, that Makani has accepted Army SBIR funds. Military funding is a sort last resort survival strategy for many Bay Area ventures, as the ruling hipster elites (and most of the world) look down on "military industrialism". Makani's founding circle, SquidLabs, had even disavowed further military funding a decade ago, after first gaining major revenue from a partnership developing parafoil robots ("swarms of smart bombs"- ATAIR). So we can presume they were rather desperate to keep the lights on at the leased US Naval Base with the latest contract. Or maybe they were militaristically oriented all along; after all, ARPA-E is a military modeled R&D program.
 
Like the ARPA-E Makani contract, this one sounds like yet another little taxpayer funded boondoggle. Who, except for Corwin*, can doubt that all-carbon airframes, pancake motors, conductive tethers, and corner-reflector details, looping by the hundreds at altitudes far above conventional wind turbines, will constitute a huge radar clutter effect? Is anyone in this project pointing out that competing "all dielectric" architectures avoid all these negative factors? Worst of all, radar studies are a premature distractive sideshow, a real loss of focus on basic AWE. It may even be that the Army is using Wing7 as a worst-case test plane for new radars.
 
Gone are the confident Makani predictions that the company would be poised to launch an M600 prototype in the next year or so. Instead we have weird "Ask Damon" explanations of "lift", as if Wikipedia did not do a better job explaining basic aeronautics. The featured servo-showdown to meet an ARPA-E braindead 100hr requirement is also a false trail, since a mini-conference, but hopes it can limit skeptical non-member industry participation. Thus "our" next industry conference might be a small closed affair as a PR fig-leaf before AWEC2013 in Berlin. When will the AWEC founding-elite machinations end? When more new industry players catch on. Many seem quite unaware of the ongoing effects of Makani's and AWEC's backroom decision-making.
 
While we don't want our friends at Makani Power (and other AWEC principals) to fail outright, adding even more damage to a skewed AWE public image, we also should beware a Makani that survives a wilderness exile in Army SBIR land to re-surge with its old VC shark ethos. I continue to pressure for cooperative partnerships with Makani/AWEC whereby technical losers are vetted but everybody is given a chance to rally around the winning architectures, as determined by real due diligence.
 
 
* "The lower frontal area of the Makani system, combined with the thin wing skin is expected to offer a reduced radar cross section compared to conventional turbines." Corwin. 
 
(radar reflectance is more a function of high-conductive area and surfaces geometry, not thickness per se)

  
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6700 From: harry valentine Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Dave S.,

You've raised some very interesting points .  .  .  . the military is increasing their use of renewable green energy. The US Navy has recently introduced a diesel-battery-electric hybrid ship into service, a retrofit of an earlier diesel-electric power system.

They're definitely interested in wind power, especially wind power technology that can keep generating power throughout a severe wind storm. One option would be a super-strong kite technology made from composite materials and carbon-nanopaper.

They may also be willing to test out a ducted wind turbine, one where the duct is adjustable and can maintain a steady mass flow rate of air through the wind turbine, regardless of wind speed. The Air Force has operated jet aircraft with rectangular intakes that include 'dump gates' to divert excess air mass away from engine intakes .  .  .  . so they know that technology quite well.

Be interesting to see how Makani technology holds up during severe wind conditions, when the army base would just like the wind turbines to continue to generate electric power.


Harry


To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: santos137@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:06:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [AWES] Fwd: Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

 

Outside expert observers of Makani Power expect a mix of secrecy and hype. One relies on small clues and established VC patterns to guess what is really going on. Its known that Makani  has a high burn-rate and struggles to attract new investment as its prototypes also struggle (and seem to fail) to complete essential tests.
 
