Messages in AirborneWindEnergy group.  #111 to 166
Page 3 of 552.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 111 From: brooksdesign Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 112 From: dave santos Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 113 From: x x Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 114 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: LoopTether or FanBelt

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 115 From: allisterfurey Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 116 From: dave santos Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 122 From: harry valentine Date: 5/5/2009
Subject: Keeping it Simple

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 123 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/9/2009
Subject: Sea Solutions

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 124 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/10/2009
Subject: HAE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 125 From: dave santos Date: 5/11/2009
Subject: Kite Electricity: From Chaos to 60Hz

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 126 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/13/2009
Subject: Kite Secrets- String Tripods

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 127 From: allisterfurey Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 128 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 129 From: harry valentine Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 130 From: christopher carlin Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 131 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/15/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 132 From: dave santos Date: 5/17/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 133 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 134 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 135 From: dave santos Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 136 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/19/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 137 From: harry valentine Date: 5/19/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 138 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2009
Subject: Welcome new member Darin Selby

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 139 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/21/2009
Subject: Re: Welcome new member Darin Selby

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 140 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 141 From: Dan Fink Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 142 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 143 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 144 From: dave santos Date: 5/23/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 145 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/23/2009
Subject: TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 146 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 147 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 148 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Novel "Half Delta" Prototype Video

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 149 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: A wind-up motor with the TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 150 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: A wind-up motor with the TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 151 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2009
Subject: Kite Driven String Tripod & "Perpetual" Towing

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 152 From: Dan Fink Date: 5/27/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 153 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/4/2009
Subject: AWE with Tensairity from Empa

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 154 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/4/2009
Subject: Switch Grass Biomass & Kite Hybrid Generation

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 156 From: dave santos Date: 6/5/2009
Subject: Former Makani Engineer Seeking Employment

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 157 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/9/2009
Subject: AWE Classified Ads AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 158 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/13/2009
Subject: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 159 From: christopher carlin Date: 6/13/2009
Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 160 From: harry valentine Date: 6/13/2009
Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 161 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/14/2009
Subject: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 162 From: harry valentine Date: 6/14/2009
Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 163 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/14/2009
Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 164 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/15/2009
Subject: AWE Patent/IP Pool

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 165 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/23/2009
Subject: Latest Best Practice AWE

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 166 From: dave santos Date: 6/26/2009
Subject: Tripod Tether COTS AWE Demo




Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 111 From: brooksdesign Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill

hey xx,

 i have been experimenting with a new type of pnumatic device for light weight but powerfull actuation of all kinds of surfaces but I have also been wanting to expirement with vision systems as a way to provide the feed back to all kinds of robotic movement. What type of software are you using and how well could it interface with a 3D CAD program?

-brooks


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 112 From: dave santos Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)
notes-
 
Videogrammetry is machine vision designed to measure geometric relationships & will be an useful technique for monitoring kite arrays. Such a system might derive 3D wind spectrum data for trim inputs (non-realtime Chaotic Control).
 
By itself machine vision has serious limitations for realtime kite control where multi-sensing is essential & can include such disparate inputs as tether-force/length feedback, GPS, & inertial (spin) references.
 
Structuring the visual kite environment is important & should compliment navigation safety markings. A Kite Vision System must be able to determine kite orientation. A bold T shape may be best for "monochrome" structure, Red (port) & green (starboard) will work for color systems. By kitesailing (kayak kite) convention downwind direction is "forward",not the kite's nose direction, so kite's port is marked starboard. Reflective patches work well at night, possible better than daylight conditions where glare & cloud patterns compete with structured visuals. By day black is generally the most visible kite color from the ground, but is not a nav-safety color.
 
CAD/RealTime Control integration is a loose requirement, the main interface between developers is merely a common 3D file format. A Control Model is merely a skeletized idealization that ignores almost all CAD Model complexity [see Furey 07].
 
Minimal kite Servo Control is one servo per DOF (degree-of-freedom) although two servos are common for a two line (1 DOF) kite & three servos nicely control a power kite, including AoA. Quad-line servo kites generally use four, but two suffice by mixing left & right outputs. Such doubled servos might provide redundancy if a given servo "freezes".
 
 
 
Question to XX- What machine vision software environment are you using?
 
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 113 From: x x Date: 5/1/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)
I used the term 'investigate' in computer vision as I merely touched the topic testing open computer vision from Intel: opencv
What leads me to computer vision is the idea that it can mimic human control as in basic kite surf or paraglide .
As laws are very strict on the matter of eolic generators in Italy I haven't dig too deep into multisensing, even though it sounds like a critical factor .
As per CAD/CAM integration I have no idea but  I have been coding into real time applications .
I guess that is needed for talking to servos but other applications exists for cnc control:
arduino
http://www.linuxcnc.org

So opencv + linuxcnc would be a generic start for a personal search into kite machine control topic .



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 114 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: LoopTether or FanBelt
LoopTether or FanBelt
...method discussion starter:

"LoopTether" or single loop tether through one ground generator or "FanBelt" where aloft actions cause the tetering loop to drive the ground-based generator could be the focus of this thread. Small, sport, and grip-sizes are open for discussion. Challenges? Variants? Complexes?
One side of the tether is in tension; both sides of the tether are in motion, as the tether is a loop. Demonstrators? Any history? Distinctions? Potential?
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 115 From: allisterfurey Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)
Vision will be an important tool for active kite control. Using relatively simple blob tracking algorithms and a conical or parabolic mirror you can track kite position in real time. As Dave rightly says, colour or contrast cues or both can be used to make the code easier or more robust or extend position tracking to orientation tracking. If you want some basic matlab examples that I knocked up, you are welcome to them. Also I can point you to code for unwrapping conical mirrors. Also spot on from Dave is that you will need your blob tracking heuristics to change in different lighting conditions.

There are plenty of tutorials for blob tracking online.
In a commercial system, vision should be supplemented with line angle measurement, which can be done in a low-tech way pretty easily and on-board motion sensing. A weighted average of the position and orientation estimates can then be fed into your control algorithm. Vision or other of these estimates by themselves are NOT going to control the kite.

If you want to do some snazzy concurrent modelling with a CAM package (see Jeroen Breukels youtube page and publications for some nice stuff on MSC Adams) then these estimates will need to be pretty good. This is not neccesary for Neural Network control but other techniques/ Kalman filtering require a model running concurrently to the control in real world (i think!). A more detailed physics model and/or more advanced training techniques than we published in 07 is needed to train a neural network for decent real world control. I will post the pre-print of our next paper detailing this here as soon as our next paper is accepted.

As for servos dave covered it. If you fly some 2 and 4 line kites it should be pretty obvious what is neccesary for active control. Redundancy or a kitesurf style release is always going to be a plus for safety, as servos do die.

Al

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 116 From: dave santos Date: 5/4/2009
Subject: Re: diy laddermill (machine vision)
Visible wavelengths are fine for pioneering AWE, but radar is the ultimate way get immunity from sun glare & fog (experimenters must avoid flying in clouds or at night unless all safety issues are addressed). FAA requirement for visual tether markers every fifty feet gives AWE machine vision a ~free way to beat line position uncertainty. 
 
