Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.                          AWES 20181 to 20231 Page 297 of 440.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20181 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20182 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Re: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20183 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Re: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20184 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2016
Subject: The current state of AWE R&D

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20185 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2016
Subject: Texas AWE Encampment Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20186 From: gordon_sp Date: 5/31/2016
Subject: Re: Texas AWE Encampment Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20187 From: dave santos Date: 5/31/2016
Subject: Re: Texas AWE Encampment Update

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20188 From: dave santos Date: 5/31/2016
Subject: Makani Wing7 at Bay Area Maker Faire

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20189 From: dave santos Date: 6/2/2016
Subject: Wind data above the Jet Stream (16km+)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20190 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/2/2016
Subject: One kind of electric kite winder

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20191 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Companies dedicated to making kite systems for specific uses

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20192 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Re: KIteWinder

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20193 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20194 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Olivier Van Oost

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20195 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Moving powered ground anchor launching kited wing

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20196 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: European Training Network AWESCO Launched

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20197 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
Subject: Wavy Arch

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20198 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
Subject: Powered anchor for kited wing Swift

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20199 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
Subject: US9178241 High altitude platform

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20200 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
Subject: Apparatus and method for transporting particles to the atmosphere

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20201 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/5/2016
Subject: US4832571 Flexible tethered wind turbine

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20202 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/6/2016
Subject: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20203 From: dougselsam Date: 6/6/2016
Subject: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20204 From: dougselsam Date: 6/6/2016
Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20205 From: dave santos Date: 6/6/2016
Subject: Welty Turbine maiden flight

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20206 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20207 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20208 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: European Training Network AWESCO Launched

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20209 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: European Training Network AWESCO Launched

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20210 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20211 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20212 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
Subject: Re: US9178241 High altitude platform

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20213 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20214 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20215 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Speed-wing paragliding stunt-flying

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20216 From: dougselsam Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20217 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20218 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: NASA's Fabric Space Module deployed

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20219 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
Subject: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20220 From: Rod Read Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20221 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20222 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20223 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20225 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20226 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20227 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20228 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20229 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20230 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: NASA's Fabric Space Module deployed

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20231 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
Subject: Re: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20181 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20182 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Re: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)
Reactions- 

The Makani video popped up in open comments on its Google+ page, where otherwise update is overdue. The turbines are shown motored-up, but no sign of actual hover (M600 hover capability will be marginal, at best).  Makani job postings have settled down, but its not clear if key positions get filled or go begging.

The KPS video is rich in prototyping detail. The Brits' line is not spooling as neatly as Dutch-German reelers. Even worse, a tether is seen jumping off its pulley sheave due to a fairlead geometry mismatch. Excessive line-wear is likely, just as early Italian reelers experienced. KiteLab-predicted inherent interference between close kites is not shown, nor how they intend to weathercock side-by-side wings. CEO Bill Hampton comes off as a genial character. Its hard to find continuity between what started as Allister' Fureys evolutionary robotics thesis work and KPS today, but KPS claims this AI prowess has "been key to automating the KPS flight control system". Does this mean an actual genetic-algorithm or neural-net autopilot basis?! The video shows manual flight dependence. Allister is now chasing an MBA, along a rather careening career path., but we hope it all works out for him.




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20183 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 5/27/2016
Subject: Re: Recent video peeks (KPS and Makani)
Attachments :
    On then off: see attached.

      @@attachment@@
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20184 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2016
    Subject: The current state of AWE R&D
    Its been a wild decade as AWE research has surged from a small handful of "kite energy" teams to several dozen. There has been progress in every area. Ten years ago, AWE was not even a term, there were no conferences, no online forums, no textbook, no high-profile investment reports, no major investors, no government support, and no Open-AWE movement; but now there is. Max power and endurance, funding, staffing, conceptual diversification, and many other technical metrics all tell the same rapid-growth story. 

    Inexperienced players found the going tougher and slower than expected. The poorest-prepared sank from poor conceptual selections and bad business decisions, but several new ventures sprang up for every failure. There has never been more more players than there is right now. A ongong influx of veterans from aerospace, aviation, marine-engineering, kite-sports, and related fields, are proving to be best prepared for the hard work and long early development cycle.

    Perhaps the greatest progress is in gathering the critical-mass of essential knowledge needed to advance further. The AWES Forum has been the best ongoing source of information. Our understanding of issues from kite physics to airspace integration has advanced greatly. The critical design factors of mass-to-power, safety, and scaling laws are far better defined. We are now transitioning from relative ignorance, where most any down-select was a premature gamble, to relative expertise, where one must down-select decisively and move fast.

    Open-AWE is a player on a par or even beyond top players like Makani or AWESCO, but with a very different values and dynamics. Starting around ten years ago we defined our mission in terms of societal urgency for new clean energy, which came to be defined by "RAD" (Rapid AWE Development). "Rapid" of course meant "as fast as practical", given the constraints. Open knowledge-sharing was our key value.

