Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.  #58 to 110
Page 2 of 552.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 58 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 59 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 60 From: harry valentine Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 61 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Fw: Re: [AirborneWindEnergy] Re: Cheap Practical AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 62 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 63 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 64 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 65 From: dave santos Date: 4/7/2009
Subject: Membrane WingMills- AWE Eureka?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 66 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/8/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 67 From: mike fallwell Date: 4/8/2009
Subject: (no subject)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 68 From: spiralairfoil Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 69 From: dave santos Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 70 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 71 From: dave santos Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 72 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 73 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/10/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 74 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/10/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 75 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/10/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 76 From: dave santos Date: 4/10/2009
Subject: UAV Reliability Study

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 77 From: dave santos Date: 4/11/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 78 From: harry valentine Date: 4/11/2009
Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 79 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/11/2009
Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 80 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/11/2009
Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 81 From: dave santos Date: 4/11/2009
Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 82 From: harry valentine Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 83 From: dave santos Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 84 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 85 From: Dave Culp Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 86 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 87 From: dave santos Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 88 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/12/2009
Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 89 From: Grant Calverley Date: 4/13/2009
Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 90 From: dave santos Date: 4/13/2009
Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 91 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/13/2009
Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 92 From: Grant Calverley Date: 4/13/2009
Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 93 From: spiralairfoil Date: 4/14/2009
Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 94 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/15/2009
Subject: Earth airspace regulations (EARs)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 95 From: dave santos Date: 4/17/2009
Subject: AWE Kite NOTAM

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 96 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/17/2009
Subject: Re: AWE Kite NOTAM

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 97 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/20/2009
Subject: Eric Schmidt

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 98 From: dave santos Date: 4/23/2009
Subject: High-Speed Sprag Recoil

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 101 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/24/2009
Subject: Group image posting practice and test

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 103 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
Subject: Offer to members: Host images, files

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 104 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
Subject: Re: Offer to members: Host images, files

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 105 From: dave santos Date: 4/25/2009
Subject: Open Platform KitePorts

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 106 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
Subject: Wafting lever

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 107 From: dave santos Date: 4/25/2009
Subject: Re: Wafting lever

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 108 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/26/2009
Subject: Re: Wafting lever

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 109 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/27/2009
Subject: Re: Wafting lever

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 110 From: x x Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: diy laddermill




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 58 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE

  Excellent point on the lightning issue allthough now you just triggered the Gerble in my head spinning on some new ideas on how that power could be harnessed. My dad worked with some folks who had made some attempts many decades ago but I just had an idea that they may not have tried regarding the many ways to store and convert energy. I'll keep you posted.

-brooks (and the gerble that controlls him)


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 59 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE
Mike,
 
The referenced post was a semantic abstract, not a technical specification. Specs are available online off JoeF's AWE site.
 
If you are asking about Lifter Kites, standard types like Morse Sled & KiteShip's OL are used. Specs are published. DaveC or i can answer specifics.
 
If you are asking about Membrane Wingmills-

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 60 From: harry valentine Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning
Hi Brooks,
 
 
You'll need some incredibly large capacitors to store a charge of lightniing . . . . or even multiple strikes.
 
 
Harry
 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: brooksdesign@peoplepc.com
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:42:15 -0600
Subject: RE: [AirborneWindEnergy] Cheap Practical AWE

  Excellent point on the lightning issue allthough now you just triggered the Gerble in my head spinning on some new ideas on how that power could be harnessed. My dad worked with some folks who had made some attempts many decades ago but I just had an idea that they may not have tried regarding the many ways to store and convert energy. I'll keep you posted.
-brooks (and the gerble that controlls him)





Windows Live Messenger makes it easier to stay in touch – learn how!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 61 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Fw: Re: [AirborneWindEnergy] Re: Cheap Practical AWE
Mike,
 
Whoops, forgot your wingloading answer-

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 62 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

When I said "new ideas they may not have thought of " it was a hint to the common method of extracting/storing energy via direct electric energy is not the only form of energy that can be extracted from a lightning strike. Giant capacitors would probably be the most efficient if they could be charged fast enough to absorb that energy but as someone who has restored old buildings with damaged lightning rods I can tell you energy can be take many forms. I'll have to check my my chief number cruncher to see if the projects he worked on could do the job as well as the methods that have been tried by the electrical extract/storage method. There has been some research in the direction I'm thinking but not public common knowledge. I'll have to check on how public before I say more.

-brooks


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 63 From: dave santos Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning
The fatal problem with lightning power is low capacity factor & high capital cost of the equipment, which overwhelmingly sits idle but has to be massive to handle brief peaks.
 
Persistent atmospheric charge across altitude seems too diffuse to usefully collect by any sort of flying conductive web. Convective cells are big capacitors & might conceivably be discharged at a reasonable capacity factor (pulsed ionizing energy beams)?, but not anytime soon.
 
Synthetic lines in a non-saline atmosphere are not lighting attractive. Aerostats have woven metal jackets on their tethers to handle lightning. Lightning arrestors are bypass conductors that will protect a kiteboat or ground generator from damage.
 