OpenCV is an good choice for vision dev.. National Instruments' LabView is a broad rich control application prototyping environment that can call OpenCV functions. Mass production, of course, would use standard cheap embedded microcontrollers (MCUs).
 
Arduino is a rather limited MCU environment, but has a nice (dorkbot) community. John Borsheim uses PICs, a popular minimalist MCU. Our AWE circle has a special invitation to use Silicon Labs' products, which are especially ideal for low powered use aloft. 8051 MCU EVB kits are available. Both companies are Austin based & have a long record of supporting cool "educational" projects.
 
Brooks Coleman will be especially interested in LinuxCNC, which seems like a fine choice. Wayne German is our 80XX guru; he was a top Intel troubleshooter & has been following Silicon Labs' offerings.
 
Machine vision may find its best initial AWE application doing inspection on high-speed production lines of tethered foils like flipwings.
 
ds
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 122 From: harry valentine Date: 5/5/2009
Subject: Keeping it Simple
Gentlemen,
 
 
I would suggest that efforts be made to keep airborne wind energy conversion as simple and straightforward as possible. Excess complexity could otherwise discourage acceptance of the technology. There is great merit to using ground-based electrical generation gear . . . it allows for use of more rugged technology that is easier to access and maintain. Lightweight and compact airborne generation equipment runs the risk of inducing thermal stresses which could lead to premature failure of electrical generation equipment.
 
Harry


Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 123 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/9/2009
Subject: Sea Solutions
The Path to Low Cost Abundant Energy
March 15, 2006 (revised 3/8/2007) Gary P. Hoffman

http://www.usenergyindependence.com/files/ThePath.pdf

[Ed: Hoffman does not seem to envision the kite-based systems at sea. We can look into the paper by Exquadrum, Inc, Drachen Foundation, and Dave Lang & Associates for a rich kite-based sea solution for a HAE or Hydrogen-Assisted Economy. We will soon be seeing the 2009 NIST/TIP paper
CRITICAL NATIONAL NEED IDEA
"JUMP-STARTING A HYDROGEN ASSISTED ECONOMY WITH A
CHEAP, RENEWABLE HYDROGEN SOURCE" where the kite-based sea solution space is outlined.]
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 124 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/10/2009
Subject: HAE
Jump-Starting
A Hydrogen Assisted Economy
With A Cheap,
Renewable Hydrogen Source

http://energykitesystems.net/hydrogen/WP2009ExquadrumLangDrachen.pdf

by Exquadrum, Inc.,
contributing org Drachen Foundation, and David Lang & Associates.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 125 From: dave santos Date: 5/11/2009
Subject: Kite Electricity: From Chaos to 60Hz
Kite Electricity: From Chaos to 60Hz
 
Ordinary wind is actual momentum decay direct from the Big Bang. Its not easy, but wind can be harvested in chaotic bursts by kites & converted to synchronous 60Hz electricity matched to fluctuating loads on regional grids.
 
A kite is a glorified rag on a string- a tethered foil. It is already a massively parallel nano-electrical system, bound together by opposed charges & operating in gaseous flows of repellent charges. A kite has the profound power of lower dimensions acting in our higher dimensional space. Quasi single-dimensional string & two-dimensional cloth has astounding properties in our four-dimensional space-time. A membrane of negligible thickness & mass is able to dam large pressure fields & process powerful flows. Mere sewing thread traveling at 200 mph can carry about a horsepower, a tangible relativistic effect in real life. Thread traveling at a thermal limit of about mach 1.5  could carry several horsepower to an electrical generator.
 
A high performance tethered foil has a vast output range. Often the foil loiters weakly, thensuddenly "ignites" in a gust by surging across its window. Greater than 20 to 1 power variation from cut-in to cut-out is usual. A farm of arrayed kites averages these wild random inputs, smoothing aggregated output. Networked electrical generators also level outputs, even driving laggards.
 
If too many or not enough wings fire or don't fire at once, things fry. A kite farm of properly designed (coupled) oscillators can self-synchronize in poly-phase to a master beat, as a phased array.  It helps if every link of the energy harvesting chain wants to oscillate at some factor of 60 (1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30) so that harmonic frequency hopping is natural (but watch out for massive rogue synchrony!). Kite arrays can fire in traveling waves where the wings move much like centipede legs; a beautiful spectacle.
 
Recent KiteLab experiments show these ideas are workable. A current design has six FlipWing membrane wing-mills in various synchronous modes driving a single generator shaft via sprags (freewheel clutches) with reasonable smoothness, for the generator & other rotating parts have a lot of flywheel mass. As desired, added flywheel mass further smooths output. The latest AWE (Airborne Wind Energy) Base Unit, with an improved crosswind geometry recently suggested by Joe Faust, consists of two orthogonal pendulum/freewheels whose wild dance is dampened by a cable driving an electic generator. Its a classical chaotic double pendulum, run mostly backwards, chaos into order, how cool is that? But such a beating heart needs a bit of control.
 
Chaotic Control began decades ago by sending under-actuated interplanetary space probes to unstable orbital locations where the right tiny nudge then set the craft on a desired trajectory, an engineered Butterfly Effect. There are many places to introduce small antichaotic trim inputs into an AWE energy chain. Generally every other power link or so can add a bit of passive or active tuning toward a final clean power signature. There need not be complex centralized control, just the regional grid's master synch AC signal and each phased array unit provided with a global state & phase assignment. 
 
Wind aloft is tunable by finding an altitude where the wings fire at a desired synch factor (while avoiding turbulent boundaries). Membrane wing-mills are frequency tunable by varying tension (catenary) on the halyard &/or sheet winch; tighter means faster. Nevermind that some wings fire out of phase due to turbulence & phase/frequency transitions. Just as a few ruffled feathers hardly affect a bird, misfiring elements are negligible if enough of an array is behaving.
 
The latest generation of generator/motor use smart controllers to adapt to a wide range of conditions, eliminating most gearing or ponied units. DC & asynchronous AC is practical for unsynched generation if standard rectifier/inverter stages are inserted in the loop. Old fashioned circuit breakers/relays can provide gross control of kite farm output. Net-metering, the selling back of extra power to a grid by small consumer-producers, has matured. The new smart super-grids will be rich in distributed generation points like kie farms.
 
The almost unavoidable sudden crashes (even cascaded crashes) of extreme-scale aerobatic airborne generators, as proposed by Makani Power & Sky WindPower, will tend to crash grids. Advanced flywheel generators, developed as hospital & data-center UPS, can catch a crashing grid, but they are overpriced for utility baseload scales. Bulk ultra-capacitors are still unavailable & will be pricey. The fail-soft qualities of large arrays of cheap simple semi-captive passively-controlled AWE elements are favored for a long time to come.
 
