Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                          AWES 26690 to 26739 Page 425 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26690 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26691 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26692 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26693 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26694 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26695 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26696 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26697 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26698 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Defining "Active Lift"?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26699 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26700 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26701 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26702 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26703 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26704 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26705 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26706 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26707 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26708 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26709 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26710 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26711 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26712 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26713 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26714 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26715 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26716 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26717 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26718 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26719 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: If not, then not

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26720 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26721 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26722 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26723 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26724 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26725 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26726 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26727 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26728 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26729 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26730 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26731 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26732 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26733 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26734 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26735 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26736 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26737 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26738 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26739 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26690 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
Attachments :

    No, Dave, you are repeating your same mistake dozens of times. You see looping in a wind gradient in both cases – for the DS glider and the Cyclo-Kite. So you conclude, incorrectly, that they must be based on a common principle, which you claim is DS. That is incorrect. You have failed to show why the Cyclo-Kite uses DS. All you can do is endless repeat your false claim. You do not understand DS. Yet, amazingly, you declare that you are an expert in DS. That claim is also preposterous. You are an expert in BS.

    PeterS

     

    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 8:28 AM
    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

     

     

    Peter, the Wikipedia animation shows how a looping aircraft in a gradient gets a boost. The cyclokite was flying in a gradient on the beach, with close dynamic similarity to the animation.

     

    Lets agree that's BS to you, but you won't get a better explanation.

     

    On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎10‎:‎16‎:‎41‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26691 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: If not, then not
    DaveS, nice notice! Seems logically correct to me. You brought up a scenario of "not slowing the wind" while achieving a conversion to a new form of energy by accelerating the wind by energy input for a resultant of plasma.    So, the claim as stated at the start does not cover all ground; tweaking is apparently needed. 

    Perhaps: Without accelerating the wind by a Device, ..... etc. 
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26692 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: If not, then not
    Doug

    Note the difference between your word substitution of "extracting" for Joe's "converting". They are not the same. My logic applies to "converting".



     

    Dear daveS:  The idea that the wind is slowed when extracting kinetic energy from the wind is long-recognized.
    One more first-grade concept.  After 12 years of supposed wind energy research?  And you're still trying to figure out the ABC's?  Really?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26693 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
    Has a proof been put up on the table that the beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26694 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
    Sorry PeterS, 

    The Active Lift concept does not seem well defined, but the hardware is. Yes, we look at hardware closely, and will be patient for the pure concept to be better defined.

    Define yourself if you can.



     

    No, Dave, you’ve got it wrong again. You fail to separate the concept from the hardware. The concept of Active Lift is what is of interest to AWE, not the specific hardware of the Active Lift Tubine..

    PeterS

     

    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 8:22 AM
    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

     

     

    PeterS, Comparing AWES concepts and hardware is what we do here, dumb or not.. The ALT compares very poorly with power kites by just offering first-party theory and your "breakthrough" claim, but no proper comparison data. Skepticism in AWE is well based on known low power-to-weight of VAWT class. Power kites are the highest power-to-weight of known flying WECS.

     

    Sorry you think using the power kite in AWE for baseline data is dumb liar nonsense. Its really not.

     

    On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎10‎:‎11‎:‎58‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26695 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
    Let Doug say something informed on the DS topic, rather than blow smoke about anything else.



     




    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@...
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26696 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: If not, then not
    I think you two are insane.  I do not think your conversation has any bearing on AWE.  I do not believe you two have any idea what you re even talking about.  As usual, you two are attempting to establish "expert" status in the art of developing new wind energy solutions, without developing any wind energy solutions.  Your best attempt is to inject doubt through injections of nonsense.  As I've long-stated here, your combined strategy seems to be "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit."  Even that is impossible for you guys, as you are already baffled yourselves by the whole topic, and drowning in your own bullshit.



    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  

    Dear daveS:  The idea that the wind is slowed when extracting kinetic energy from the wind is long-recognized.
    One more first-grade concept.  After 12 years of supposed wind energy research?  And you're still trying to figure out the ABC's?  Really?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26697 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: If not, then not
    Doug, be patient. See if we don't circle back on some real insight in AWE. Often we do.



     

    I think you two are insane.  I do not think your conversation has any bearing on AWE.  I do not believe you two have any idea what you re even talking about.  As usual, you two are attempting to establish "expert" status in the art of developing new wind energy solutions, without developing any wind energy solutions.  Your best attempt is to inject doubt through injections of nonsense.  As I've long-stated here, your combined strategy seems to be "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit."  Even that is impossible for you guys, as you are already baffled yourselves by the whole topic, and drowning in your own bullshit.