Ultra capacitors are generally only cost effective as load/supply leveling
 buffers, not as primary storage. Composite structure can double as capacitor. Ultra capacitor airframes might charge/discharge by contacting along skycable networks.
 
Wind power AWE will be far more practical for a long time than secondary energy harvests such as from solar thin-film or static-charges. Piezo hummer ribbon mesh might be a "solid state" collector someday. A wing yanking on a generator is current best option.
 
 
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 64 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/6/2009
Subject: Re: Cheap Practical AWE - lightning

No debate here on all these points, Harry just got the Gerble running on that treadmill in my head but I have some new ideas on the storage and transmission of energy. Actualy old ideas revisited with a twist.

-brooks


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 65 From: dave santos Date: 4/7/2009
Subject: Membrane WingMills- AWE Eureka?
WingMills are oscillating foils that extract energy from flow. A University of Kyoto team dubbed the principle Controlled Aerodynamic Instability. Various researchers have documented good performance in experiments & calculated potential is very high*.
 
But solid WingMills are contraptions & have the same severe scaling limits & high capital cost of wind turbines. Membrane WingMills, on the other hand, are ultra-simple tensile sling or tape structures with the lowest cost & mass of any known wind power collector. They are light enough to be ideal for Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) suspended by Lifter Kites or simply hang them from structures or terrain.
 
There varied approaches to membrane WingMills. KiteLab's advanced AWE FlipWing is a quality Membrane WingMill semi-captive on a small section of a long line that achieves high sweep & high efficiency. Its highly contoured, battened, turbulated, & eddy-fringed. By contrast a primitive flutter-tape, basically a kite "hummer", is a totally captive simple uncontoured ribbon along its full length, with narrow sweep & low aerodynamic efficiency.
 
Fundamentally the FlipWing is two-line "reversible" C-kite stretched out to the superior higher-lift flat geometry of a multi-bridled bow-kite, but, being single skin, is lower mass & way cheaper. Its a forward swept wing, X-29 DNA makes it want to oscillate. Its also a thin wing, an ultimate hot requirement. Its mass is so low is accelerates like a gunshot & turns on a dime, little phase space is lost in tacking. These glorified rags will eventually achieve the 500kph desired for extreme AWE performance.

 

The FlipWing was conceived as a fishtail or bird "run backwards", but is un bird/fish-like in key ways, such as tip tethering, & has foil optimizations for its true forward direction. LE turbulators promote attached flow, much like wing slots, at high AoA parts of the sweep cycle, a row of small holes inspired by Joe Hadziki's Rev invention story of burning holes with a cigarette. They "soften" the LE, easing self-tacking.
 
Fluttertape wastes a lot of energy vibrating torsionally in higher modes. FlipWing battens solve this, but they don't aggregate power in the precise inverse function of fishtail bones, which disperse power into a fluid medium, instead the tethers receive & transmit power.
 
Swept battens stiffen the wing torsionally so that it tacks fully first mode harmonic, despite aeroelastic noise & wind-field turbulence. Without the battens & loadpaths a dynamic wagner field saps energy aeroacoustically in a zoo of faraday wave & chladni patterns. 
 
FlipWing scaling seems driven by batten limits, 10m is practical with solid battens & 20m airbeams should allow 300m FlipWing spans. KiteShip's giant OL kite can lift such a power wing with a potential rating of several mw, far beyond WindBelts. Such a prototype could be fielded quickly with a FlipWing from recut maxi-yacht headsails. The OL would need a bit of tail reinforce to support FlipWing yanking. 
 
A trove of formal numerical & experimental validation exists for the high performance KiteLab is seeing in its FlipWing prototypes.
=======================================

* sample citation-

The wingmill - An oscillating-wing windmill

In: Wind Energy Conference, Boulder, Colo., April 9-11, 1980, Technical Papers. (A80-28801 10-44) New York, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
 
"This paper describes an analytical and experimental investigation of a windmill which utilizes a harmonically-oscillating wing to extract wind energy. A theoretical analysis was developed utilizing unsteady-wing aerodynamics from aeroelasticity and the results guided the design of a working model for wind-tunnel experiments. For the cases tested, theory and experiment compared favorably, and showed the wingmill to be capable of efficiencies comparable to those of the best rotary designs."
 
=========================================
 
Its very exciting is how problems of solid WingMills are solved by Membrane WingMills. A nagging problem of solid WingMills is self-starting & control. Membrane WingMills naturally self-start & self-oscillate, but the solid version has often required a "bump" to start & active controls to cycle.
 
Wayne German's visionary study of Tethered Foil potential inspired KiteLab Membrane WingMill progress. DaveC laid down for me a set of constraints any decent kite system must resolvve. Billy Roeseler's ribbon-wing study, & the stability analysis of a soft-wing's elastic axis, informed the FlipWing aeroelastic tuning. One key feature of KiteLab's FlipWings is the low stretch catenary line that runs along the TE. Thus the LE is intentionally more elastic, promoting instability.
  