Its also important that the inflow wind field to an AWE array be predicted in realtime to assist power conditioning & reliability. As Wayne German envisioned, a cheap veil of sensor kites upwind might serve until SODAR is cheap & perfected. A key is to be able to reconstruct a high dimensional field from low dimensional sensor traces.
  
Surplus generation must divert to bonus-loads or storage. Stored power bridges calm winds & helps meet peak grid demands. Kite driven pumping around a hydroelectric dam is a promising technique. Hydrogen electrolysis loops, large & small, can feed back capacity KiteLab has introduced crude HHO production into its AWE loops (a limitation to cheap bulk electrolysis is that vapor bubbles increasingly isolate the electrodes as currents increase). Dave Lang's recent white paper to NIST (via Drachen) describes an H2 Assisted Economy with a strong role for kite derived H2. WindLift has been tracking bulk air compression for short term power storage during wind lulls.
 
To conclude: Kite Electricity has unique advantages in a diversified energy grid. With the lowest capital cost & capital cost intensity, the fastest set-up, etc., kites will fill many gaps in energy production. Disaster relief might be kite powered. Co-generation hybrids will be attractive- like coal-to-kite transitions & tar-sand kite processing, as well as superior HHO & H2 schemes. Hurray for rags on strings!
 
========================================
 
Thanks to John Borsheim for a refresher course in AC generation & net-metering, to Christopher Carlin for pointing out key issues in grid-synchronous alternative energy, & to Vijay Davar of KLD Energy Technologies & Steve Edley of Active Power for sharing new elactricl power generation concepts.
 
Dave Santos
KiteLab
Ilwaco, WA
Austin, TX
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 126 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/13/2009
Subject: Kite Secrets- String Tripods
[A quick note to put some key ideas in the public domain under KiteLab's evolving Free IP "Honor License"]
 
String Tripods
 
A tri-anchored String Tripod held up by a lifter kite is an essential kite wizard tool. String tripods lift & move objects independently of the lifter's compliance with the wind field. The tripod apex is easily moved in three dimensions by pulling or loosening the feet.
 
Massive loads can be lifted & transported over large obstacles with a kite lifted string tripod (or bipod). Tripod feet can be "walked" across the landscape, over wires, trees, & water. Kites can be walked to a workplace. When wind is lacking, kites & loads can be towed aloft & walked from tow point to tow point in sustained flight.
 
No other technology has such cheap, clean, & powerful lift potential. Pulleys at the feet can direct lines to a single point for control. Properly designed string tripod systems don't foul & relaunch reliably.
 
A string tripod is a useful station-keeper. Kite anemometry is a simple but powerful wind sampling technique. A string tripod holds sensors steady for better data. A kite lofted antenna can be held vertically by a string tripod, to even out & maximise its radiation pattern.
 
KiteLab has tested & confirmed the string tripod's ability to do precise lifting & placing. A kid operated string tripod (fixed kite mainline, variable tagline & tripline) loaded bagged beach litter into a construction dumpster during a 2008 beach clean-up in Long Beach, WA. Dummy payloads have been held steady aloft for hours at a time. 
 
KiteLab has demonstrated that an AWE membrane wingmill can be kept poised directly over a workcell by a variable string tripod. A small swivel at the apex enables rotation in veering wind without an expensive turret.
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 127 From: allisterfurey Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: makani- turbines on kites?
Don't recall seeing anyone link this yet:

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/05/04/saul.griffith/index.html

Saul following up from that picture in the TED talk with this:

""Saul Griffith: I work with a wonderful set of engineers at Makani Power. We are pursuing generating wind power with kites. There is more wind, more frequently, the higher you get off the ground. Normal wind turbines can only go so high. We are prototyping and testing kites that fly higher than existing turbines and produce a steady and low cost stream of electricity.

The kites fly autonomously through the sky like the unmanned aerial vehicles people hear about. Turbines -- like propellers on the kite -- spin, as the kite pushes them through the air. We generate electricity with high-efficiency motors attached to those turbines, and we bring the power down to the ground on a high-strength cable. When the wind doesn't blow we can put a little energy back into the system to keep it flying, but we make much, much more while there is a breeze. ""

Very interesting, assuming this is an accurate reflection of the way they are going, presumably this is motivated by solid operational/financial reasons. I can think of a few:
-Power smoothing less of an issue than with a reel/lever/rail system. :the word steady stood out for me!
-Less issues with tether wear when cycling a reel system.
-Launch in light wind by using impellors as propellors - vertical launch

Clearly all of these issue can be got round in other ways, I would like to see the reasoning/analysis whereby putting the generator on the kite is the best solution. But that's not going to happen so we'll have to make our own minds up!

I'm going to withhold judgement but can think of some reasons why i'm not totally convinced. Be interested to see other people's take on this...
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 128 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
Thanks Allister,

That is the first I had heard of makani "running the turbine backwards" to provide propulsion during wind lulls. While the idea of flying turbine h/w is a bit scary to some, if this works, it would be a charming solution to their no-wind issue (similar to that which might be potentially available for the Italian KiteGEN scheme, but likely less fraught with complications).

While using airborne turbines may extract an efficiency toll (drag induced by lift), "absolute efficiency" is not a particularly compelling parameter when the "raw energy source" is free!  All that counts is that the net efficiency maps into an economically attractive outcome in terms of "return on investment" (assuming that the game here is to "take on the fossil-fuel folks").

Dave L



At 4:35 PM +0000 5/14/09, allisterfurey wrote:
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 129 From: harry valentine Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
Thanks for posting this Allister & Dave;
 
 
Perhaps Makani could borrow some research from MAGENN . . . . and use a helium balloon to keep the kite/turbine airborne.
 
 
Harry

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
CC: adjf20@sussex.ac.uk
From: SeattleDL@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:24:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [AirborneWindEnergy] makani- turbines on kites?



Thanks Allister,

That is the first I had heard of makani "running the turbine backwards" to provide propulsion during wind lulls. While the idea of flying turbine h/w is a bit scary to some, if this works, it would be a charming solution to their no-wind issue (similar to that which might be potentially available for the Italian KiteGEN scheme, but likely less fraught with complications) .

While using airborne turbines may extract an efficiency toll (drag induced by lift), "absolute efficiency" is not a particularly compelling parameter when the "raw energy source" is free!  All that counts is that the net efficiency maps into an economically attractive outcome in terms of "return on investment" (assuming that the game here is to "take on the fossil-fuel folks").

Dave L



At 4:35 PM +0000 5/14/09, allisterfurey wrote:


Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 130 From: christopher carlin Date: 5/14/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
Having been involved in large high altitude UAVs my initial gut reaction is they are smoking dope. I agree that you could do what they propose but I think the vehicle involved to produce meaningful power levels would be enormous and you would need to fly this thing around on the end of its tether over quite a large range to chase winds and keep it aloft when no wind existed. To put it in perspective I flew a 200 foot wingspan UAV against 135 mph jet stream with about 270 horsepower. Without going through lots of calculation I think that means a useful generating system would need to be orders of magnitude larger. Put another way ground based wind turbines have blades perhaps 100 feet long and power generation modules the size of a 747 nacelle. To get a serious benefit of going to altitude you really have to go up to the jet stream which is up around 30,000 feet and only in a relatively small geographic area and moves around significantly. Bottom line is these things would be enormous and in the real world would have some terrific maintenance and safety problems. My gut feel it is it would be easier to deploy a large solar array to synchronous orbit and beam the power back to earth. This was proposed years ago and is fairly practical. The primary problem is that some view it as easy to weaponize and as result no one has ever seen fit to let it be developed. All of the above simply my opinion unsupported by calculation or facts.