    Friction between the "stealth venture"* model and Open-AWE over knowledge-sharing was severe, but the ventures lost the battle for secrecy, since key facts leak so easily these days. Unable to gain cooperation with the stealth-ventures over comparative open testing, Open-AWE evolved toward a sort of virtual "Manhattan project without walls", where its increasingly possible to compare different architectures analytically, if not in direct fly-offs, which the ventures apparently dread.

    Overall, the current state of AWE R&D is vigorous. Billions of green-energy R&D dollars are in the global investment pipelines. Public awareness is exploding. The next decade only seems to promise ever more exciting developments. "Wubbo lives".

    ------------
    * As Makani and other ventures once described themselves.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20185 From: dave santos Date: 5/28/2016
    Subject: Texas AWE Encampment Update
    Ed will be uploading a video clip of the kPower Tumbling-Wing prototype previously reported. This update mainly covers pending experiments being assembled in Austin, and headed to the coast for good sea-breeze and the ease of a "readily programmable" sand-anchor field.

    ---------------

    A Welty Loop LadderMill prototype is coming together to work just like Doug's original loop, except that the kite-elements are ~50 soft drogue-buckets. Not considered a hot concept, but expected to be interesting. Five years KiteLab Ilwaco flew a sled-kite-based laddermill, which suffered from by looping elements. This time there are swivels every few buckets. The result sought is a decent ratio of downwind to upwind drag.

    A second attempt to fly a ~50kW rated rope-loop will space the return side lower, to prevent the twisting lock-up that occurred on the first try (twisting both sides of the loop, not just local twist, as in the previous note).

    The Tumbling-Wing prototype will be tested pumping a groundgen (there was only enough wind before to test unloaded).

    A new groundgen design based on a rack-and-pinion will also be tested, maybe with the tumbling-wing. Borsheim's groundgen will be present as a baseline device.

    A FlipWing rigging refinement is aimed at incrementally better performance. A Rocket-Man drogue will be rigged as a return pumping-line tensioner, along with a larger pilot-lifter, for more efficient power transmission to the groundgen.

    The radially symmetric SS prototype (based on Sedgwick's UFO kite) will be passively suspended from a pilot-lifter to prevent crashing. Its expected to "go nuts" harmlessly. If so, the next step is to connect PTO lines crosswind. This radial wing has been manually flown already, and showed the expected balance of simplicity and performance.

    A 5.5m2 valved Pansh parafoil will be "stakedout" by sand anchors from its bridle-points. This is a scale prototype for megascale powerkite cableway and aerotecture arch concepts without longline tethers. If wind is light, kPower's 32m NPW will be staked-out from its bridle, like a large tent without poles.

    A 7W FM radio transmitter will be tested with a mini-coax antenna lofted by a pilot-lifter. This is a side-effort to build operational experience in every possible niche. Follow-on experiments will integrate KiteSat power at high altitude.

    An SS powerkite will be rigged with one wingtip held up by a pilot, to assess gybing potential along a crosswind cableway.

    Many small tests will assess misc. details, like new kitebar features, SS powerkite quirks*, and so on. A full debriefing on the results of all these experiments will follow.

    -----------------
    * Noting from this morning's flying session that the SS power kite seems to favor two-line style CP-shift turning, compared to the balanced CP and brakeline steering input used for parafoils. Provisional Lesson- fly a four-line SS more like a two-line, except when backing-down to land, or other secondary flight modes, when all four lines are needed.




    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20186 From: gordon_sp Date: 5/31/2016
    Subject: Re: Texas AWE Encampment Update
    Hi Dave,
    Tell me more about the "~50kW rated rope-loop". Is it powered from the ground or the air?  What is the rope speed, pulley diameters, and the tensions in the drive and return cables?  Are there guards to prevent the rope from decoupling from the sheaves?  Can you measure the inefficiency?
    Gordon. 
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20187 From: dave santos Date: 5/31/2016
    Subject: Re: Texas AWE Encampment Update
    Hi Gordon,

    The  "~50kW rated rope-loop" is a low-cost commercial fishing (crabpot) rope spiced into a 300ft loop between two pulleys. In principle, it can drive from above or below for "motor-gen" "revere-pumping" modes. The rating is rough estimate based on rope-driving practice. There is a practical velocity within a reasonable working load of the rope (~3000lbs) to match 50kW, as a table in the reference linked below.*