KiteLab's FlipWIng project was delayed by ground mechanics development. First the ancient bowdrill was made to drive a generator & a sprag/flywheel COTS upgrade modernized the mechanism. KiteLab has now logged over 1000 wind hours running FlipWings under lifter kites, off structures, & in trees, with zero failures..
 
Ansar Ander's 100m ribbon kite provided a clue to fluttertape limitations, it never could get a high flying angle. Another clue is that primitive C & bow kites suffer from high AOA drag along the centerspan.
 
FlipWings are designed to scale & be hot. They derive from my early WingMills dating to the 80's, as Brooks will remember, but are now soft & kite lofted.
 
DaveC, asked about the cutout center & avoiding excess centerspan AoA is just one of its several functions. The curious heart shape is a kiter's NACA duct, standard geometry for a stable vent hole.In this case the hole allows the wing a fold zone, easier tacking at window's edge, & also reduces drag of a C- kite centerspan, where a tendency to high AoA adds drag.
 
Jayent suggested that a curved plate wing is a cost-to-performance winner in many apps & the latest FlipWings have tuned  forechord elasticity to develop a good LE curve while remaining essentially a cheap membrane. Spanwise loadpaths allow a stable wagner tension field to develop that closely approximates an optimized thickened foil. These quiltlike bumps pop out on whichever surface is upper, according to tack. 
 
TE fringe serves an eddy flap function & turbulator holes along LE are also incorporated, details pretty much on faith. This is VooDoo, but it seems to work. Upcoming de Prony brake measurements across the parametric wing set will clarify matters.
 
In summary- the Membrane WingMill self-oscillating by controlled instability is the simplest, lightest, & cheapest wind energy ever.  A grand future beckons.
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 66 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/8/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 67 From: mike fallwell Date: 4/8/2009
Subject: (no subject)
span, 80 or 160 feet
wing loading,  100 lb/sq.ft
air foils, aluminum or RP 46
cables, RP 46
speeds, 100 - 120mph
power, 1 -4 MW
L/D, 10
weight, 4,000 - 12000 lbs
scale limits 10 MW
and materials. aluminum, RP 46

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 68 From: spiralairfoil Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Liteweight Generator
www.carbonconcepts.co.uk/downloads/genbroch0306.pdf
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 69 From: dave santos Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays
======Released to Public Domain as a DRAFT========
 
A 3D web of kite elements, called KiteMesh, allows vast Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) arrays in the least airspace at the lowest cost & highest safety. KiteMesh most closely approaches a KiteField Betz limit of any AWE approach. Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays can consist of LifterKites of about 1000sq m & multi megawatt Membrane WingMills or other power elements operating semi-captive in close proximity without interfering.
 
Membrane WingMills can hang off KiteMesh vertices without fouling. Traditional three-way line swivels allow LifterKites to be attached midway along geodesic lines, bridled clear of vertices, so that fouling is prevented. Updated self-launching Morse Sled LifterKites enhanced with new anti-fouling details are the new standard for Passive Flight Automation. 
 
KiteMesh arrays enhance Passive Flight Automation by tolerating local perturbation & recovering, like ruffled feathers. Freeflying elements require much more clearance or tend to foul in cascading failure. KiteMesh is highly integrated, with all the advantages of lower operational costs, higher reliability, & greater scaling potential. Discrete kite arrays are disadvantaged.
 
KiteMesh does not rotate with wind veer. Its semi-captive lifter, drogue, & powerwing elements are locally free to weathervane. Nonrotating KiteMesh can translate a controlled distance downwind in any direction with rotating ground workcells following the motion of suspended WingMills, or the whole mesh can be snugged upwind to keep the mesh in register.
 
Layered KiteMesh can settle down by stages in lulls & relaunch gracefully using known kite design principles. Relaunch can cascade from a single-point relaunch element, like high speed winching against an aerostat, circling tow-pane, or ballistic pilot lifter. KiteMesh helps aggregate power inputs to ground-based WorkCells at high densities.
 
A KiteField is a layered groundplanes & airspace. A groundplane is usefully contoured with berms, wells, & trenches that prevent kite lines from interfering with vehicles, gear, & agriculture. Similarly railings & horizontal pole-strung barrage lines prevent ground fouling. Trenches & tunnels can hide conductors & other infrastructure from interference. Selected agriculture like biomass crops are KiteMesh compatible. Natural ecosystems like prairie might be compatible. Whole earth-built cites might thrive under KiteMesh. 
 
A KiteField groundplane is organized into aggregating power cells, grids of primary & secondary anchors. A KiteZone cell is naturally circular, usually on a square parcel, the corners free for support infrastructure like KiteSheds. A line of KiteZone cells across prevailing wind maximizes energy capture to infrastructure.
 
2000 ft has been suggested as an initial "high-altitude" AWE ceiling above most surface inversions & ground boundary-layer turbulence. KiteMesh scales are a good fit. KiteField cells of 2km across are a good proportion to a 2000 ft ceiling. Ten KiteField cells across a Class 4 wind resource is a gigawatt class installation.
 
A KiteField AirSpace is cylindrical volume of Restricted AirSpace. Kite mesh is a lenticular volume inside the cylindrical no-fly zone, the empty "rim" is a natural flight separation safety factor.
 