Regards,

Chris    
On May 14, 2009, at 5:35 PM, allisterfurey wrote:


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 131 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/15/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
thanks Christopher....Interesting and thought provoking post.

Here are some comments that may have bearing on some of things you were discussing.

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 132 From: dave santos Date: 5/17/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
DaveL & Allister, Chris's gut is correct, cheap reliable AWE based on existing UAV tech is crazy. To be fair to Makani, do not expect them to easily grasp how numerous hidden Lyapunov instabilities in their neglected state machine cripple their AWE model. This level of insight requires KiteLab ;^)
 
Decades of UAV safety & reliability data amounts to this- UAVs are roughly 1/100th as safe as international airworthiness standards for human piloted aviation. Adding a tether to the flakey UAV degrades reliability another order of magnitude (adds a large positive Lyapunov exponent, formal hyperchaos). 
 
It takes hundreds of thousands of flight hours, billions of dollars, & thousands of actual aerospace engineers to find enough fatal attractors in the state-machine to ensure reliability in a new class of aircraft. Count on Makani, with Google's deep pockets, to futz on a grand scale for the popular press & hide low reliability behind a "stealthy entrepreneur" biz PR facade. Small-scale low-altitude cheap simple AWE is currently practical & will lead the way to future perfection.
 
Chris, the peculiar power of a hot tethered foil is unlike powered flight run backwards, where power remains constant. A tethered foil flies several times faster than the true wind in monstrous bursts of power (limited only as D finally exceeds L at higher Reynolds & effects like panel-flutter set in). This acceleration feeds back on itself, power increasing exponentially (cubed in the ideal, roughly squared in real life). The lure is real.
 
Allister, faster more powerful winds aloft are not necessarily "steadier". Fast wind is after all a higher Reynolds regime & turbulent shear at altitude is common in & around many objects like ordinary jets & convection cells. Do not be fooled by Makani hyping a desirable average, a proper aircraft is designed to the worst-case. Upper wind may have less high frequency noise but has higher amplitudes which can be even more destructive. These spectrums are anyway self similar fractals across scale.
 
Once clear of the surface, wind reliability with altitude seems to increase slower than the uncertainty flying higher itself adds. Lower & slower is much cheaper. Its revealing that a poor kite buggyist can buy a NPW (NASA Power Wing) for about half the capital-cost of an equivalent parafoil, fly it short-lined in supposedly dirtier air, & still be in the game. Newbes to kite sports fly short-lined because its easier, despite surface layer turbulence.
 
To earn airworthiness certification twin engine aircraft must have take-off "go-around" capability on a single engine. Makini's twin rotor needs this capability. These rotors are to operate in impeller or propeller modes. Problem is foil camber is reversed between an optimal impeller v. propeller, so one mode must be favored, or a symmetrical foil section used, either way its an efficiency cut. VTOL to fast level flight has a troubled history. Sky Windpower seems to have a configuration advantage for take-off & landing with big turbine blades. Makani's turbines spin quite close the the tether bridle & will cause a certain level of spectacular crashes.
 
Conventional gliders have long been towed aloft, an ideal study model. This is the most dangerous part of the flight, requiring hyper-vigilance. Lock-out is the sudden hook into the ground if the tethered/towed object strays a bit from a narrow flyable envelope. Without a conventional empennage (tail), especially where the propulsion stream impinges on the control surface at low speeds, Makani's tailless configuration is a crash-prone choice. Empennage has lately crept back onto hot hanggliders.
 
As an electric-flight design-build master George Parks long ago taught me, wing loading is the best crude predictor of initial reliability. Makani's concept has ultrahigh wingloading, very bad news. For a final astounding risk, what Makani proposes is an aerobatic UAV. Aerobatics is a most difficult & dangerous flight mode, suitable control theory does not even exist yet.
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 133 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
DaveL,
 
Chris's strong "gut" response was cited in contrast your (& Allister's) lesser sense of conviction about whether Makani's AWE model is unsound & the start-up is incompetent to accomplish it.
 
Engine-out fly capability is a traditional requirement for twin airworthiness. The FAA has not developed extensive UAV regulations. UAVs operate under special waivers & don't meet many common safety standards. If Makani's UAV must crash when one motor-turbine dies, Ouch. 
 
It is our informed duty to insist on the highest AWE safety standard & possibly even suggest to the FAA that any giant twin tethered UAV must retain the traditional twin failsafe capability (or at least equivalent safety), if it is to receive airworthiness certification for the general NAS, even if Makani fights for monopolistic exemptions.
 
This is our current FAA liaison, a set of draft AWE experimenter guidelines are being developed for George's review-
 
"George.J.Jackowski@faa.gov" George.J.Jackowski@faa.gov
 
Makani, we can both agree is not "overtly" harming anyone. My opinion is they covertly cause harm, secrecy is, after all, their chosen culture. The classic patent trolling is damning evidence. Failure to file required NOTAMs may be a second count of covert damage to the common good.
 
Makani & Google could have adopted (& still can) a much more open model. The investment could (can) have been diversified. They just didn't start out on that beautiful path, so negative reactions by open advocates like me are as natural as the admiration of those who deeply believe in stealth.
 
The final flow of capital to sound solutions is a fine thing, but more fundamental is the identification of the solutions. We don't need millions to think clearly, its just hard to witness the waste, which i saw first hand in 2007 at Makani's rented ex-Naval base in Alameda. Maui is not the best cheap wind for testing, but a characteristic vanity by the company One might easily double current academic AWE funding worldwide or fund a lot of freed IP out of this waste.
 
ds
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 134 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
DaveS, Thanks for the clarifications.

BTW, didn't the FAA's "traditional one-engine-out TO capability" for aircraft evolve in consideration of safety for the folks on-board?  .....ironically, the last I had heard, more folks had died during "one-engine out" training  than in actual one-engine-out emergencies :-/

DaveL


At 2:14 PM -0700 5/18/09, santos137@yahoo.com wrote:
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 135 From: dave santos Date: 5/18/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
DaveL,
 
Engine-out capability designed into twins saves lives, but the training protocol has been flawed, needless risk. Lesson: some emergencies are too grave to practice, use a simulator. Testing Makani's engine-out performance (& other such scenarios) clearly won't risk a human pilot & will inform about the risk to lives on the ground.. As the UAV safety paper linked recently made clear, lives on the ground are a critical priority limiting the acceptability of UAV technology.
 