    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  

    Dear daveS:  The idea that the wind is slowed when extracting kinetic energy from the wind is long-recognized.
    One more first-grade concept.  After 12 years of supposed wind energy research?  And you're still trying to figure out the ABC's?  Really?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26698 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Defining "Active Lift"?
    This topic is for sharing any definition of Active Lift that could pass muster in Wikipedia or NASA lexicons.

    Example for Static Lift-

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26699 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
    "The topic" was extracting energy from the wind, converting it to electricity, using no tower, as of 12 years ago.
    My most basic comment on "DS" is it has always stood for "Doug Selsam".
    If I had anything to add about dynamic soaring, I would.  Unlike you, I do not feel a compulsion to dominate topics I have no relevant thoughts on.  I say let you guys have fun touching on every known topic in Wikipedia.  When you've gone through every topic, you can start over and repeat them all as you two have been doing for some time now.  It is not changing anything.
    What you are still attempting after 12 years of no power is to overcome that by how many times you can post on your own website.  The number is infinite.  If you posted an infinite number of times, it would still not help.


    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  




    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@... #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976activity span .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 dd.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 dd.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 dd.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976last p span.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 div#ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 .ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 input, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1905930056 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976 #ygrps-yiv-1905930056ygrps-yiv-127189434yiv6156946976ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;}
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26700 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
    Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
    Attachments :

      Hi PierreB,

      You seem to be ignoring that the blades of the Active Lift Turbine do not move downwind relative to the central axis of the VAWT. So the blades are not moving downwind in the same way that a reel-out kite moves downwind.

      The invention is finding a way to obtain the benefits of moving downwind without the losses. That is what is different about the ALT. The relative motion to accomplish that is difficult to understand and most ingenious.

      The key to understanding the ALT is, in my opinion, to see that the blades do move downwind, but only relative to the upwind gear, not to the central axis of the VAWT.

      PeterS

       

      From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
      Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:07 AM
      To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

       

       

      Hi PeterS,

       

      Yes. I precise a reeling flygen would be concerned, lossing tangential force during reel-out phase. 

      My idea is that by using active lift, we loss tangential force. So a prototype of an ALT VAWT or a complete simulation would be needed in order to validate the ALT concept. 

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26701 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
      Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
      Attachments :

        No, Dave, you are just repeating your error. You don’t understand DS.

        PeterS

         

        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:08 AM
        To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

         

         

        Great Source JoeF. Should help PeterS with his issues concerning DS low altitude and "blocking (only)" definition. This text jumped out-

         

        " Deittert et al. show that the probability of winds that permit dynamic soaring by small uavs exceeds 50% in the southern oceans, and this probability is roughly 90% for albatrosses.4 The dierence is because albatrosses can descend to very low altitude (dragging a wingtip in the water) and uavs must maintain a significant safety margin. "

         

        Peter's Cyclokite similarly flies very low, where he claims wind gradient hurts his performance.

         

        PeterS, keep and open mind about whether we can prove to you anything. We have not given up so fast, but continue to offer you evidence.

        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26702 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
        Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
        Attachments :

          No, Dave, you are wrong again. VAWT blades do not lose “time” in a headwind and downwind phase states. Show me your diagram. What you are saying does not seem to correlate with reality.

          PeterS

           

          From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
          Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:15 AM
          To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

           

           

          Like Reeling AWES wings, classic VAWT motion requires blade mass to lose time in headwind and downwind phase-states. AWES and HAWT design options include pure crosswind travel modes.

           

          On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎07‎:‎03‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, pierre-benhaiem@orange.fr [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26703 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
          Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
          Attachments :

            DaveS,

            Just as I suspected: you can’t define the terms you use. In engineering and science, it is expected of everyone that they be able to define their terms. Like DougS says, you are still trying to learn the A, B, Cs of wind energy.

            PeterS

             

            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:26 AM
            To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: RE: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

             

             

            Peter,

             

            I rely on standard or casual usage by third parties like Wikipedia and aeronautical engineers. 

             

            You just tend to claim "nonsense" if I do otherwise.

             

             

            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26704 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
            Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
            The topic here is DS as a subset of DL, not as claimed by Doug.



             

            "The topic" was extracting energy from the wind, converting it to electricity, using no tower, as of 12 years ago.
            My most basic comment on "DS" is it has always stood for "Doug Selsam".
            If I had anything to add about dynamic soaring, I would.  Unlike you, I do not feel a compulsion to dominate topics I have no relevant thoughts on.  I say let you guys have fun touching on every known topic in Wikipedia.  When you've gone through every topic, you can start over and repeat them all as you two have been doing for some time now.  It is not changing anything.
            What you are still attempting after 12 years of no power is to overcome that by how many times you can post on your own website.  The number is infinite.  If you posted an infinite number of times, it would still not help.


            ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  




            ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@...
            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26705 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
            Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
            Peter,

            Rely on Wikipedia and the other sources provided you. Its Ok you do not accept my DS statements, just go with sources you can accept.



             

            No, Dave, you are just repeating your error. You don’t understand DS.

            PeterS

             

            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:08 AM
            To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

             

             

            Great Source JoeF. Should help PeterS with his issues concerning DS low altitude and "blocking (only)" definition. This text jumped out-

             

            " Deittert et al. show that the probability of winds that permit dynamic soaring by small uavs exceeds 50% in the southern oceans, and this probability is roughly 90% for albatrosses.4 The dierence is because albatrosses can descend to very low altitude (dragging a wingtip in the water) and uavs must maintain a significant safety margin. "

             

            Peter's Cyclokite similarly flies very low, where he claims wind gradient hurts his performance.

             

            PeterS, keep and open mind about whether we can prove to you anything. We have not given up so fast, but continue to offer you evidence.

            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26706 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
            Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
            Phase time is real time. As each blade passes thru direct headwind phase, its not making power; that's lost time compared to the phase cycle of a HAWT, for comparison.

            Don't expect diagrams from those whose efforts you do not credit. We credit your efforts.



             

            No, Dave, you are wrong again. VAWT blades do not lose “time” in a headwind and downwind phase states. Show me your diagram. What you are saying does not seem to correlate with reality.

            PeterS

             

            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:15 AM
            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

             

             

            Like Reeling AWES wings, classic VAWT motion requires blade mass to lose time in headwind and downwind phase-states. AWES and HAWT design options include pure crosswind travel modes.

             

            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎07‎:‎03‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, pierre-benhaiem@orange.fr [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26707 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
            Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
            Its accepted practice to define one's technical terms by reference to a standard dictionary. Allow me that virtue.



             

            The topic here is DS as a subset of DL, not as claimed by Doug..

            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎58‎:‎30‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com


             

            "The topic" was extracting energy from the wind, converting it to electricity, using no tower, as of 12 years ago.
            My most basic comment on "DS" is it has always stood for "Doug Selsam".
            If I had anything to add about dynamic soaring, I would.  Unlike you, I do not feel a compulsion to dominate topics I have no relevant thoughts on.  I say let you guys have fun touching on every known topic in Wikipedia.  When you've gone through every topic, you can start over and repeat them all as you two have been doing for some time now.  It is not changing anything.
            What you are still attempting after 12 years of no power is to overcome that by how many times you can post on your own website.  The number is infinite.  If you posted an infinite number of times, it would still not help.


            ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  




            ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@...
            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26708 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
            Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
            Attachments :

              DougS,

              This morning I went to put on my shoes and discovered that DaveS had lifted the lifts from my shoes and called it dynamic soaring as he flew out the door.

              PeterS

               

              From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
              Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:31 AM
              To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
              Subject: RE: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

               

               

               



              ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@...

              Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26709 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
              Subject: Re: If not, then not
              Where this topic is leading is a closer look at "WECS" as a term of art. The novel bit here is that we are identifying an overlooked class of devices to take wind and convert it in ways not yet classified.

              Now up-conversion is found plausible, without violating thermodynamics. A parcel of wind can be removed from a wind field, causing the remaining wind to accelerate into the breech. That parcel can be itself accelerated into a plasma beam, as a dramatic starting example. Yes it takes a net energy loss to create these WECS and meet JoeF's challenge here, but the basic insight is sound.

              Doug raises a good point in wishing "extraction" be the topic. Lets now define WEES for extraction cases, and explore the relation to WECS. Readers should be patient with the natural pace of discovering and sorting knowledge, that takes fully as long as needed.



               

              Doug, be patient. See if we don't circle back on some real insight in AWE. Often we do.

              On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎49‎:‎35‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com


               

              I think you two are insane.  I do not think your conversation has any bearing on AWE.  I do not believe you two have any idea what you re even talking about.  As usual, you two are attempting to establish "expert" status in the art of developing new wind energy solutions, without developing any wind energy solutions.  Your best attempt is to inject doubt through injections of nonsense.  As I've long-stated here, your combined strategy seems to be "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit."  Even that is impossible for you guys, as you are already baffled yourselves by the whole topic, and drowning in your own bullshit.



              ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...  

              Dear daveS:  The idea that the wind is slowed when extracting kinetic energy from the wind is long-recognized.
              One more first-grade concept.  After 12 years of supposed wind energy research?  And you're still trying to figure out the ABC's?  Really?
              Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26710 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
              Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
              No Peter, that does not meet the criteria of the Wikipedia DS article. Can't we all agree WP's a proper source? I cite them fairly. That's poor cause for mocking.