These ideas were inspired by kite festival displays based on large lifters & "line laundry". I am grateful the the World Kite Museum, & Director Kay Buesing, for access to classic kite arch & train lore. Special credit is due to great kite showfolk like Jim Patton, David Gomberg, & Peter Lynn, who have long mastered & shared proto KiteMesh techniques.
 
Thanks for any corrections, ideas, or critique.
 
====== KiteLab's Open-Source "Honor License" claimed on any original material above, no use by large closed-source IP players permitted =======
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 70 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays
I am familiar with the Betz limit as derived specifically for and applied to "wind turbine" technology, but have seen little in the way of derivations of same for more complex wind-energy utilization schemes.

It would seem that virtually every new "class of scheme" may have its own peculiar "Betz Limit"; so when you state "....KiteMesh most closely approaches a KiteField Betz limit of any AWE approach....", I presume you are privy to other Betz Limit explorations that have been done across the many schemes being proposed in the AWE field, thus a knowledge that the KiteMesh is exemplary in this regard.

I would be interested in references to such fascinating work.

DaveL


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 71 From: dave santos Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: Gigawatt KiteMesh Arrays
Although turbine inspired, the Betz Limit is presumed here to generally apply to any crosswind scheme according to its InFlow "footprint". A maximized KiteField of a given InFlow AirSpace needs to sweep its footprint as thoroughly as possible. Schemes were a little kite sweeps a big sky let a lot of capacity by, very low Betz.
 
Naturally any AWE array we can envision will have modest Betz performance compared to a turbine, probably around 20% extraction gives best ROI. That KiteMesh methods best fill a given "high-altitude" InFlow AirSpace is conjecture.
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 72 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/9/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen
Dear Dave,

Interesting - I find the statement that wind at 600 meters is nearly always present a bit surprising unless they has some specific location in mind.

Regards,

Chris
On Apr 8, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Dave Lang wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 73 From: Dave Lang Date: 4/10/2009
Subject: Re: KiteGen
Attachments :
    At 4:24 AM +0100 4/10/09, christopher carlin wrote:
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 74 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/10/2009
    Subject: Re: KiteGen

      I think the entanglement problem and no-wind problem could both be solved by using a very large train track loop as apposed to a carousel. Instead of having a bunch of physically linked cars to keep them spaced(too much power loss in friction to the dummy spacer cars) you could have each car have its own hybrid generator that when being pulled it would feed electrical power into the tracks and the on the upwind portion (and no wind)they would receive power from them. The track loop could be huge (many miles)and would not even need to be completely circular in fact a section the ran fairly straight in the direction of the most common prevailing wind would be most efficient. There could even be connecting tracks that could have other directions as straights for the different seasons, as well as side tracks for parking individual cars for maintenance and a launch/landing field.

      The robotic issue would not be nearly as difficult with the ability to have spacing greater than the line length to solve the entanglement problem as well as just having them at such high altitudes that the system would have plenty of time to react and recover plus each car could have its own kite pilot that could control through RC link to on kite control surfaces powered by minimal on kite generator.

    -brooks


    ________________________________________
    PeoplePC Online
    A better way to Internet
    http://www.peoplepc.com
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 75 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/10/2009
    Subject: Re: KiteGen

      It also just occurred to me that a sea based system could work with large battery tankers being towed by the kite and dragging the turbines or flippers for generation as has been suggested and the Dave S has already proven it is possible to have wind powered watercraft that sail directly into the wind (hey dave, I won another bet with the engineers at work last year on this, it never fails to amaze).

    -brooks


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 76 From: dave santos Date: 4/10/2009
    Subject: UAV Reliability Study
    UAV methods are not up to cheap reliable AWE anytime soon. Simpler more modest schemes are essential.
     
    This UAV Reliability Study link compliments the recent UAV Safety Study link-
     
    www.acq.osd.mil/uas/docs/reliabilitystudy.pdf

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 77 From: dave santos Date: 4/11/2009
    Subject: Re: KiteGen
    KiteGen Concept has grave flaws-
     
    Carousels are essentially VAWTs (vertical axis wind tur.), always a performance hit. KiteGen flight pattern does not maximize airspace. Capital Cost Intensity is super high for such a monster machine. Active control is bad enough without having to fly like iQuad team.
     
    Even if a KiteGen simply motors thru calm, robust landing/relaunching is essential around normal storm events. If just one string of kites crashes the whole shebang is down. One small kite problem may require stopping entire system. Kite crash becomes a dragline hazard as carousel flywheels along. All other kites can be wrapped by one crash.
     
    A common counter-rotating "gustnado" will tend to kill a KiteGen rather spectacularly a few times a year. Unlike a carousel, non "handed" geometries can counter negative (cyclonic) or postive (anticyclonic) helicity equally.
     
    But if they put the bobbing horseys back on, i'm for it...
     
    Re: circular/oval track schemes-
     
    These have VAWT sapping effect, running downwind & hauling upwind hurt, crosswind track best. Vehicles must take surge forces all along track & be able to relaunch/stop/pull-off/etc. from any position. Control complexity extreme. Track eats ground area.
     