My prediction is that Makani's overly complex & heavy prototypes will almost never fly for more than a few minutes, hours, or weeks before a very expensive crash (best case). Bunkers should be required around Makani's crash zones, its just too much mass-energy flying around. 
 
Hope nobody gets hurt,
 
DaveS
 
 
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 136 From: Dave Lang Date: 5/19/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
Points of clarification....

DaveS,  I was not referring to "Chris's gut" regarding UAV's and AWE, but rather addressing his analytical analogy of "how little horsepower is required to fly his UAV" as somehow implying how ineffective energy harvest would be for high altitude AWE devices.....I personally don't buy this analogy. Again, I repeat, Chris'  UAV was designed to  extract  minimum energy from the airstream....an AWE device is designed to extract maximum energy from the airstream.....

Do you happen to know the FAA Flight Certification Regulation Number. specifying that twin-engine UAV's must have engine-out takeoff capability?

Regarding makani, I don't see that they are overtly hurting anybody!  I don't think one can view the makani team as having somehow usurped resources from the rest of the AWE world......one may certainly disagree with the "style of the stewardship" of  such resources (which of course is simply second guessing the guy with the money).  I know many outside makani who feel that they would have conducted a somewhat different (and to themselves, more effective) stewardship of such grand resources (but, they suffer from the the fact that they are not the ones with the resources).  A compellingly good AWE idea should sooner or later attract appropriate business capital. With makani, the process "started with the capital".....the other AWE visionaries will have to be the ones "ending with capital"....ie. will have to earn it :-)

DaveL


At 9:53 AM -0700 5/17/09, dave santos wrote:
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 137 From: harry valentine Date: 5/19/2009
Subject: Re: makani- turbines on kites?
Thanks for the clarification. There is great support growing for expanded wind power, worldwide. Officials across Western Europe, North Africa and the Middle East have all been advised of high-elevation wind power through various magazine articles. So far the LadderMill from Delft University and the kite system from Italy have gained attention.
 
Harry
 

To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
CC: santos137@yahoo.com
From: SeattleDL@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:09:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [AirborneWindEnergy] makani- turbines on kites?



Points of clarification. ...

DaveS,  I was not referring to "Chris's gut" regarding UAV's and AWE, but rather addressing his analytical analogy of "how little horsepower is required to fly his UAV" as somehow implying how ineffective energy harvest would be for high altitude AWE devices..... I personally don't buy this analogy. Again, I repeat, Chris'  UAV was designed to  extract  minimum energy from the airstream... .an AWE device is designed to extract maximum energy from the airstream... ..

Do you happen to know the FAA Flight Certification Regulation Number. specifying that twin-engine UAV's must have engine-out takeoff capability?

Regarding makani, I don't see that they are overtly hurting anybody!  I don't think one can view the makani team as having somehow usurped resources from the rest of the AWE world......one may certainly disagree with the "style of the stewardship" of  such resources (which of course is simply second guessing the guy with the money).  I know many outside makani who feel that they would have conducted a somewhat different (and to themselves, more effective) stewardship of such grand resources (but, they suffer from the the fact that they are not the ones with the resources).  A compellingly good AWE idea should sooner or later attract appropriate business capital. With makani, the process "started with the capital".....the other AWE visionaries will have to be the ones "ending with capital"....ie. will have to earn it :-)

DaveL


At 9:53 AM -0700 5/17/09, dave santos wrote:


Windows Live helps you keep up with all your friends, in one place.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 138 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/20/2009
Subject: Welcome new member Darin Selby
================== Welcome Darin Selby

Last week some welcome e-mails arrived. Darin Selby has a joyous footprint on the Internet. His travels seed landscapes and mentalscapes with memorable and challenging images, drawings, ideas, and built mechanical explorations. DreamCatcherMobile, Whale's Tail stiff-tether wing ...near kite... generator, child's swinging energy converter, and many other things. Hold onto your hats when you explore his drawings; a short phrase on a drawing frequently opens large doors of exploration. Darin is gathering his own talents and those of some of his friends to explore energy kite systems; he has quickly progressed from considering first some airborne wind energy systems with generator aloft and conductive tether with some unique suggestions ....and onward to ground-based generators with some advance over the WPI Kite Team rocking arm kite system.

Darin seems to fly easily in many dimensions: illustration, patents, robotics, mechanics, energy, lever words, rotation, social needs, green passions, and more. Already my kiting is graced with Darin's sharings; he is open sourcing his innovations.

Here is a Net introduction; we will be hearing from Darin and frends in this forum:

http://current.com/items/88337461_rickshaw-philosopher.htm http://www.energykitesystems.net/nomad/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/DarinSelby8888LIFT

Cheers,
JoeF
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 139 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/21/2009
Subject: Re: Welcome new member Darin Selby
Joe, thanks for the very colorful introduction.  I am glad that I've already been able to contribute just a small part to an already phenomenal bank of unique and far-reaching ideas, which are coming from actual builders and adventurers.  

If someone is interested in building proof-of-concept prototypes of my ideas, I am also to prepared to travel to your area to make it all happen.

I have 20 years experience with a variety of handyman skills and abilities; to assist in bringing one of my designs off the computer screen, and into reality.

With the many links that Joe and Dave have already sent to me, my kite generator learning curve is happening fast!  

This is definitely the most interesting and practical information, on alternative alternative energy, that I have yet to come across!  

Drawings soon to come on the addition of a gravity-assist with the WPI kite generator design.   ~Darin 




To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: joefaust333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:58:05 +0000
Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] Welcome new member Darin Selby




============ ====== Welcome Darin Selby

Last week some welcome e-mails arrived. Darin Selby has a joyous footprint on the Internet. His travels seed landscapes and mentalscapes with memorable and challenging images, drawings, ideas, and built mechanical explorations. DreamCatcherMobile, Whale's Tail stiff-tether wing ...near kite... generator, child's swinging energy converter, and many other things. Hold onto your hats when you explore his drawings; a short phrase on a drawing frequently opens large doors of exploration. Darin is gathering his own talents and those of some of his friends to explore energy kite systems; he has quickly progressed from considering first some airborne wind energy systems with generator aloft and conductive tether with some unique suggestions ....and onward to ground-based generators with some advance over the WPI Kite Team rocking arm kite system.

Darin seems to fly easily in many dimensions: illustration, patents, robotics, mechanics, energy, lever words, rotation, social needs, green passions, and more. Already my kiting is graced with Darin's sharings; he is open sourcing his innovations.

Here is a Net introduction; we will be hearing from Darin and frends in this forum:

http://current. com/items/ 88337461_ rickshaw- philosopher. htm http://www.energyki tesystems. net/nomad/ index.html
http://tinyurl. com/DarinSelby88 88LIFT

Cheers,
JoeF




Hotmail® has a new way to see what's up with your friends. Check it out.
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 140 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Firefighting Kites
Making water run "uphill" by kites can replace much of the electricity & fossil fuel currently used to move water. KiteLab demonstrated simple & practical kite water pumping at WSKIF 2008. An upcoming report will detail kite irrigation.
 