This Update contains a rare major new disclosure, that Makani has accepted Army SBIR funds. Military funding is a sort last resort survival strategy for many Bay Area ventures, as the ruling hipster elites (and most of the world) look down on "military industrialism". Makani's founding circle, SquidLabs, had even disavowed further military funding a decade ago, after first gaining major revenue from a partnership developing parafoil robots ("swarms of smart bombs"- ATAIR). So we can presume they were rather desperate to keep the lights on at the leased US Naval Base with the latest contract. Or maybe they were militaristically oriented all along; after all, ARPA-E is a military modeled R&D program.
 
Like the ARPA-E Makani contract, this one sounds like yet another little taxpayer funded boondoggle. Who, except for Corwin*, can doubt that all-carbon airframes, pancake motors, conductive tethers, and corner-reflector details, looping by the hundreds at altitudes far above conventional wind turbines, will constitute a huge radar clutter effect? Is anyone in this project pointing out that competing "all dielectric" architectures avoid all these negative factors? Worst of all, radar studies are a premature distractive sideshow, a real loss of focus on basic AWE. It may even be that the Army is using Wing7 as a worst-case test plane for new radars.
 
Gone are the confident Makani predictions that the company would be poised to launch an M600 prototype in the next year or so. Instead we have weird "Ask Damon" explanations of "lift", as if Wikipedia did not do a better job explaining basic aeronautics. The featured servo-showdown to meet an ARPA-E braindead 100hr requirement is also a false trail, since a mini-conference, but hopes it can limit skeptical non-member industry participation. Thus "our" next industry conference might be a small closed affair as a PR fig-leaf before AWEC2013 in Berlin. When will the AWEC founding-elite machinations end? When more new industry players catch on. Many seem quite unaware of the ongoing effects of Makani's and AWEC's backroom decision-making.
 
While we don't want our friends at Makani Power (and other AWEC principals) to fail outright, adding even more damage to a skewed AWE public image, we also should beware a Makani that survives a wilderness exile in Army SBIR land to re-surge with its old VC shark ethos. I continue to pressure for cooperative partnerships with Makani/AWEC whereby technical losers are vetted but everybody is given a chance to rally around the winning architectures, as determined by real due diligence.
 
 
* "The lower frontal area of the Makani system, combined with the thin wing skin is expected to offer a reduced radar cross section compared to conventional turbines." Corwin. 
 
(radar reflectance is more a function of high-conductive area and surfaces geometry, not thickness per se)

  

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6701 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Harry,
 
You seem to overlook the strong case against US military R&D (link below) for a global AWE movement.
 
The military (lamely) uses its renewables push as "hearts and minds"  psyops warfare for the rest of us. Even as the military remains the dirtiest single energy actor, the greenwash strategy is working. Greenwash propaganda is consistent with classic military doctrine, were warfighting is based on deception.
 
The Army is a very ironic choice for an R&D partner if one's AWES is a jumbo offshore airplane. The Makani life-support contract is more a case of government waste. There is no clear engineering science rationale, no real upside at all
 
Watch as the military-industrial sector consistently fails to create products well adapted to real human needs, even if their high-dollar hype always claims otherwise. Watch the dollars, count the bodies... study history. Watch weak Mil-Spec AWE players languish in peace markets, even as they profit owners from government largess,
 
daveS
 
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned the U.S. about the "military-industrial complex" in his farewell address. ... in later drafts of Eisenhower's speech, a ...
  
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6702 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Cool New KiteMotors from Util and KiteLab Austin
Util and KiteLab Austin are working closely together as partners toward a range of AWES offerings. A new series of AWES groundgen developmental prototypes is being prepared for evaluation under the new 300m2 arch, as a scale working kite farm. After Austin testing, a US tour is planned, and then an EU stint perhaps starting at Dieppe, then maybe Calabria, Isle of Lewis, etc. Live Music will be a key application.
 
Here is the first scale device (~500W) of the latest family to show off in a cell-phone video by talented Util engineering manager, Ed Sapir, who also did most of the work. Note our signature Austin techne style, developed over many years. Its not a production or true scale model, but a creative study for more robust units next in the pipeline-
 
 
 
 
 
Stay tuned for more "kitemotors" and many new power extraction wings and turbines, suited to hang from the big arch, that will drive these workcells.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6703 From: harry valentine Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Hi Dave,


I do agree with your perspective.