     
     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 78 From: harry valentine Date: 4/11/2009
    Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study
    Within the not-too-distant future it may be possible to use flexible photovoltaic material tomake kites and/or balloons. The combination of airborne wind power plus airborne solar PV conversion could become an attractive and cost-competitive technology.
     
     
    Harry
     

    To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
    From: santos137@yahoo.com
    Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:02:51 -0700
    Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] UAV Reliability Study



    UAV methods are not up to cheap reliable AWE anytime soon. Simpler more modest schemes are essential.
     
    This UAV Reliability Study link compliments the recent UAV Safety Study link-
     
    www.acq.osd. mil/uas/docs/reliabilitystudy.pdf




    Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 79 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/11/2009
    Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study
    Dear Harry,

    Has anyone thought of putting piezo electric material on a fluttering kite. It could be effective using the right material.

    Regards,

    Chris
    On Apr 11, 2009, at 3:04 PM, harry valentine wrote:


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 80 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/11/2009
    Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study
    Dear Dave,

    Having been involved in developing a large 200 foot wingspan UAV in the 1980s I would suggest reliability or even feasibility is not a problem. Cost, complexity and management/support definitely are. 

    Regards,

    Chris    
    On Apr 11, 2009, at 7:02 AM, dave santos wrote:


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 81 From: dave santos Date: 4/11/2009
    Subject: Re: UAV Reliability Study
    Chris,
     
    Agreed, reliable is feasible, but not cheap. Kite Energy is predicted by some to be  "cheaper than coal", but reliable UAV's, while possible, are very expensive & will not pay for a long time.
     
    Airliners are now safer than the home bathtub, that's how safe UAVs must become in the NAS, as the first (safety) study asserts. At an order-of-magnitude UAV reliability improvement per decade, that's twenty years & still may not be cheap enough.
     
    So low-mass-aloft passive-control methods have a big window & may dominate, on cost basis, even after UAV refinement. UAV path may be the kiss-of-death as a biz model.
     
    Its nice to have a passive low-mass solutions in hand,
     
    daveS
     
    PS to list- "Low Reynolds" nemesis theory is just half of small UAV extra unreliability, small scale is a faster regime, realtime control is a bigger problem.
     
     
     
     
     



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 82 From: harry valentine Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric
    Hello Chris,
     
     
    The concept of airborne piezoelectric conversion on flutter kites certainly has merit. Based on experience in low power generation (under 5kW), piezoelectric conversion has shown to be more efficient that small wind turbines. I can certainly envision a potential market for airborne piezoelectric flutter kites in remote communities.
     
     
    Regards,
     
    Harry

     

    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
    From: christopher.m.carlin@btinternet.com
    Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:45:42 +0100
    Subject: Re: [AirborneWindEnergy] UAV Reliability Study



    Dear Harry,

    Has anyone thought of putting piezo electric material on a fluttering kite. It could be effective using the right material.

    Regards,

    Chris




    Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 83 From: dave santos Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric
    Challenges to Piezo-Kites include-

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 84 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

    Actually piezos need not but operated at ultrasonic frquencies to function but I do agree that the latice would be problematic and there is always that long cable issue. A ground based piezo based generator system would not be out of the question as a simple way to extract pulsing power without the need for the sprag ratchet and flywheel. I can easily see stacks of piezo elements outperforming a standard mechanical gen in investment cost and mainainance. A good article in Scientific American has a DIY on making them from Silicone sealant.

    -brooks


    ________________________________________
    PeoplePC Online
    A better way to Internet
    http://www.peoplepc.com
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 85 From: Dave Culp Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric
    Do you have a reference for this article, Brooks? Date and page, maybe? Or even a URL? Thanks!

    Dave

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 86 From: brooksdesign Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric

    It was mostly focused on the flexable actuator aspects but I know I have the zine in my stack, I'll dig it out and get back to you.

    -brooks


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 87 From: dave santos Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric
    Brooks,
     
    Of course piezo works at low Hz, but its like driving a sports car in a hospital zone, so "driving every piezo element at very high Hz to approach its thermodynamic limits" is clearly best kite mass-to-power.
     
    it seems a fundamental tradeoff- best piezo scale v. viscosity, bulk piezo grows too massive (quasi 3D (or fractional 2.n D) faster than good wings grow in area (quasi 2D).
    a pocket piezo AWE kite would be a cool milliwatt charger, but
    where do you get piezo kite fabric? 
     
    ds
     


    ____________ _________ _________ _________ _
    PeoplePC Online
    A better way to Internet
    http://www.peoplepc .com

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 88 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Flutter Kites - Piezoelectric
    Piezo textile? Some paths:
    http://tinyurl.com/piezoelectricTextile8888Lift

    Consider using aloft piezo gains to run smart matters aloft while resulting kite-line dynamics run ground-based energy generation.