Kites can particularly revolutionize the fighting of wild fires since the same high winds that fan flames enable kite work. Kites could stem fires not otherwise addressable. In remote locations fuel supplies limit conventional fire fighting. Not so with kites which extract energy on site. The very inflow & updrafts of a firestorm can actually enhance kite fire fighting.
 
No current alternative energy technology transports easier or deploys faster than kites, which makes them attractive for emergencies. Kite systems replace far more expensive & dangerous helicopters for the firefighting job, & are operable by less trained personnel. Lifter kites used for energy production & kite irrigation pumps could be quickly diverted to a distant fire emergency by conventional transport. Property savings from a single successful operation might far exceed the capital cost of the kites.
 
By techniques covered in the "string tripod" post many things are possible. Kite arches strung across the path of a racing wild fire could direct suppression anywhere along a line. Kite lifted & driven aerial cableways can run in any direction from water to fire, even upwind. A fire-hose can be kite lifted over obstacles cross-country to provide continuous flow. A giant kite, kite-tail, or line-laundry might work as a flame retardant fire-break or simply snuff a localized fire. Firefighters can maintain a safe standoff distance & be more effective.
 
Kites can do many other emergency functions, even direct rescue. Evacuating people & property in general disasters like flooding is possible.
 
Application Notes:
 
Almost any surface water will do, even very shallow sources. A helibucket is a suspended canvas bag lowered into water to fill, then lifted & dumped over flames. An improved helibucket could work like a variable parachute controlled by an apex line. The "chute" is laid down to fill up & then  lifted & carried away. To dump, the apex line is held as the "risers" are slacked, pouring water out the gores in as many streams in a good scatter pattern.
 
Nylon line is much more heat resistant than spectra, but piano wire or steel rope could take high temperature (~1500 F).
 
 
 

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 141 From: Dan Fink Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites
Hello all -- I must assume that I was added to this list for reason, so
here it is.....

In addition to being a renewable energy author, I have been a
firefighter for over 10 years. I am a paid consultant with a variety of
different fire departments, companies and agencies involved in RE safety
with fire in urban-interface situations. My article sidebar on off-grid
PV systems and wildland firefighting is in the current issue of Home
Power Magazine.

I think there are some serious misconceptions in some items in this post
(comments embedded in snipped text below):



santos137@yahoo.com wrote:
Unstable airmasses are almost always involved in wildland fires. Then
once a wildfire becomes plume-dominated, the changes in air movement can
be drastic and violent. If a plume (the center of a Pyrocumulous cloud)
collapses due to changing weather conditions, downdraft winds of up to
(and over) 100 mph can start, blowing in all directions at ground level,
and firefighters have died and will die if not advised. What would a
straight downward wind burst of 100 mph plus for 10-15 minutes do to a
fully-laden kite water pumping system?


Kites could stem
The concept of applying water to a wildfire to extinguish it is a common
public misconception. All airborne firefighting resources (there are NO
exceptions) are used to buy time for firefighters on the ground, who are
cutting a wide fire line down to mineral soil using either shovels,
Pulaskis, chainsaws, and McLeods (or dozers and feller-bunchers and of
course the very vulnerable human sawyers and swampers).

The airborne resource (chopper, heavy tanker, SEAT) 'paints' precision
lines of retardant for the hand or helitack crew, so that they face 6
inch flame lengths instead of 6 feet.


In remote locations fuel supplies limit
How so? if a wildland fire incident moves even from local to Type 3, you
won't believe how much diesel and gas arrive on scene how fast at the
ICP. If it's so remote that no homes are threatened, then why even try
to put it out?

Not so with kites which extract energy on
Have you ever watched a Pyrocumulous cloud closely, or been underneath
one in person? I have. You have NO idea what it's like......Hmmmmm. I'd
LOVE to fly a kite with anyone under a Pyrocululous, but usually the
dire situation precludes such frivolity.


If I get on my radio and say "I need a SEAT right now to paint a line
between the head of the fire and this house that I am protecting" it's
here in under 30 minutes with 400 gallons of retardant. The drive time
for a 'kite crew' to my location is what? Takes over an hour drive from
town, even at code 3 response. Then add kite deployment time. After that
long delay, nobody will stop any fires in my remote, heavily wooded,
mountain area. The faster you hit a wildland fire, the easier it is to
put out. I'm talking minutes, not hours or days.

Kite
Helicopters are used in wildland firefighting as a "pinpoint" resource.
They can drop only a small amount of water, but within 10 feet of where
it is needed. AGAIN, dropping water on a wildfire to put it out is NOT a
real-world solution. It does not work. You don't have enough BTUs of
water to put out even a small wildfire no matter how large your airship
is. You instead drop water or retardant along open areas to make the
flames smaller when the hand crew arrives at the painted line to dig
real line. There are not enough C130s, 747s, and Sikorsky Skycranes on
earth to actually "extinguish" even a moderately sized wildfire with water.

A big chopper can suck 1000 gallons of H2O from a pond 15 miles away,
then dump it within a 10 foot radius of where the ground crew tells them
to, in under 30 minutes from the initial radio call from IC. How can a
kite do this? Wildfires are best fought within minutes of their
ignition, while they are small. Otherwise, all we can do is try to
contain them.


Lifter kites
Energy production is not an issue. Most fire apparatus have PTO
generators at 20kW and above capacity. In a truly remote situation, why
even put the fire out? To save trees? Themselves, the public, and
(lastly) homes are the (in order) priorities of firefighters. Why die
for a few trees? Dumping water on the trees won't help in the slightest,
it's all a war of BTUs.

Property
Under what time frame could firefighting kites to lay fireline be
deployed? Minutes, hours, days? Who steers them? The "painted" fireline
must be precise within 100 feet at worst to save a home. Where does the
water come from? If there's a big water source nearby, it's much cheaper
to deploy gasoline portapumps at each residence with a sprinkler system.



Kite lifted & driven aerial
Wildfires move FAST. How does the FFkite deployment time (including
driving to the usually remote area of the fire) factor into this? Looks
to me before you get the kite crew out of bed, the required fireline
distance that would need to be covered could be miles, and the
deployment time measured in days or weeks.



A giant kite, kite-tail, or line-laundry might work
Only if it works. If not, your FFs are is BIG trouble and risk of death.
An improved helibucket could work like a
Huh....around my neck of the woods, the nearest big water source (a
lake) is 15 miles away, surrounded my high, rugged mountains and a deep
canyon.

You are saying you could actually fly a KITE 15 miles away from my
place, dip water with a Bambi bucket, then fly it back to my house and
dump a fire line with 100 foot precision between my place and the head
of the fire? Amongst mountain peaks 2000 feet high?

Not sure if that's what you mean, but if so, well don't be surprised at
my reaction. If there's a wildland fire and I'm IC, I need a precision
line of retardant painted RIGHT NOW (under an hour response time at
most). I have no clue how you could do this with a kite, especially
considering my response area is 126 square miles of high mountains
(10,000 feet plus) and deep canyons.