I have seen government investment fail many times 

- Gov't made easy money available to start-up high-tech companied during the 1990's "to create a perpetual economic boom", except all that government money created dozens of companies that developed products and services for which there was very little market. The result was the Dot-com bust and high-tech meltdown.

- Massive Gov't investment in Green Energy in Iceland, Spain and Ireland did not save those countries' economies from going the way og Greece .  .  .  there is now a green energy meltdown underway in many parts of the world.

- For almost 30-years, the US Gov't commandeered development of the Stirling-cycle engine, dumping in US$-millions to increase its output and raise its efficiency .  .  .  .  all that investment achieved next-to-nothing. More recently, the US Gov't has "invested heavily" into further development of the thermo-acoustic engine that converts heat to low-frequency sound waves in a pressure tube, that then drives a linear alternator to produce electric power at thermal efficiencies of some 60%.

I have seen private entrepreneurs achieve amazing results while operating on very limited, private funding budgets. 

Under present economic conditions, many governments may have to abandon programs that provide funding to politically suitable scientific and technical projects. The fallout may open doors for privately funded entrepreneurs who achieve amazing results on shoestring budgets.

Some privately developed AWE technology that develops power at below grid prices, could find a market in rural areas from residents who would invest in competitively priced technology .  .  .  . including some small-site, off-grid power technology.


Harry


To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: santos137@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:40:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [AWES] Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power

 

Harry,
 
You seem to overlook the strong case against US military R&D (link below) for a global AWE movement.
 
The military (lamely) uses its renewables push as "hearts and minds"  psyops warfare for the rest of us. Even as the military remains the dirtiest single energy actor, the greenwash strategy is working. Greenwash propaganda is consistent with classic military doctrine, were warfighting is based on deception.
 
The Army is a very ironic choice for an R&D partner if one's AWES is a jumbo offshore airplane. The Makani life-support contract is more a case of government waste. There is no clear engineering science rationale, no real upside at all
 
Watch as the military-industrial sector consistently fails to create products well adapted to real human needs, even if their high-dollar hype always claims otherwise. Watch the dollars, count the bodies... study history. Watch weak Mil-Spec AWE players languish in peace markets, even as they profit owners from government largess,
 
daveS
 
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned the U.S. about the "military-industrial complex" in his farewell address. ... in later drafts of Eisenhower's speech, a ...
  

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6704 From: dave santos Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Open AWE's Anthem? "Kite Song" was inspired by Austin Kite Fest: "ma
Countdown to Mothra1 Maiden Flight continues. 
 
Posting a little kite note to fill the wait-

=============================================

For some of us "Kite Song", by the major folk music star, Patty Griffith, is the AWE Anthem. Its KiteLab Austin's shared spirit, they spring from the same roots, a small Central Texas counter-culture based in Austin. Patty will be taking a continued role in AWE (via common friends). 



Some years ago, Patty introduced "Kite Song" like this: 

"You may have noticed these beautiful kites we have hanging from the stage here, and we're kind of doing a kite thing, and I'll tell you how that all came about.  This next song, called Kite Song, was inspired by a friend of mine, walking on the lake in Austin.  There's a place called Town Lake in Austin, TX, where we both live, and we happened upon a huge kite festival (Zilker Kite Fest, oldest in US) - this was just a few days before the United States invaded Iraq - there was a lot of anxiety in the air and lots of worries and she looked up and said, 'Wouldn't it be great if we all had kites that we were flying instead of bombs we're dropping or guns we're shooting?'  And I thought, 'well, you know, that's such a great idea.'  It's one of those ideas that nobody ever thinks could work, and that's why it never works, but I think we should give it a shot.  It turns out we're not the only ones thinking this way.  Rick Taylor, the stage manager, was
looking at kites on the web and found out that there's different movements about flying kites for peace all over the world (One Sky).  So, we're not the first people to think about this.  That's cool." 