               

              DougS,

              This morning I went to put on my shoes and discovered that DaveS had lifted the lifts from my shoes and called it dynamic soaring as he flew out the door.

              PeterS

               

              From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
              Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:31 AM
              To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
              Subject: RE: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

               

               

               



              ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@...

              Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26711 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
              Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
              Attachments :

                JoeF,

                Yes. I have shown that the Cyclo-Kite does not make use of DS. In fact, it functions in a manner that is substantially the opposite of the way that a DS glider functions.

                A DS glider absolutely requires a large difference in wind speed between the top and bottom of its orbit. The Cyclo-Kite does not. It works normally when there is no wind gradient. Place a DS glider in a context where there is no wind gradient, and it fails to function at all. So clearly, the two devices are not based on the same principle.

                Since you are asking if “some DS is occurring”, I assume that you can clearly define DS. Please do so, so that I can be sure I know what you are talking about.

                PeterS

                 

                 

                From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:40 AM
                To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                Subject: RE: [AWES] Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

                 

                 

                Has a proof been put up on the table that the beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring?

                Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26712 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                Attachments :

                  DaveS,

                  I have explained Active Lift many times, so you must have simply ignored what I said. I think that the concept is too difficult for you to understand. It requires dealing with relative motions, and that is something you can’t do very well at all.

                  PeterS

                   

                  From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                  Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:42 AM
                  To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                  Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                   

                   

                  Sorry PeterS, 

                   

                  The Active Lift concept does not seem well defined, but the hardware is. Yes, we look at hardware closely, and will be patient for the pure concept to be better defined.

                   

                  Define yourself if you can.

                   

                  On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎27‎:‎10‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                  Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26713 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                  Subject: Re: If not, then not
                  Attachments :

                    Hi DougS, Thanks for the good laugh.

                    PeterS

                     

                    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:49 AM
                    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                    Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: If not, then not

                     

                     

                    I think you two are insane.  I do not think your conversation has any bearing on AWE.  I do not believe you two have any idea what you re even talking about.  As usual, you two are attempting to establish "expert" status in the art of developing new wind energy solutions, without developing any wind energy solutions.  Your best attempt is to inject doubt through injections of nonsense.  As I've long-stated here, your combined strategy seems to be "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit."  Even that is impossible for you guys, as you are already baffled yourselves by the whole topic, and drowning in your own bullshit.

                     



                    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...

                    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26714 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
                    Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                    Hi PeterS,

                    You wrote: "The key to understanding the ALT is, in my opinion, to see that the blades do move downwind, but only relative to the upwind gear, not to the central axis of the VAWT."

                    You seem to be ignoring I mentioned several times the central axis xx' (tangential force) and the upwind axis yy' (lift force). Note that both axis are within the stationary wheel in the last patent (see the figure 1), yy' being in its center, xx' being in the center of the turbine.

                    Concerning the technical means: I don't know how the same wheel can transmit two specific (lift and tangential) forces in two axis from the same blades. 
                    Concerning the ALT principle: at least a simulation is required in order to validate ALT claims.
                    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26715 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                    Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                    Attachments :

                      DaveS, You are saying things that make no sense. DS is not a subset of DL. If you insist it is, then define your terms and show the subset you are talking about.

                      PeterS

                       

                      From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                      Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:09 AM
                      To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                      Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                       

                       

                      The topic here is DS as a subset of DL, not as claimed by Doug..

                       

                      On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎58‎:‎30‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26716 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                      Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
                      Attachments :

                        DaveS, I do go to the sources and they all indicate that you are wrong.

                        PeterS

                         

                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:12 AM
                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

                         

                         

                        Peter,

                         

                        Rely on Wikipedia and the other sources provided you. Its Ok you do not accept my DS statements, just go with sources you can accept.

                         

                        On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎00‎:‎39‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26717 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                        Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                        JoeF asked for "proof...beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring."

                        Peter, 

                        Are you claiming you have made the formal proof desired, to professional standard? I don't claim any proof, only make a prediction of DS.



                         

                        JoeF,

                        Yes. I have shown that the Cyclo-Kite does not make use of DS. In fact, it functions in a manner that is substantially the opposite of the way that a DS glider functions.

                        A DS glider absolutely requires a large difference in wind speed between the top and bottom of its orbit. The Cyclo-Kite does not. It works normally when there is no wind gradient. Place a DS glider in a context where there is no wind gradient, and it fails to function at all. So clearly, the two devices are not based on the same principle.

                        Since you are asking if “some DS is occurring”, I assume that you can clearly define DS. Please do so, so that I can be sure I know what you are talking about.