    This experiment is a second dummy-run to work out operational methods. A next step is to drive it at high velocity from the ground, with some sort of spectacular aerial load, ideally, like sustaining flight in calm, somehow; and the final goal is optimized rope-driving as a standard AWES engineering option,

    daveS

    * A classic handbook within Low Complexity AWE R&D-








    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20188 From: dave santos Date: 5/31/2016
    Subject: Makani Wing7 at Bay Area Maker Faire
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20189 From: dave santos Date: 6/2/2016
    Subject: Wind data above the Jet Stream (16km+)
    Linked below is a study of stratospheric winds for the solar-LTA HALE concept, but informative for general HALE analysis. We have several exotic AWE-related HALE concepts under ongoing discussion, and this sort of data reference helps comparative evaluation. The critical parameters covered include mean wind velocities, and amplitude and frequency of turbulent disturbance by rough geographic distribution. We knew these winds to be generally rather light and steady, but still dynamically variable, with a zoo of complex events, like breaking gravity waves, mountain waves, strongly changing seasons, ITCZ stormtops, the polar-vortex, and so on. This is a simplified bulk and sampled-site statistical view-




    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20190 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/2/2016
    Subject: One kind of electric kite winder

    Inventors王本

    Comment: 
    1. Keep open to all scales. 
    2. Consider reversal for generation
    3. Flash idea: Mine the muscles of people by kite system:  Have 100 humans flying, say, a SLK with a, say, a hand-held winder with generator: As SLK works out to the sky have the out cord generate electricity; then when the human controls the wing set for return and winds back line with muscle, then mine the muscle energy.   Partly this converts food to electricity. 
    4. Consider the value of education for AWES via items such as is featured in this patent. 
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20191 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Companies dedicated to making kite systems for specific uses

    Companies dedicated to making 

    kite systems for specific uses

    ===============================

    Name of company: ________________________

    Website: ____________________________

    Description of the specific use for kite system: ______


    Commentary: __________________________________


    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20192 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Re: KIteWinder
    Kitewinder's CEO Olivier Normand has announced that the company is scaling up into larger and higher performance blades for AWE uses. 
     KiteWinder - Home

    The blades are carbon-fibre based; he is keeping the weight of the blades secret [my guess is that that secret won't last long]. 



     Quote     Kitewinder to produce own CF blades

     "Just coming out of the mould! Our second lightweight carbon fiber blade benefit from the experience we have gained this year. We can now produce carbon fiber blades up to 2 meters for the airborne wind turbine industry. We already commercialise those blades in France and United States. The weight of our blades is a secret... but you can ask us if you want to know more about our products!"   :



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20193 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage
    Michiel Kruijff 
    Head of Product Development at Ampyx Power Ampyx PowerPlanes

    Quoting:
     â€¢ 5.5 m breadboard demonstrators for fully autonomous power generation cycle (30 kW). 
     Our 10 m, 200 kW system is currently under development.

    Ampyx Power

     



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20194 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Olivier Van Oost

    Project Manager Airborne Wind Energy technologies

    ENGIE Lab Laborelec

    January 2014 – Present (2 years 6 months)


    Olivier Van Oost


    ======================
    Laborelec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

     


    =================================



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20195 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Moving powered ground anchor launching kited wing

    Paraglider towed by winch .


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20196 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: European Training Network AWESCO Launched
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20197 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/3/2016
    Subject: Wavy Arch

    Wavy Arch

    Have sectors of arch load line with lifters intersperse with some firm anti-lifters. 


    First easy:    M

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20198 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
    Subject: Powered anchor for kited wing Swift

    Powered anchor for kited wing Swift


    Swift Glider Aerobatics on Aerotow - Luxemburg Airshow 2010 [PART 1]


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20199 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
    Subject: US9178241 High altitude platform
    US9178241    High Altitude Platform
    Peter Davidson
    Hugh Edmund Murray Hunt
    Christopher John Burgoyne
    ... each from Great Britain

    Priority data: 
    1012864.3 30.07.2010 GB
    1015807.9 21.09.2010 GB
    1017685.7 20.10.2010 GB

    =========================================
    Comment:   This seems to be a system of sending fuel up a conduit in the tether; then at altitude the fuel is used to generate electricity.   

    =============
    In the patent there is considerable discussion about streamlined tethers and stabilized flight of the same. Specific tether design notes could interest many of us. 

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20200 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/4/2016
    Subject: Apparatus and method for transporting particles to the atmosphere

    Apparatus and method for transporting particles to the atmosphere

    Peter Davidson
    Hugh Edmund Murray Hunt
    Christopher John Burgoyne
    ... each from Great Britain

    ===================================
    Comment:  Intended kited wing is LTA. 


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20201 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/5/2016
    Subject: US4832571 Flexible tethered wind turbine

    US4832571 Dec 23, 1987May 23, 1989
     
    Flexible tethered wind turbine
    Frank L. Carroll

    ==============================
    Comments: 

    Hybrid. 
    Centrifugal force employed. 
    Torsion transfer to groundgen
    Consider enhancing system by kite lifting. 