Thanks for the post and opportunity to reply, but I remain most skeptical --
DAN FINK
co-author, "Homebrew Wind Power" 978-0-9819201-0-8
Contributing author, Home Power Magazine, Back Home Magazine, Lighting
Today Magazine, and more.


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 142 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites
For many positive reasons you are welcome to AWE, Dan. Your leadership in the wind turbine universe is just one reason. Your authoring, firefighting, and renewable energy leaderships are invited to AWE. The lessons you have mastered in towered wind energy will have some play in airborned turbines.

Scratching for inroads by kite systems to save on coal and oil use in the firefighting realms is neither new nor a finished effort; in the striving there may be placed on the consideration table feasibles and infeasibles.

Niche applications of kite systems within the global firefighting effort would need to prove themselves; so very many actions have so little trial yet. Out of exploration may come some fine direct firefighting uses of kites. Advancing materials will widen some uses.

In a patent assigned to the Boeing company is a description of a use of kites in firefighting (filed in 1997) by two Californians: John E. Davis and Vernon R. Creekmore
http://tinyurl.com/FFkiteObservationPost

My bent is still to be in the questioning stage to see how kites might play a role in reducing use of coal and oil in firefighting:

1. Kites for observing and reporting hot spots?

2. Could large kites help cut open-soil lines by dragging brush-clearing tools?

3. Could kite systems help drop fire retardant in some niche circumstances?

4. Could high-temperature tolerating kite systems help extract stranded people?

5. Could kites cool a region by misting the area?

6. Could kites play a role in observing lands for fires in order to alert firefighters?

7. Could kites play a part in rapidly transporting firefighters and equipment in certain niche circumstances?

8. Could kytooned fences slow wind and reduce a fire's progress?

9. Could a lifter kytoon hold a pulley that helps lay a retardant belt across a long line?

10. ? [[Open for other seed questions.]]

Low-time rural firefighter...where my best strategy was to set back fires to establish an open-soil no-more-fuel line; I nearly started the Antelope Valley on fire...ouch!
JoeF
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 143 From: dave santos Date: 5/22/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites
Dan,
 
Thanks for the detailed & very useful critique of the fire fighting kite concept. It was an exercise in imagination in need of reality. You were asked on this list for the critical thinking you showed spotting the Magenn fantasy.
 
Historic & much existing fire fighting is water-based, high risk, & often inadequate. Fire fighting is more fossil fuel & capital sensitive than desirable. Climate change science predicts more fires. Disregarding kites might be negligence.
 
Pyrocumulus structure looks like standard "explosive" convection, the structure is generally navigable if the aircraft is strong enough, as hurricane flights suggest. Kites can surely deploy as fast as many existing responses, such as moving people into place.
 
The only reason kites, as cheap sustainable aviation, couldn't chip away at existing fire fighting problem would be for lack of trying, a cultural choice. The daunting challenge of mountain fires with remote water sources is a good one. Would a scale demo of realistic technical difficulty dent your skepticism?
 
Note that kites can in principle deliver varied materials (how about sand/dirt ?) & bulldoze firebreaks.
 
daveS
 
PS Agreed, your tower beats a kite round the homestead, but to travel the world by wind power, leave the tower at home & use kites ;^)
 



Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 144 From: dave santos Date: 5/23/2009
Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites
Dan,
 
Thanks again for your expertise in fire fighting. Aviation is my background & it can be a blinding focus. More notes based on Web search & reflection-
 
Fire Fighting Kites is a very novel idea, no immediate hits for the concept.
 
Aviation is a primary resource in combating wildfires, with many roles. If nothing else, the essential spotting function might easily be enhanced by cheap KAP (Kite Assisted Photography).
 
Pilots freely operate around conflagrations by avoiding the same structures around pyrocumulus cumulonimbus as in normal aviation around storm cells. A stationary cell tends to self limit as the convection column collapses on itself as rain. Planes can operate all around. Kites can in fact be sustained on inflow winds which are "normal" in character.
 
A cell in a prevailing wind gradient tips over downwind & powerful downdrafts called microbursts are created. These localized zones are to be avoided. Virga, where rain evaporates into a falling mass of chilled air is particularly powerful. The winds around a downburst radiate in all directions, but are generally fairly shallow surface effects. A firefighter who witnesses such surface mayhem can well despair over the possibility of aviation operations. Navigating microbursts in commercial aviation is well developed. Modern airports & airliners have wind-shear detectors (mostly X band Doppler radar) that allow for avoidance of shear.
 
Terrain & multiple pyrocumulus cells can complicate the picture beyond practical comprehension. There are wild fires where no human agency has much effect & the dangers are totally unmanageable. Ironically kites might be a last desperate resort in some situations (like property defense)  due to the expendibility of the materiel v. human life & conventional aircraft. 
 
Water is still a primary retardant, best used directly on flames. A spectrum of mostly water vehicle based chemical retardant mixtures are used ahead of a fire. Dirt & sand can potentially serve as a ready retardant where water is unavailable. Fire-break creation by kite might solve some logistic gaps.
 
Conclusion: Kite Assisted Fire Fighting is an open question, worthy of study & experimentation despite clear challenges. The essential role of conventional aviation in wildfire suppression is the best general predictor of the potential for alternative aviation to also serve.
 
No?
 
DaveS
 
 


Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 145 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/23/2009
Subject: TwinD
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 146 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: TwinD
Can these two kytoons ever get tangled up, say in high, unpredictable winds?


To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
From: joefaust333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:29:50 +0000
Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] TwinD

Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 147 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Re: TwinD
Yes, Darin. TwinD did not express "kytoon", only balloon. E
Either type: Tangle can occur, if line and bas insufficent.

That and other reasons move some thinking toward the One-Kite-Solutions
OKS
http://www.energykitesystems.net/JoeFaust/AWE/smarttwokite.jpg

Keep 'em untangled and flying ...
Cheers,
JoeF
Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 148 From: dave santos Date: 5/24/2009
Subject: Novel "Half Delta" Prototype Video
Attachments :
    Hi all,
     
    While testing bird response to a realistic hawk delta kite the back stick fell out. The kite did not fall, but maintained stable flight at low angle with a vigorous flapping of the folded-together wings. This seems a previously unrecognized class of kite, a stable self-sustaining battened-membrane wing-mill.
     
    So i made a "half delta" kite (eliminating a whole wing & two spars) & made the attached video. The new kite has many interesting new features. It self relaunches reliably (a delta won't), has ultra low snag/tangle potential & gives a pulsing tug from the power zone which may be suitable for AWE.
     
    daveS
    KiteLab
     
    PS Turbines mounted along a battened-membrane wing-mill suspended under a lifter are working well, passive control with lower mass than related concepts, more soon.
     