"Kite Song"


The Sunday after there was laughter in the air
Everybody had a kite
They were flying everywhere
And all the trouble went away
And it wasn't just a dream
All the trouble went away
And it wasn't just a dream

In the middle of the night
We try and try with all our mights
To light a little light down here
In the middle of the night
We dream of a million kites
Flying high above
The sadness and the fear

Little sister just remember
As you wander through the blue
The little kite that you sent flying
On a sunny afternoon
Made of something light as nothing
Made of joy that matters too
How the little dreams we dream
Are all we can really do

In the middle of the night
The world turns with all of it's might
A little diamond colored blue
In the middle of the night

We keep sending little kites
Until a little light gets through
 
 
Some find Patty's original version schmaltzy, but she is a magical songster.
For those critics, there will be many less sweet harder versions by cover artists-
 

 
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6705 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Open AWE's Anthem? "Kite Song" was inspired by Austin Kite Fest:
Kite Song by Patty Griffin    Video    

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6706 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Couldn't agree more.

Send this to Rand Paul. It may help straighten out the idiots in DC.

Chris
On Jul 20, 2012, at 3:33 AM, harry valentine wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6707 From: Bob Stuart Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
The times I have had government financing, up to half of it was wasted in matching the criteria.  It could have gone higher, if I had been so inclined.
Once, I happened upon some guys carrying in furniture for a new government aid to small business program office.  I followed the crew in, and found one of the suits, to ask for a brochure on their criteria or something.  Caught off guard, he let slip that the money was already gone, but they still had to spend the budget to pretend that they had considered other proposals.  
It is probably impossible for a government program to direct research effectively.  Wherever there are unknowns, political skills can easily trump technical ones, and opportunities are as unpredictable as meteors.
Private fortunes, OTOH, are a very inefficient and pernicious way to make research possible.  
Systems engineering might suggest that the government try to tax the successful innovations that have gotten out of hand or need replacement, and fund research through universities, and by grants to the lowest bidding private researchers.  The main requirement would be to fill a gap in Wikipedia with solid data that could stand peer review.  It would be easy to get expense money for apparatus, often recycled, and the wages would be set by how many hours were devoted to chasing that year's allocation.  Posting the main part of plans that led to a new industry would be rewarded with opportunity for more ambitious new work, not royalties for old work.  This would maximize friendly cooperation while still recognizing talent.  
While we are at it, it might be nice to set a uniform rate for all unproductive people, giving copyright lawyers the same disposable income as cripples.  

Bob Stuart
at least my head is in the clouds. . 

On 19-Jul-12, at 8:33 PM, harry valentine wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6708 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6709 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6710 From: christopher carlin Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Army funds - Airborne Wind Tech Update from Makani Power
Dear Bob,

This certainly isn't a technical discussion but I do enjoy it.

I certainly agree with your first two paragraphs and I must say private fortunes, Thomas Edison is perhaps the exception that proves the rule, tend to fund whatever their owner thinks is a bright idea having one bright idea to make the fortune doesn't mean subsequent ideas will be good. Look at Microsoft which after Windows and Office seems to have stagnated.

However I don't think getting the government involved, beyond funding research on things which the government really needs, is a good idea. Successful ideas come from enthusiastic individuals who see a need and are motivated either by profit or self satisfaction to create a solution. Having "angel Investors" motivated by favorable tax rules to support the innovators is the other key ingredient. It's an approach that works time and time again and eliminates all kind of government waste and overhead.

Regards,

Chris   
On Jul 20, 2012, at 5:06 AM, Bob Stuart wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 6711 From: Joe Faust Date: 7/19/2012
Subject: Re: Final Countdown- 300m2 Tarp Kite Update