    ==================




    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20202 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/6/2016
    Subject: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System

    Alexander Anatoliy Anderson

    Filed: June 25, 2013

    Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20203 From: dougselsam Date: 6/6/2016
    Subject: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20204 From: dougselsam Date: 6/6/2016
    Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System
    This looks like Altaeros on steroids.
    I'd guess this technology must read on Altaeros patents.
    I know it reads on mine.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20205 From: dave santos Date: 6/6/2016
    Subject: Welty Turbine maiden flight
    Ron Welty is a kite industry pro who proposed a soft version of the laddermill loop architecture a few years ago, and it was named the Welty Turbine here on the AWES Forum. kPower took stock Peter Lynn multi-bucket drogues rigged into a loop and flew them yesterday from a large experimental tensegrity pulley held up by a 9m2 pilot-kite, from Norman Elementary School, in East Austin, Texas.

    The loop did in fact self-circulate, but with the well-known line loop tendency to twist in turbulence without a secondary preventer pulley to space open the loop. The single prototype tensegrity pulley also had an issue with sliding guy-lines, but otherwise is a nice advance of its own (two compression rings and axial compression spar rigged in pure tension). Both of the rigging short-cut issues will resolve in follow-on sessions by the standard correctives. Intentional exploration of failure modes and corrections is claimed as due-diligence.

    This demo is most interesting for proving that drag-based AWE is possible in real-life (if not optimal), which some have rejected a-priori. Its also a rare case of a continuous load-motion AWECS. The pilot kite component does provide essential operational lift, but the easy total modularity of lift and pure drag WECS is instructive. The maiden-flight video was weak, but confirming of loop-motion. Better video of better performance will be shared as it happens. kPower neither endorses nor condemns this method; it was just on the long list of AWE concepts to test neutrally under the doctrines "All kite flying is good experience", and "Test everything, including the "bad" ideas".

    If this is a viable AWES architecture, its due to low-complexity and rock-bottom capital-cost.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20206 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    To provide AWE technical context, membrane sandwich sails have been common in sailboat racing for a couple of decades, with fundamental advances contributed by Paul Elvstrom Sails. North Sails is most notable in AWE via its New Zealand loft, which created SkySails ship-kites, but these are of conventional parafoil construction (light nylon or polyester rip-stop). KiteShip ship-kites are also conventionally sewn, excepting prototypes, which are seam-taped. There have long been fine stunt kites made of membrane laminates, but in AWE R&D Rod is noted for his arch kite made from windsurfer sails of membrane construction.

    Modern sail tech has been closely reviewed on the Forum in past years. The main advance useful to AWES experimenters is to lay fiber tapes along sail loadpaths, which kPower has practiced many times, particularly in Mothra kixel design. Gizmag is an uneven source of tech news, and this article amounts to a stale summary of North marketing, as a vehicle for Gizmag's advertisers. By posting North promotional coverage Doug seems to be softening his past opinion that sails are not a promising method in AWE. North's own website is far more informative, and Elvstrom's site also beats Gizmag's gloss on modern sails-





    On Monday, June 6, 2016 12:57 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20207 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System
    As stated many times before on the AWES Forum, the ready work-around to these sort of LTA AWES patents is Oberth's 60's scheme based on a conventional aerostat form with the WECS turbine suspended underneath. Oberth's public domain AWES concept maximizes LTA lift at at far lower parasitic drag, with lower gas loss by less surface and seams, and far simpler construction. Bolonkin's rope-driving variant is a significant variant. Large ducted blimps of the patented forms do not sufficiently (if at all) enhance wind turbine performance. COTS aerostats also win by lowest capital cost and greatest robustness to bad conditions. Very few AWE patents are golden art, and those few are expired. Open-AWE is running far ahead of patent-protected IP in every category of AWE.


    On Monday, June 6, 2016 12:59 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    This looks like Altaeros on steroids.
    I'd guess this technology must read on Altaeros patents.
    I know it reads on mine.


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20208 From: dave santos Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: European Training Network AWESCO Launched
    AWESCO is badly mistaken in concluding, " [EU granting] developments clearly show that the pioneering phase of Airborne Wind Energy is over" ! 

    The pioneering era in AWE can only really end decades from now, when AWES technology in mature GW-scale forms extends all the way to the stratosphere, with specialized variants operable from the ITCZ to the Polar Vortex. We have barely begun the pioneering era, as more-objectively defined by the resource itself and the fully unmet societal need to unlock it. AWESCO must still pioneer boldly, or fail.

    To pioneer effectively, AWESCO faces conflicting interests and values of its private venture partners versus impartial academic engineering science and the global stakeholder. Lets hope the new PhDs contribute deep advances in AWE knowledge, rather than remain marketing props for prematurely down-selected AWES architectures.