                        PeterS

                         

                         

                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:40 AM
                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: RE: [AWES] Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

                         

                         

                        Has a proof been put up on the table that the beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring?

                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26718 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
                        Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                        JoeF wrote: "Has a proof been put up on the table that the beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring?"

                        Yes. A flying elephant is not a Cyclo-Turbine. So a flying elephant is DS. So DS doesn't work like a Cyclo-Turbine.
                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26719 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                        Subject: Re: If not, then not
                        Wishing we could thank the happy mockers for a technical defense of confusing "extraction" with "conversion".

                         



                         

                        Hi DougS, Thanks for the good laugh.

                        PeterS

                         

                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:49 AM
                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: If not, then not

                         

                         

                        I think you two are insane.  I do not think your conversation has any bearing on AWE.  I do not believe you two have any idea what you re even talking about.  As usual, you two are attempting to establish "expert" status in the art of developing new wind energy solutions, without developing any wind energy solutions.  Your best attempt is to inject doubt through injections of nonsense.  As I've long-stated here, your combined strategy seems to be "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit."  Even that is impossible for you guys, as you are already baffled yourselves by the whole topic, and drowning in your own bullshit.

                         



                        ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <santos137@...

                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26720 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                        Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                        Attachments :

                          DaveS,  I see. You are saying that a VAWT blade does not produce power when heading directly into the wind. And then you are saying that it does not use all of the time that it is rotating to produce power, which follows from your first observation. If that is what you are saying, you are correct. And welcome to VAWT kindergarten.

                          However, if you are implying that a VAWT produces less power than a VAWT due to that lost time producing power, you are incorrect. You don’t understand VAWT. A VAWT blade sweeps the swept area twice each revolution, while a HAWT blade sweeps the swept area only once per revolution. That creates some advantages. The available current evidence is that VAWT are more powerful than HAWT (see Adams and Chen who tested a cycloturbine VAWT with a Cp of .52). Furthermore, VAWT can make use of rotor tipping and paired counter-rotation, which together add up to a predicted (not yet demonstrated) 50% increase in power. So it may be possible to build a VAWT that achieves a power output that is equivalent to a Cp of .75 or more.

                          PeterS

                           

                          From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                          Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:16 AM
                          To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                           

                           

                          Phase time is real time. As each blade passes thru direct headwind phase, its not making power; that's lost time compared to the phase cycle of a HAWT, for comparison.

                           

                          Don't expect diagrams from those whose efforts you do not credit. We credit your efforts.

                           

                          On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎04‎:‎38‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26721 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                          Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                          PeterS, Learn to live with what is written about DL without doing you any special favor. Had been less grumpy, your demands would be happily responded.

                          To give you a little perk, DL is any case of Lift not better classified as Static Lift, as defined by WP's categories.



                           

                          DaveS, You are saying things that make no sense. DS is not a subset of DL. If you insist it is, then define your terms and show the subset you are talking about.

                          PeterS

                           

                          From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                          Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:09 AM
                          To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                           

                           

                          The topic here is DS as a subset of DL, not as claimed by Doug..

                           

                          On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎58‎:‎30‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CDT, dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                          Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26722 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                          Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                          Attachments :

                            No, DaveS, you are quite naïve. WP contains many errors. It serves as a good starting point, but it would be foolish to cite it as evidence, due to those errors. On DS, they seem to be accurate, if incomplete, since DS is quite complicated if one considers all of the variations.

                            PeterS

                             

                             

                            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:35 AM
                            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                            Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                             

                             

                            No Peter, that does not meet the criteria of the Wikipedia DS article. Can't we all agree WP's a proper source? I cite them fairly. That's poor cause for mocking.

                             

                            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎20‎:‎55‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26723 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                            Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
                            I agree with the DS sources, just don't see the personalized indications.



                             

                            DaveS, I do go to the sources and they all indicate that you are wrong.

                            PeterS

                             

                            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:12 AM
                            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                            Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

                             

                             

                            Peter,

                             

                            Rely on Wikipedia and the other sources provided you. Its Ok you do not accept my DS statements, just go with sources you can accept.

                             

                            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎00‎:‎39‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26724 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                            Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                            Of course my comments apply to VAWT blades, as stated. The losses do sum overall.

                            Just one of many reasons supposed for VAWT's not gaining ground in the commercial HAWT revolution.



                             

                            DaveS,  I see. You are saying that a VAWT blade does not produce power when heading directly into the wind. And then you are saying that it does not use all of the time that it is rotating to produce power, which follows from your first observation. If that is what you are saying, you are correct. And welcome to VAWT kindergarten.