    Lift,
    JoeF
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 89 From: Grant Calverley Date: 4/13/2009
    Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator
    Thanks for the link, looks like Carbon Concepts does some neat work in small scale carbon airfoils, spars,  wind generators and a a whole range of R and D projects.  The problem is they are in the UK.  Any one know of a similar company in the US, preferably in the Pacific NW?
    Thanks Grant


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 90 From: dave santos Date: 4/13/2009
    Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator
    Grant,
     
    On the advice of Professor Viswanathan, who attended the recent University of Texas AWE seminar, KLD Energy Technologies of Austin, TX, has approached our community about the kite energy application. 
     
    They have breakthrough thin-film nanocrystalline tech motor/generators & advanced controllers to provide a new efficiency standard in a low RPM, high frequency, transmissionless motor/generator tech.
     
    www.kldenergy.com

    Note- the website features only initial motor tech, the generator dev effort is underway behind the scenes, expect big news soon.
     
    Several of us AWE hackers are lining up as beta testers. Brooks is first in line, with a major project underway, & is local to the Austin-based company. Contact this list with a few details if you have a cool project in the 10kw range (200kw projected) that might be a good showcase for the new generators.
     
    dave santos
     
    KiteLab
    Ilwaco, WA
    Austin, TX
     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 91 From: christopher carlin Date: 4/13/2009
    Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator
    Try googling "scaled composites." They are mostly in the aircraft/drone business but a fairly innovative free wheeling outfit good at pursuing government money. They might be interesting to work with. Also find out who built "Slam" a big catamaran for Larry Ellison. It was built in Anacortes by a shipyard but involves some really fancy carbon fiber work. The mast is essentially a 150 foot high aspect ratio wing - could just as easily be a windmill blade. I imagine they could work to any scale you prefer.

    Why do you view the fact someone is in the UK as a problem? If you have a serious proposition to put to them I might be able to do some face to face work with them since I go to the UK twice a year.

    Regards,
    Chris 
    On Apr 13, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Grant Calverley wrote:


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 92 From: Grant Calverley Date: 4/13/2009
    Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator
     Joe,
     
    Thanks for the tips. Kld generator looks very interesting. It might be just the kind of thing we have been waiting for. I will be very interested in possible testing at some future date. More on that later
     
    Chris, thanks for the tips both Scaled Composites and Janicki Industries in Sedro Wooley (near Anacortes WA) look like A+ companies.  Way out of my league but I may just talk with them. Nothing ventured nothing gained. I like the Carbon Concepts company but have had problems with parts shipped from the UK in the past. Sedro Wooley is only about 40 miles from me so personal visits would be easy at Janicki. Looks like the owner is  into alternative energy, steam powered pellet burning buses, thats a plus.
     
    Thanks Grant
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 93 From: spiralairfoil Date: 4/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Liteweight Generator
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 94 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/15/2009
    Subject: Earth airspace regulations (EARs)
    New file:
    http://www.energykitesystems.net/airspace/index.html

    When anyone gets a related link for a nation's airspace regulation--especially relating to AWE uses, please send such to me for posting to the above file.

    AWEsome use of airspace,
    JoeF
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 95 From: dave santos Date: 4/17/2009
    Subject: AWE Kite NOTAM
    How odd, there seems to be no govt. record of required NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) for Makani's experiments on Maui & Alameda Islands. I was hoping to pinpoint dates for the claimed "first autonomous kite energy" flight(s), since Makani is still very much in "stealth mode".
     
    All AWE experimenters must comply with aviation safety regulations. A working committee has formed on the aviation integration issue; contact this list to participate.
     
    ds
     
     
    Draft KITE NOTAM format
     
    COORD 46 21 N 124 3 W (LONG BEACH, WA)
    FROM XXXXXXXXXX UTC
    To XXXXXXXXXXX UTC
    BETWEEN XXXX - XXXX DAILY
    KITE EXPERIMENTS
    1 NM RADIUS OF COORD 46 21 N 124 3 W
    SURFACE TO 500 FT AGL

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 96 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/17/2009
    Subject: Re: AWE Kite NOTAM
    Few points:
    1. I wonder how many kite-flying sessions have occurred in a manner in the world where a NOTAM may have been urged by the procedures of the various involved nations?

    2. Finding local NOTAMs may be challenging for those unpracticed in finding NOTAMs.

    3. Here is a doc for procedures related to Canada:
    http://www.navcanada.ca/ContentDefinitionFiles/Publications/NOTAM/NOTAM_Manual_en.pdf If this link breaks, copy/paste the full string carefully into browser. Adobe Reader is free online to read the 127 pages.

    4. http://www.faa.gov

    5. AWE participants are invited to e-mail me with links and comments for any nation's airspace for the following file:
    http://www.energykitesystems.net/airspace/index.html

    Lift,
    JoeF
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 97 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/20/2009
    Subject: Eric Schmidt

    == Dr. Eric Schmidt, Chairman and CEO of Google Inc: 

    My laconic capsules from his presentation:
        Smart grid needed now. And energy efficiency as resource now.  Performance-based standards for energy efficiency. Plug-in hybrids. Smart meters for homes. Open systems. Open standards. Fund university R& D.  Patent reform. Energy...need to get it right.  Engagement. Encourage debate. Embrace all.  Use the crowds.
      Vid2(48 MIN)        

     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 98 From: dave santos Date: 4/23/2009
    Subject: High-Speed Sprag Recoil
    I've been in contact with AWE devlopers, Brooks & JohnB in Austin, about a key element of sprag-based power collection. Sprag recoil resets the AWE mechanism for a new power stroke. Fast recoil of a low mass sprag maxes the power phase. FlipWings can be tuned to slow-tack after a fast sweep, by various trim inputs, but that reduces power cycle.
     