    AWESCO's biggest technical risk is that "reeling" AWE may just be an early baseline architecture. It would be a failure of due-diligence if AWESCO fails to identify any non-reeling AWES basis that becomes dominant. Payne, Hadzicki, and kPower are examples of leading players with pure crosswind high load-velocity concepts not based on long upwind return cycles. NTS's track loop can also be operated mostly crosswind (without necessity to orbit cars into the wind).

    The AWESCO inclusion of the traction kite is supported by the success of kite sports and ship-kites, and the technology is highly scalable. Even with a timid choice (lacking Wubbo's lead) to only study within its R&D social circle, AWESCO should be able to clearly resolve economic performance scaling questions between large kites like SkySails and hot kiteplanes like Ampyx.

    EU public research funding entails a moral duty to transparency, but most of the AWESCO players have long been secretive about key issues, like validation of AWES concept down-selection processes by private ventures. How did major players and their approaches (like NTS) get rejected from AWESCO? Why no Italian, French, etc., participation? What happened to the AWEC promotional vehicle and broken global AWE conference rotation, under dominant AWESCO insider control? 

    Hopefully Madame Curie Foundation and broad EU support comes with a duty of high transparency from AWESCO, and we won't have to wait unduly for the greater openness. A key signal will be how AWESCO collaborates with new partners outside the insider network, either by the open-academic ethos, or the commercial stealth-venture ethos.

    Its a very exciting time, and good luck to AWESCO in meeting the huge challenges brilliantly with its new PhDs.



    On Friday, June 3, 2016 8:26 PM, "joefaust333@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20209 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: European Training Network AWESCO Launched
    Not sure what "statement" the preceding post refers to, but to say "the pioneering phase is over" is equivalent to saying the pioneering phase of automotive development was over before the wheel came into common use, let alone pneumatic tires and paved roads.  If this were automotive development I'd say we're still "pre-bicycle", or maybe "pre-horse & carriage".   We're still walking.  Maybe crawling.  Certainly stumbling.  Floundering.  Without any AWE system in daily operation, who in their right mind would make such a claim?  Is it that they feel their mastery of group photos has reached a point where no further improvement is possible?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20210 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: Portable Self-inflating Airborne Wind Turbine System
    I agree with this analysis.
    It seems amazing that so many purport to explore AWE yet do not seem to grasp even the most basic fundamentals involved.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20211 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    Yes well excuse me for forwarding an article that seemed of interest to those on the forum interested in sails, but thanks for summarizing the real story, as well as my latest thinking.  Always good to make sure everything I say is properly filtered, even if it is just providing a link to an article.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20212 From: dougselsam Date: 6/7/2016
    Subject: Re: US9178241 High altitude platform
    Could be used to fight global cooling...
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20213 From: joe_f_90032 Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage

    Go figure: how a high-altitude drone could be the future of wind power


    =========================================
    Comment notes: 
    1. AP3     "...AP3, the biggest prototype yet. A wingspan of 12m produces around 250kW of energy"

    2. AP4     Estimating: 30-40 m      for 2 MW generation

    3. "A commercial offering could be available as soon as 2018, but there is a long way to go yet."  (bold added)

    4. AP or Ampyx PowerpPlane is a kite having ground generator driven by wing's pulling out tether; energy and time is costed to shorten the tether in preparation for another cycle of having the wing pull the tether again for generation. Their first development realm has not had any propellers or impellers on their kited wing. 

    5. The choice of graphic by the above news point that  have propellers or impellers seems CONFUSING uncorrected.   Ampyx, are you approving of the use of that graphic?   Are you considering branching your interest to flygen, FFAWE, powering the wing for either flygen or special powered launch and landing? Your clarification on this graphic and your direction would be interesting. Thanks. 

    =============================

    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20214 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    Doug,

    The reasons North Sails is a key AWE player go far deeper than Gizmag and membrane sandwich tech per-se.

    KiteShip folks have lifelong sailmaking roots with North Sails, including inheriting North's loft near Makani, when North moved to new quarters. My teenage years involved annual icollaboration with North Sails of Annapolis, to prepare boats of all kinds for the racing season. And its only natural that North New Zealand is behind SkySails wing, with Peter Lynn also in play in NZ parafoil advances. Paying due homage to Elvstrom (and Jalbert) is part of this tiny sub-culture, which also founded the AWES Forum.

    Thus expert sailmaking discussion has simply been the norm on the Forum, and Gizmag pop-treatment does not fully meet the mark here. The classic technical work on sail performance is Marchaj's book referenced below. I was fortunate to read Dave Culp's copy at KiteShip, The actual news in AWES sails is not membranes and tapes, but the ongoing emergence of giant SS power-kites. Expect North to continue to be in the R&D mix, and Gizmag to lag in noting the story.