                            However, if you are implying that a VAWT produces less power than a VAWT due to that lost time producing power, you are incorrect. You don’t understand VAWT. A VAWT blade sweeps the swept area twice each revolution, while a HAWT blade sweeps the swept area only once per revolution. That creates some advantages.. The available current evidence is that VAWT are more powerful than HAWT (see Adams and Chen who tested a cycloturbine VAWT with a Cp of .52). Furthermore, VAWT can make use of rotor tipping and paired counter-rotation, which together add up to a predicted (not yet demonstrated) 50% increase in power. So it may be possible to build a VAWT that achieves a power output that is equivalent to a Cp of .75 or more.

                            PeterS

                             

                            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:16 AM
                            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                            Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                             

                             

                            Phase time is real time. As each blade passes thru direct headwind phase, its not making power; that's lost time compared to the phase cycle of a HAWT, for comparison.

                             

                            Don't expect diagrams from those whose efforts you do not credit. We credit your efforts.

                             

                            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎04‎:‎38‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26725 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                            Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                            Pierre. You seem to concede no serious proof exists by offering mockery instead.



                             

                            JoeF wrote: "Has a proof been put up on the table that the beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring?"


                            Yes. A flying elephant is not a Cyclo-Turbine. So a flying elephant is DS. So DS doesn't work like a Cyclo-Turbine.
                            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26726 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                            Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                            PeterS,

                            Its even shakier to suggest your own DS understanding is better than WP and the soaring pros. Its not to anyone else. What errors do you spot in WPDS?

                            We all make mistakes. DS is not your best subject. Dale Kramer is the top AWE DS expert.



                             

                            No, DaveS, you are quite naïve. WP contains many errors. It serves as a good starting point, but it would be foolish to cite it as evidence, due to those errors. On DS, they seem to be accurate, if incomplete, since DS is quite complicated if one considers all of the variations.

                            PeterS

                             

                             

                            From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                            Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:35 AM
                            To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                            Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                             

                             

                            No Peter, that does not meet the criteria of the Wikipedia DS article. Can't we all agree WP's a proper source? I cite them fairly. That's poor cause for mocking.

                             

                            On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎20‎:‎55‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                            Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26727 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                            Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                            Attachments :

                              Hi PierreB,

                              I can’t figure out what you think that I ignored. Yes, you mentioned the two different axis. Yes, they are both located within the stationary wheel (central hub). I see that. I’m not ignoring it.

                              Please note that the tangential force of the blades is transferred to the slide on the support arm. The downwind pressure on the blade is transferred to the satellite gear. So the two forces transmit force to the central shaft in two different ways, not the same way.

                              Yes, simulations are needed and testing is needed. Absolutely. If you have ever developed a product to sell, you know that it can take a very long time because there are so many things to consider and to do. I read that industrial inventions average roughly 10 years to go through all of the stages from conception to sales.

                              PeterS

                               

                              From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                              Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:45 AM
                              To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                              Subject: RE: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                               

                               

                              Hi PeterS,

                               

                              You wrote: "The key to understanding the ALT is, in my opinion, to see that the blades do move downwind, but only relative to the upwind gear, not to the central axis of the VAWT."

                               

                              You seem to be ignoring I mentioned several times the central axis xx' (tangential force) and the upwind axis yy' (lift force). Note that both axis are within the stationary wheel in the last patent (see the figure 1), yy' being in its center, xx' being in the center of the turbine.

                               

                              Concerning the technical means: I don't know how the same wheel can transmit two specific (lift and tangential) forces in two axis from the same blades. 

                              Concerning the ALT principle: at least a simulation is required in order to validate ALT claims.

                              Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26728 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                              Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                              Attachments :

                                DaveS, You don’t understand how science works. I’ve shown clearly that DS is not involved. You have not shown how it is involved, yet you claim that it is. The burden of proof is on you, not me. And you have offered no proof whatsoever.

                                PeterS

                                 

                                From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:04 AM
                                To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

                                 

                                 

                                JoeF asked for "proof...beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring."

                                 

                                Peter, 

                                 

                                Are you claiming you have made the formal proof desired, to professional standard? I don't claim any proof, only make a prediction of DS.

                                 

                                On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎46‎:‎57‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26729 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                                Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                                Attachments :

                                  DaveS, Again, no evidence.

                                  PeterS

                                   

                                  From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                  Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:15 AM
                                  To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                  Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                                   

                                   

                                  PeterS, Learn to live with what is written about DL without doing you any special favor. Had been less grumpy, your demands would be happily responded.

                                   

                                  To give you a little perk, DL is any case of Lift not better classified as Static Lift, as defined by WP's categories.