    If anyone can study the issue & come up with improved designs, it will enhance an already powerful approach. One question is what the fastest spring recoil is- air, steel, or rubber. Steel & air springs last longer, rubber is cheaper. Perhaps a hair-triggered boost force could kick the sprag into sudden higher speed recoil as the wing nears zero AoA & lowest line tension.
     
    Thanks to JohnB & HarryV for clues. To see sprags-
     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 101 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/24/2009
    Subject: Group image posting practice and test

     
    FlipperWing of February 2009, made and flown by Dave Santos.

    It seems a bit tricky to post online an image that will show online. This method for this post begins by choosing the New Beta Version of the editor offered. Then a small checkbox for "View HTML Source" can be checked to get to the HTML code where the special SRC tag is used with a carefully constructed URL made after one files in Files an image file with its image filename suffic appropriate to the image.   Here on this test:

    <IMG SRC="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AirborneWindEnergy/files/2009febflipper.jpg"

    was in plain text placed in the HTML view of the posting effort.

    End of test.        We yet need to test if motion files will work.

    Cheers,

    JoeF

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 103 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
    Subject: Offer to members: Host images, files
    All, if you do not have an easy web space to store sharable images and files, then send them to me and I will open a folder in your name and place the files and images in the folder. I will give you a list of the absolute URLs for the image files and document files. Then in your discussions and e-mails, you may simply copy/paste the full absolute URL in your paragraphs. The base domain will be http://EnergyKiteSystems.net/

    For example, here is a file in a folder named after David Shepard:
    http://EnergyKiteSystems.net/DavidHShepard/index.html

    When your folder gets several items, then I will form an index page from which you or your visitors may click to any or all of the files that you have placed in the folder.

    Steps:
    Send me some images and documents.

    And you may send me replacement documents that overwrite an old version. Documents can be plain text, PDFs, Word documents, jpg, gif, avi, mpg, png, html. I can convert Word documents to PDFs for a wider readership.

    The free service is to support the rapid development of airborne wind energy.

    Another example:

    http://EnergyKiteSystem.net/DaveSantos/kitmot5b.mpg

    is a short motion file in one of the member's folders.

    Best of lift to you and yours,
    Joe Faust
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 104 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
    Subject: Re: Offer to members: Host images, files
    To illustrate a common path to typo errors regarding URLs,
    please note :) the typo in the mpg file example in the prior post. To avoid such typos, there is a popular recommendation to achieve getting an URL in a browser line with proof that the URL is working. Then use mouse select tool or equivalent to copy the successfull URL to one's clipboard and then paste that full URL into the text of a post or e-mail; such practice avoids what just happened.

    Here is a tested URL to cover the typo whre an "s" was needed.

    http://EnergyKiteSystems.net/DaveSantos/kitmot5b.mpg

    This was was tested in a browser and the file was called.
    Then I copied and pasted the working URL to avoid the typo error.

    Enjoy the kite motor video.

    Joe Faust
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 105 From: dave santos Date: 4/25/2009
    Subject: Open Platform KitePorts
     
    A KiteZone aggregates AWE, just as airports are aviation hubs. The AWE "gold-rush" is on, we urgently need regional sites to gather community, develop safety, & share art, without interfering with existing air traffic. An Open Platform KitePort is a concept for a public KiteZone where many players operate kite elements in parallel. A KitePort serves as a cooperative umbrella for large capital-intense features like safety services, net-metered power generation, maintenance, & repairs.
     
    DIY KiteZones/KitePorts
     
    In previous posts AWE KiteZones were defined as structured airspace, anchor-fields, power aggregating nets, & so on. Seek out existing regional KiteZones. Kite sport & kite festival locations have established airspace presence that eases low altitude AWE acceptance. Aerostat sites, skydiving drop-zones, & ballooning centers can also fit-in a lot of AWE experimentation. Stay away from air traffic corridors, particularly airport approaches. Wind-Leases ease capital requirements. A KiteZone might generate high revenue with low-impact on the ground (esp. "hayfield" biomass), making it a desirable tenant.
     
    Small scale experiments & model aviation traditions practiced at low altitude are the current evolutionary paradise. "Bad wind" is actually best for debugging AWE. The toy kite zone, which varies by country from a low of 150ft (US) to a high of 100m (Ger.), is the proper nursery of most AWE research. If a concept can't be scale modeled at low altitude it has poor potential for major scaling up. A scaled-up KitePort could incubate small AWE on its grounds.
     