    You are remembered for years of discounting sails. Linking Gizmag on the subject, but without your old doubts and condemnations, does suggest your opinion of soft AWE wings is improving,

    daveS

    --------------------------------------
    The Aero-hydrodynamics of Sailing by C.A. Marchaj
    For those who love the challenge of calculus and appreciate a deeper technical understanding of the forces at work on a sailboats hull, sails and appendages, Marchajs 700-page Aero-hydrodynamics of Sailing is a heavily illustrated and authoritative reference essential. (1988 Dodd, Mead & Company, 741pp, $124.50)


    On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 2:25 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    Yes well excuse me for forwarding an article that seemed of interest to those on the forum interested in sails, but thanks for summarizing the real story, as well as my latest thinking.  Always good to make sure everything I say is properly filtered, even if it is just providing a link to an article.


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20215 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Speed-wing paragliding stunt-flying
    A hybrid niche sport between soaring paragliders and wingsuit flying using small high-speed parafoils that open as parachutes (its hard to foot-launch a high-speed-wing)-



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20216 From: dougselsam Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    I think you are confused about my statements, thus misrepresenting my expressed opinions, past & present:
    3) I've maintained that cloth sails as working surfaces were superseded over 100 years ago, with single-skin working surfaces obsolete around 1000 years ago.
    2) I never said cloth sails have no use or possible promise in AWE.  I've always been a big fan of kites and have a couple that I fly every so often, although my windfarm-class wind resource is too much for most kites - they get ripped apart pretty quickly.  Luckily we have ductape...
    1) This article did mention single-skin sails.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20217 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    I could not find where the Gizmag article mentioned kites or AWE.

    This is a fairly typical old Forum quote of Doug regarding cloth kites (2011). He does seem to be reversing his past pessimism in this topic thread-

    "To even use a kite is to not be acknowledging one of the main things learned over the years in wind energy: systems that last must be incredibly strong, nothing made of cloth has ever stood the test of time in wind energy. Believe me if the industry could get by on mere cloth blades they'd be doing it."


    On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:15 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    I think you are confused about my statements, thus misrepresenting my expressed opinions, past & present:
    3) I've maintained that cloth sails as working surfaces were superseded over 100 years ago, with single-skin working surfaces obsolete around 1000 years ago.
    2) I never said cloth sails have no use or possible promise in AWE.  I've always been a big fan of kites and have a couple that I fly every so often, although my windfarm-class wind resource is too much for most kites - they get ripped apart pretty quickly.  Luckily we have ductape...
    1) This article did mention single-skin sails.


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20218 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: NASA's Fabric Space Module deployed
    Low orbit fabric spaceship practical challenges are not too different from theoretic kite-based high-altitude aerotectural requirements. Both regimes require safely holding ambient pressure for a decent lifespan at lowest mass-



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20219 From: dave santos Date: 6/8/2016
    Subject: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric
    Since we are taking up fabric questions again, in a long multi-year cycle, lets look at Aircraft Spruce's current cloth offerings.There is evident overlap of airplane fabric with sailcoth supply, similar to the sailcoth-kitecloth overlap. Prices are moderate for good quality. Not much new...

    For the last century, with a suitable UV barrier, fabric aircraft are often parked outdoors and remain airworthy many years. As noted on the old Forum, the fabric covered Hawker Hurricane empennage endured 400+ mph (of artificial wind). Today's fabrics are far stronger yet, for unprecedented performance.

    Aircraft Spruce is the classic materials supplier to the EAA home-built aircraft movement-



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20220 From: Rod Read Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials
    Is this how the AWES service engineer of the future will arrive at work?

    Need a quality lightweight framework printed to the exact engineering spec of your AWES frame?

    It's ok to dream about AWES with some magazine time inspiration surely.

    I don't have time to research airboards ... unless my son (11 yrs) is on about his great idea again... The magazine format helped.

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878



    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20221 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials
    Rod,

    Gizmag is a legitimate source of popular buzz here, but simply is not an expert-level source of AWES wing art. The AWES Forum duty is to go deep as well, for example by proposing Marchaj as the classic engineering treatment of sailing performance.

    We already scrutinized Gizmag as a media company focused on attracting advertisers whose target demographic is higher-income middle-aged males (from their own marketing). We have consistently followed Gizmag when it related to AWE, but I still don't see the direct AWE connection Doug sees in Gizmag's stale North Sails "news".

    Disagreement over the quality of sources is natural, since not all sources are really equal, but some are superb :)

    daveS


    On Thursday, June 9, 2016 8:48 AM, "Rod Read rod.read@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    Is this how the AWES service engineer of the future will arrive at work?

    Need a quality lightweight framework printed to the exact engineering spec of your AWES frame?

    It's ok to dream about AWES with some magazine time inspiration surely.

    I don't have time to research airboards ... unless my son (11 yrs) is on about his great idea again... The magazine format helped.