                                   

                                  On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎59‎:‎12‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                  Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26730 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                                  Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
                                  Attachments :

                                    DaveS, You are being simple minded again. You actually expect WP to explain to you why you are wrong about DS. What WP shows is a lack of any connection between DS and the Cyclo-Kite.

                                    PeterS

                                     

                                    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:20 AM
                                    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

                                     

                                     

                                    I agree with the DS sources, just don't see the personalized indications.

                                     

                                    On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎59‎:‎15‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26731 From: dougselsam Date: 6/28/2019
                                    Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                                    A 2-bladed H-A rotor sweeps its area twice with every rotation.
                                    A 3-bladed rotor, 3 times.
                                    A farm windmill, 22 times.
                                    Does not matter - a good broom can sweep the floor in one sweeping session, however any bristles it takes.

                                    Tilting a V-A machine increases its swept area, therefore even if more power is measured in a tilted state, does not increase power per unit swept area, and so does not increase Cp.

                                    Let's imagine a V-A turbine can make more power per unit swept area than an H-A machine.
                                    But if it takes 3 times the material, costs 3 times as much, and wears out 3 times faster (overly optimistic - probably wears out more like 10 times faster), and must be spaced out more in a windfarm thanks to slowing the wind more, where is the advantage?


                                    ---In AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com, <sharpencil@... filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoNormal, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoNormal, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 a:link, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 a:visited, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 code {font-family:"Courier New";} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 pre {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 tt {font-family:"Courier New";} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yiv7945515545msonormal, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yiv7945515545msonormal, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yiv7945515545msonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101attach, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101attach, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101attach {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial", sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101bold, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101bold, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101bold {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial", sans-serif;font-weight:bold;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101green, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101green, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101green {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;color:#628C2A;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101replbq, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101replbq, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101replbq {margin:3.0pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yshortcuts {} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad1, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad1, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad1 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad2, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad2, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101ad2 {margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:7.5pt;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 p.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline1, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 li.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline1, #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101underline1 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yshortcuts1 {font-family:"Verdana", sans-serif;font-weight:bold;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101yshortcuts2 {font-family:"Verdana", sans-serif;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 span.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101EmailStyle35 {font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;color:windowtext;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 .ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 div.ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101WordSection1 {} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Symbol;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:"Courier New";} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 filtered #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 {font-family:Wingdings;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 ol {margin-bottom:0in;} #ygrps-yiv-1472439130 #ygrps-yiv-1472439130ygrps-yiv-925545101 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}

                                    DaveS,  I see. You are saying that a VAWT blade does not produce power when heading directly into the wind. And then you are saying that it does not use all of the time that it is rotating to produce power, which follows from your first observation. If that is what you are saying, you are correct. And welcome to VAWT kindergarten.

                                    However, if you are implying that a VAWT produces less power than a VAWT due to that lost time producing power, you are incorrect. You don’t understand VAWT. A VAWT blade sweeps the swept area twice each revolution, while a HAWT blade sweeps the swept area only once per revolution. That creates some advantages. The available current evidence is that VAWT are more powerful than HAWT (see Adams and Chen who tested a cycloturbine VAWT with a Cp of .52). Furthermore, VAWT can make use of rotor tipping and paired counter-rotation, which together add up to a predicted (not yet demonstrated) 50% increase in power. So it may be possible to build a VAWT that achieves a power output that is equivalent to a Cp of .75 or more.

                                    PeterS

                                     

                                    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:16 AM
                                    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                                     

                                     

                                    Phase time is real time. As each blade passes thru direct headwind phase, its not making power; that's lost time compared to the phase cycle of a HAWT, for comparison.

                                     

                                    Don't expect diagrams from those whose efforts you do not credit. We credit your efforts.

                                     

                                    On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎04‎:‎38‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@... [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26732 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                                    Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                                    PeterS, 

                                    I am a scholar of science, and understand accordingly. Science works slowly and carerfully by testing peer claims against third-party peer replication and validated theory. Science is not about accepting at face value what you or I write.

                                    We have registered your science claims here on the record. Let time prove your ideas true or false, point-by-point, under scientific community standards, over many years. Those you insult cannot be depended on for that.





                                     

                                    DaveS, You don’t understand how science works. I’ve shown clearly that DS is not involved. You have not shown how it is involved, yet you claim that it is. The burden of proof is on you, not me. And you have offered no proof whatsoever.

                                    PeterS

                                     

                                    From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                    Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:04 AM
                                    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring

                                     

                                     

                                    JoeF asked for "proof....beach-video Cyclo-Kite does not have some DS ocurring."

                                     

                                    Peter, 

                                     

                                    Are you claiming you have made the formal proof desired, to professional standard? I don't claim any proof, only make a prediction of DS.