    KiteLab has two coastal locations developing to incubate pioneering AWE; in Texas (South Padre Island), & Washington State (Long Beach Peninsula). Anyone developing AWE is invited to visit or base at these experimental KitePorts. KiteLab is a pioneering AWE Fixed Base Operator (FBO), & will explore a complete range of services; hosting, flying, evaluating, maintenance/repair, training, consulting, etc.. 
     
    Future KitePorts
     
    A post-petroleum KitePort might have SkyElevators, laddermill-like cableway loops as common tethers that anyone can dock with & tug on or be towed aloft, as trade in AWE or raw "Lift". Commuter shuttle gliders could ride up to launch altitude & do "sled runs" for miles, returning by other SkyElevators. Skydiving might thrive from SkyElevators.
     
    Open Platform* SkyCables tugged by small private kite operators might power cities better & evolve more gracefully than centrally planned mono-systems. One might own & even live part-time aboard giant lifter/traction kites that migrate with seasonal winds between Open Platform KitePorts. A "communal" SkyCable could be an electrical conductor that multiple AWE generating units tie into, either persistently or momentarily discharging ultracapacitance.
     
    A long-term dream is that AWE operations co-exist with general aviation at the same airports as, say, a vast arch of energy kites over the primary runway. My airman dad, while confident AWE has a big place in the sky, worried that emergency landings & go-arounds might be endangered, so this idea is on hold; kites & planes won't mix well for a long time, until perfected ATC. Meanwhile we pursue what kite aviation can do now & how it can evolve into truly sustainable aviation.
     
     
    * Open Platform AWE- Revolutionary technologies like AWE develop fastest around an Open Platform specification. AWE consists of natural modules- wings, strings, work-cells, kite-zones, & so on. Properly defined module interfaces allow developers to design for integration with outside elements.
     

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 106 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/25/2009
    Subject: Wafting lever
    Looking at one of Dave Santos' kitemotor launches before the lifter actually lifted the kitemotor left a rod wobbling on the ground; that gave me a flash idea that I sketched:

    http://EnergyKiteSystems.net/JoeFaust/AWE/leverwaft.jpg

    We will see variations of this at KitePorts around the world.

    Joe Faust
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 107 From: dave santos Date: 4/25/2009
    Subject: Re: Wafting lever
    Good Eye, Joe. 
     
    Your "Wafting Lever" is best-yet geometry, horizontal-axis (downwind-axis) crosswind-power, keeps gen on ground, etc..
     
    We've been wafting our lever/crank schemes (Kite Gen, WPI, MarcR et al, KiteLab, etc.) in the wrong planes!
     
     
    Notes-
     
    Guessing best Wafting Lever crosswind plane slightly tilted upwind
     
    No active control required for Wafting Lever; to drive SingleLineKite (SLK) can passive "hunt" (small sweeps) or a FlipWIng under a lifter can sweep fast & wide. 
     
    Single Anchor w/ vertical pivot base will work, use downwind wheelbase to counter lever torque
     
        
     


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 108 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/26/2009
    Subject: Re: Wafting lever
    This note from Dave Santos
    seems to fit this thread:

    http://www.EnergyKiteSystems.net/DaveSantos/hisweep.mpg

    Attached FlipWing video taken at low altitude in the gusty lee of a hill, these wings run like a metronome in a steady breeze to pump or generate electricity. This wing & lifter kite made from Tyvek to crank a small generator. Now able to passive control sweep of Membrane Wing-Mill to cover whole kite window. The tack speed is also passive controllable, a bit fast on this wing.

    Cross-Wind Power without active controls!

    daveS
    KiteLab


    ======================================================
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 109 From: Joe Faust Date: 4/27/2009
    Subject: Re: Wafting lever
    Using Dave Santos' nomenclature furtherance from his e-mail forwarding we get evolution from bare wafting lever to controlled kite driven "tipping boom" and even ballasted "dipping boom." And the distant anchoring of kite line can use less ground by bringing the anchor right at the grounded generator. Some forward downwind wheeling might be involved in some variations; let the driven shaft free-sit in the wheel. Trussing the boom might reduce ground use and provide firm hold of driven shaft. Dave Santos suggested ballasting the boom for improved kinematics. I now would like to suppress "wafting" and reserve "wafting" for less-controlled wings in wind, like an energy-generating wafting vertical wing or wind-buffeted high broad fence, etc. I rather like to move toward Dave's "tipping boom" where the crosswind power drives the boom to tip one way and then the other.
    A second sketch begins to bring only some of this forward:

    http://EnergyKiteSystems.net/JoeFaust/AWE/ballastedtippingboom.jpg

    Capture both directions of the crosswind drive via a sprag clutch complex. The perpendicularity of the drive to the driven makes for efficient coupling from one energy field to the generated energy field.
    Collaborative effort in open-source ...
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 110 From: x x Date: 5/1/2009
    Subject: diy laddermill
    Hello from a new member.
    I'm investigating into computer vision (I am a programmer) as a way to govern a kite system .
    As I guess this is a minor problem compared to hardware setting I am here to ask for guidance.
    I need to figure out what sort of servo motors configuration is needed for flight  control of a 10 square meters kite from ground.