    Rod Read

    Windswept and Interesting Limited
    15a Aiginis
    Isle of Lewis
    UK
    HS2 0PB

    07899057227
    01851 870878





    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20222 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Ampyx Press Coverage
    Joe, the propellers are for launching, landing, and general maneuvering.

    The main questions would seem:

    1)  How many more years can the kite-reeling efforts go on without having a product, and still remain credible?
    (If we accept kite-reeling as a religion, we might expect to wait at least 2000 years with no loss of credibility.  I mean, people are still impressed with that group picture of 12 smiling disciples...

    2) Will kite-reeling actually turn out to be an economically-viable method of harvesting wind energy?
    (Let's remember, regular wind energy has been continually getting cheaper, and solar even more so.)

    If they can't generate power economically, maybe they could just sell that electric airplane as a product.  I would like one!
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20223 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    Wow thanks for digging up an old post.
    This is an old topic on this forum.
    Last I remember, you were citing an obscure GE supposed effort to develop blades comprising a frame with cloth stretched over it, like some light planes, and somewhat similar to the old Dutch design used for hundreds of years.  Of course they got millions in free money for this well-publicized "project".
    While this is a far cry from using kites as working surfaces, it is yet the evidence you've offered to bolster your position that cloth working surfaces represent an economically-effective wind energy solution.  So, since you have used this project to support your position, maybe you could update us on the progress of that project.  Don't get me wrong - sounds worth pursuing to me, and as I mentioned I advocated additional patented features to their international director of research, at a national conference.  My perception was that he, personally, didn't take the whole idea of the cloth-covered blades very seriously.   Funny how these "projects" are announced with great fanfare, get covered by all the magazines and websites, millions are allocated, then they "quietly go away"...  Sound familiar?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20225 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric
    Thank God for Aircraft Spruce.  Not only are they local (here in Southern California) but they ship same day, and do not mind small orders for metal tubing.  Like Selsam Innovations and Fender Guitars, they were located in Fullerton.  Now we've all moved inland - Fender and Aircraft Spruce are now in Corona, while we went further, to the Cajon Pass, known for its incredible wind resource.  I buy from them all the time and usually end up stopping in whenever I'm driving by on the 91 freeway.  Last purchase was aircraft-grade bolts for a hang glider.  And of course they have cloth for airplanes - with a SuperCub-type STOL plane hanging from the ceiling as an example.  So, can you tell us about a grid-connected wind energy project using cloth sails?
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20226 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials
    That thing is insane!  Pretty scary though, if power goes down or anything goes wrong at less than 250 feet.  I'd recommend a ballistic parachute.  Don't worry, nothing wrong with Gizmag - that was just another typical weak attempt to invalidate me.  :)
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20227 From: dougselsam Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials
    Thanks for spelling my name right daveS.  From my perspective, your thrust is to lob grenades at me then run away.  There doesn't seem to be any limit to the lengths you'll go to try and denigrate me.  If I try to post, no matter the topic, you feel obligated to restate, filter, or otherwise "correct" anything I say.

    Citing a boring, fairly neutral article about sails, which you normally promote, could be viewed, in hindsight, as a test to see how many ways you would try to turn it into an argument.  Looks like you've tried to start several over it, even to the point of trying to invalidate Gizmag as a valid information source.  Whatever it takes, right? 

    You claim to be "an expert".  You apparently consider yourself a master-debater.  My take that you like to run out and lob a grenade, then run away means you like to start debates, but are unable to finish them.  Do you want to be taken seriously or not?  Can you finish what you started?

    Let's stick to the latest topic: cloth blades for wind turbines.  You had put forth GE developing cloth-covered blades as evidence that I was wrong about cloth blades not being used in wind energy.  So, please follow up now.   A few years have gone by, so you now you have the luxury to complete your argument.  Please tell us how the GE project went, and what is the next step.  They got 3 million from Arpa-E for this.  That is certainly enough to build a set and run them.  So, can we please see the photos or videos of the alleged cloth-covered blades in operation, and some data regarding performance?
    Thanks
    :)
    DougS
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20228 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: North Sails Improved Sailmaking Tech on Gizmag
    Doug,

    You are welcome for the reminder. Your old posts do present a more accurate picture of what you have publicly declared regarding cloth and kites than your memory alone does.

    Not being a direct party to the GE research, I don't know about their latest fabric blade experimentation, but we do know fabric works in aviation practice, if not conventional wind. When results are announced, we'll share them with you. You are a direct party in GE negotiations you have mentioned, involving your ideas, which you could tell us about firsthand,

    daveS




    On Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:50 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    Wow thanks for digging up an old post.
    This is an old topic on this forum.
    Last I remember, you were citing an obscure GE supposed effort to develop blades comprising a frame with cloth stretched over it, like some light planes, and somewhat similar to the old Dutch design used for hundreds of years.  Of course they got millions in free money for this well-publicized "project".
    While this is a far cry from using kites as working surfaces, it is yet the evidence you've offered to bolster your position that cloth working surfaces represent an economically-effective wind energy solution.  So, since you have used this project to support your position, maybe you could update us on the progress of that project.  Don't get me wrong - sounds worth pursuing to me, and as I mentioned I advocated additional patented features to their international director of research, at a national conference.  My perception was that he, personally, didn't take the whole idea of the cloth-covered blades very seriously.   Funny how these "projects" are announced with great fanfare, get covered by all the magazines and websites, millions are allocated, then they "quietly go away"...  Sound familiar?