                                     

                                    On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎46‎:‎57‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26733 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                                    Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                                    Attachments :

                                      DaveS, VAWT actually are gaining ground. But there are many kinds of VAWT, and most of them are inherently limited by dynamic stall, a narrow and peaked Cp curve, and a low Cp max.

                                      Progress is very slow. There are multiple reasons for that.

                                      As for “the losses do sum overall”, you are wrong. I just gave you evidence that you are wrong and you deliberately ignored it.

                                      PeterS

                                       

                                       

                                       

                                      From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                      Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:24 AM
                                      To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                      Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                                       

                                       

                                      Of course my comments apply to VAWT blades, as stated. The losses do sum overall.

                                       

                                      Just one of many reasons supposed for VAWT's not gaining ground in the commercial HAWT revolution.

                                       

                                      On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎01‎:‎13‎:‎12‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26734 From: Peter Sharp Date: 6/28/2019
                                      Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                                      Attachments :

                                        DaveS, Since you can’t even define DS, you are not one to give advice.

                                        PeterS

                                         

                                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:30 AM
                                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                                         

                                         

                                        PeterS,

                                         

                                        Its even shakier to suggest your own DS understanding is better than WP and the soaring pros. Its not to anyone else. What errors do you spot in WPDS?

                                         

                                        We all make mistakes. DS is not your best subject. Dale Kramer is the top AWE DS expert.

                                         

                                        On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎01‎:‎19‎:‎19‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26735 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                                        Subject: Re: Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset
                                        PeterS, Just be patient. We will continue presenting evidence. Its not a deadline you can set.



                                         

                                        DaveS, Again, no evidence.

                                        PeterS

                                         

                                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:15 AM
                                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [AWES] Dynamic Lift as Dynamic Soaring Superset

                                         

                                         

                                        PeterS, Learn to live with what is written about DL without doing you any special favor. Had been less grumpy, your demands would be happily responded.

                                         

                                        To give you a little perk, DL is any case of Lift not better classified as Static Lift, as defined by WP's categories.

                                         

                                        On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎59‎:‎12‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26736 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                                        Subject: Re: DS Aeronautics Updated
                                        No I don't expect WP to prove me wrong about DS. As it stands, I agree with WP.



                                         

                                        DaveS, You are being simple minded again. You actually expect WP to explain to you why you are wrong about DS. What WP shows is a lack of any connection between DS and the Cyclo-Kite.

                                        PeterS

                                         

                                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:20 AM
                                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [AWES] DS Aeronautics Updated

                                         

                                         

                                        I agree with the DS sources, just don't see the personalized indications.

                                         

                                        On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎12‎:‎59‎:‎15‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26737 From: dave santos Date: 6/28/2019
                                        Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                                        The world wants to see VAWTs beat HAWTs by lower LCOE at utility-scale. Any data in that regard is helpful.



                                         

                                        DaveS, VAWT actually are gaining ground. But there are many kinds of VAWT, and most of them are inherently limited by dynamic stall, a narrow and peaked Cp curve, and a low Cp max.

                                        Progress is very slow. There are multiple reasons for that.

                                        As for “the losses do sum overall”, you are wrong. I just gave you evidence that you are wrong and you deliberately ignored it.

                                        PeterS

                                         

                                         

                                         

                                        From: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups..com [mailto:AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com]
                                        Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 11:24 AM
                                        To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [AWES] Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT

                                         

                                         

                                        Of course my comments apply to VAWT blades, as stated. The losses do sum overall.

                                         

                                        Just one of many reasons supposed for VAWT's not gaining ground in the commercial HAWT revolution.

                                         

                                        On ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎28‎, ‎2019‎ ‎01‎:‎13‎:‎12‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CDT, 'Peter Sharp' sharpencil@sbcglobal.net [AirborneWindEnergy] <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com

                                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26738 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
                                        Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Dynamic Soaring
                                        I am serious. As an elephant is large, there is wind gradient between his ears and his paws. 
                                        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 26739 From: benhaiemp Date: 6/28/2019
                                        Subject: Re: Active Lift Turbine VAWT
                                        Hi PeterS,

                                        Some details: 
                                        "Please note that the tangential force of the blades is transferred to the slide on the support arm" then the central axis (central shaft) xx'.

                                        "The downwind pressure on the blade is transferred to the satellite gear" then the axis yy'. Both axis are in the stationary wheel.

                                        "So the two forces transmit force to the central shaft in two different ways, not the same way." Not exactly as the lift force goes to the axis yy', and the tangential force goes to the central shaft (central axis xx'). 

                                        How the stationary wheel can transmit the lift force by yy' towards a generator, and the tangential force by xx' towards another generator, both forces coming from the same blade?