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20229 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Gizmag link quality : airboard and materials
    Doug,

    Please start a GE fabric blade topic if you want on-topic discussion. If I had fresh info on GE, I would share it with you. Try asking Gizmag to look into GE's fabric study, to offset my lack of news,

    That you have been pessimistic about fabric-based kite and sail tech is settled by your own words on the Forum. If you posted the Gizmag link without having changed your mind about fabric sails, then excuse the natural confusion. Fabric is a proven "working surface" in many striking aerospace apps, and at least GE is rightfully aware of the ongoing need to explore the potential. North Sails is a serious player in AWE, based on the potential of fabric wings.

    You can also ask Gizmag to look into GE's fabric study, to offset my lack of news, if Gizmag is more than an advertising medium for its target demographic. Otherwise, just be patient,and we'll cover GE's results as they emerge. Sorry if you think my posting shows you in a poor light. May your merits shine so bright no one can dim them,

    daveS


    On Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:50 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    That thing is insane!  Pretty scary though, if power goes down or anything goes wrong at less than 250 feet.  I'd recommend a ballistic parachute.  Don't worry, nothing wrong with Gizmag - that was just another typical weak attempt to invalidate me.  :)


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20230 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: NASA's Fabric Space Module deployed
    The latest NASA fabric space module feat is fresh news, unlike the fact North makes membrane sails (for decades now). Both stories do relate to AWE as similarity cases, as Chris Carlin, our top wind-tech aerospace engineering mentor, advised us collect. We thus see NASA's fabric space module tech as a close engineering similarity-case to fabric aerotecture pressure cabins. We have in fact covered North sail tech in-depth before, as expert insiders, citing the company's superb tutorials. Invoking Marchaj now takes the fabric wing subject to its highest engineering science sources, way beyond the Gizmag standard.

    NASA's heritage of diverse advanced fabric applications does pose a stark contrast to Doug's long-expressed low opinion of fabric-based AWE potential. After all, the modern parafoil and NPW emerged from NASA research to represent essential baseline AWES tech. Most of NASA's greatest feats require fabric components, from decellerators to space-suits. Doug should not unduly construe all these NASA fabric tech similarity cases as personal annoyances, but try to understand the high positive value these cases offer to those serious about including advanced fabric tech in their AWES design toolbox.




    On Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:50 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    See? Doug is bad.  He brings facts from wind energy that we don't want to hear.  So let's bring up something off-topic that peripherally, at least "sort of" refers to a subject Doug mentioned (cloth?) and includes NASA, to create the illusion that we've just proven Doug wrong, which is, of course, our main goal...

    Well when there's no news in AWE, I guess we have to talk about something, right?  The old "inflated spacecraft" idea...  Now we're doing wind energy in outer space?  Stuff I used to joke about, wind turbines on the moon, underground wind turbines, but in this venue there is no such thing as "ridiculous".


    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 20231 From: dave santos Date: 6/9/2016
    Subject: Re: Quick review of aviation-rated fabric
    Doug asked: "...can you tell us about a grid-connected wind energy project using cloth sails?"


    Yes. As reported on the AWES Forum, kPower briefly connected a grid-tie inverter at kFarm in 2014 to a battery energized by small cloth-sail AWES. While only a few Watt-hours, at most, uploaded during the demo session, this is how big advances start, from pioneering baby steps. Expect more cases to emerge, since any AWE developer these days can buy a grid-tie inverter and easily replicate the feat. It also seems possible GE's fabric blade experimental unit has been grid-tied, lacking definite news.


    On Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:50 PM, "dougselsam@gmail.com [AirborneWindEnergy]" <AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com  
    Thank God for Aircraft Spruce.  Not only are they local (here in Southern California) but they ship same day, and do not mind small orders for metal tubing.  Like Selsam Innovations and Fender Guitars, they were located in Fullerton.  Now we've all moved inland - Fender and Aircraft Spruce are now in Corona, while we went further, to the Cajon Pass, known for its incredible wind resource.  I buy from them all the time and usually end up stopping in whenever I'm driving by on the 91 freeway.  Last purchase was aircraft-grade bolts for a hang glider.  And of course they have cloth for airplanes - with a SuperCub-type STOL plane hanging from the ceiling as an example.  So, can you tell us about a grid-connected wind energy project using cloth sails?