     

      @@attachment@@
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 149 From: Darin Selby Date: 5/24/2009
    Subject: Re: A wind-up motor with the TwinD
    Joe, after studying this picture diagram, I agree that it could be the solution to the kite generator evolution!


    still would be a beneficial item as the kite ascends in its figure 8 path.  Since the tether would have a reciprocating back-and-forth motion through the generator, the pulling direction could wind up the motor (more effort), to then be released as the kite descends in its figure 8 path.  ~Darin




    To: AirborneWindEnergy@yahoogroups.com
    From: joefaust333@gmail.com
    Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:34:58 +0000
    Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] Re: TwinD



    Yes, Darin. TwinD did not express "kytoon", only balloon. E
    Either type: Tangle can occur, if line and bas insufficent.

    That and other reasons move some thinking toward the One-Kite-Solutions
    OKS
    http://www.energyki tesystems. net/JoeFaust/ AWE/smarttwokite .jpg

    Keep 'em untangled and flying ...
    Cheers,
    JoeF




    Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out.
    Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 150 From: Joe Faust Date: 5/24/2009
    Subject: Re: A wind-up motor with the TwinD
    Attachments :
      Darin,
           Spring motor for aloft actions seems a great suggestion. I put a
      note on the attached drawing. DaveS' ballast is included in TipB.

      The server for the link for the ametekhunterspring seems to be having
      a challenge.

      This post is my first effort at placing an attachment from my Gmail
      sending to group.

      Cheers,
      JoeF
        @@attachment@@
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 151 From: dave santos Date: 5/27/2009
      Subject: Kite Driven String Tripod & "Perpetual" Towing
      Two missing AWE solutions-

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 152 From: Dan Fink Date: 5/27/2009
      Subject: Re: Firefighting Kites
      Joe, Dave, thanks for the kind words.
      I *do* see some specific and realistic applications here that I had not
      thought of, thanks to your replies. More below.DAN


      Absolutely. Typically a single fire engine resource with 2 firefighters
      must drive (or hike) to a a high spot to observe, and may be posted
      there for hours / days on rotating shifts. Aerial resources are also
      used for observation such as spotter planes and helicopters, but these
      are difficult to get, expensive, and are often already committed to
      water/retardant drops supporting ground crews who are doing structure
      protection.
      I dunno -- usually it's dozers in the hills, or tractor plows on the
      flatlands. A dozer boss usually walks ahead of the cat, directing it on
      where to anchor the line.
      Not sure on these ...
      Yes -=- as long as there is a large water supply, misting a residential
      property is common practice. Type I and Type II incident teams usually
      carry sprinkler equipment.
      Absolutely; if the kites had remote steerable video cameras. Add a
      thermal imaging camera and it could be very useful.

      I'll think I'll pass on this ride and take the helicopter....but I'd
      love to watch you folks take a ride ;-)
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 153 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/4/2009
      Subject: AWE with Tensairity from Empa
       
      4June2009
      Link notice supplied by Darin Selby
      News link.   Empa , tensairity in kites, Center for Synergetic Structures, Rolf Luchsinger, Tensairity Kite, an 8 meter span effort, aiming to generate electricity, test site: Bernese Oberland, aiming for a 30 meter span with helium in tensairity members for solving challenge aloft-stay during calm,  spindle-shaped tensairity,

      Empa home page for "New fields of application for lightweight construction elements. Lightweight wings for a high-flying kite"
            Related:   Tensairity 

      Center for Synergetic Structures
      Tel. +41 44 823 40 90
      rolf.luchsinger@empa.c

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 154 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/4/2009
      Subject: Switch Grass Biomass & Kite Hybrid Generation
      Switch grass is a dominant prairie grass native to North America. It has been shown superior to corn as a biofuel, thriving on marginal land with much less care & capital inputs. Switch grass production is natural to the Mid West wind belt where wind energy is especially favored.
       
      There is a natural compatibility with the two energy technologies. Grass & wind energy do not bother each other & the land thus yields a double energy crop
       
      Switch grass & energy kites combined may be the most energetically intensive land-use model for renewable energy.

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 156 From: dave santos Date: 6/5/2009
      Subject: Former Makani Engineer Seeking Employment
       
      Scott should be able to greatly clarify debate about whether aerospace UAV style AWE can soon meet real-world safety, reliability, & economic standards. Lets hope he will continue in the field,
       
      daveS
       
      =========included resume==========
       
      Scott Parker

      LEADER
      PROJECT MANAGER
      MECHATRONIC ENGINEER

      +1 510 409 9608
      carboninfusion at gmail.com

      Able to relocate at short notice.

      Professional Profile
      Highly motivated with strong project management and leadership skills
      Excellent communicator across all levels of the organization and external stakeholders
      Talented engineer with broad experience in mechanical design, analysis and fabrication

      Education
      1998 � 2003 Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) (Mechatronics) University of Sydney
      1998 - 2003 Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting/Marketing) University of Sydney

      Experience
      2007 - 2009 Makani Power, Inc.
      Team Lead: Wing build and integration
      Test / Mechanical Engineer

      Makani Power is a Google funded renewable energy startup based in San Francisco that seeks to harness high alti�tude wind energy using high performance tethered wings. Scott earned a reputation for leadership both on and off the runway.

      Responsible for project management and systems engineering of new carbon fiber Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).
      Responsible for field testing early stage high altitude wind power prototypes.

      OVERVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENTS

      Team Lead: Wing build and integration
      � Delivered a 5.5m carbon fiber �flying wing� to schedule and within budget.
      � Managed 35% of the company�s engineering and technical staff. Twelve team members in total.
      � Managed a team of engineers, consultants and fabricators through the design, analysis and build stages of the wing. Design and specifications evolved on a daily basis and required flexibility, problem solving and creativity. Focus and motivation was maintained through regular team meetings, individual goal setting and performance reviews.
      � Accountable for system integration. Chaired a weekly design review of avionics, controls, wing structure, ground station and tether integration. Workshop style reviews addressed issues such as avionics architecture, failure mode analysis, communication redundancy, brownout protection, safety protocols and flight testing.
      � Established internal composites fabrication facility for resin infusion, prepreg, bladder molding and wet fabrication. Designed, built and installed 250F temperature controlled ovens. Largest was 5MW and 20 feet long.
      � Ensured reliability of design through critical design review with Boeing consultants early in the design phase. Also brought in an independent composites expert to train staff over a 4 month period and a mold fairing craftsman on short term hire.
      � Fabricated upper and lower skin tools using machined tooling foam for master molds and resin infusion for final carbon tools. Tools for other components, such as shear walls and winglets, were fabricated in steel or machined aluminum according to schedule constraints, composite fabrication technique and surface finish requirements.
      � Organized fabrication and analysis of prepreg test samples to determine allowables for FEA. Samples were prepared according to ASTM standards and tested to failure on an in-house Instron. Allowables for stress, strain and ultimate strength were estimated for various uni-directional and woven fabric prepregs.
      � Specified and designed carbon fiber landing skids. Performed FEA analysis (including buckling) using Siemens NX and MSC Nastran. Designed three-part tooling using 3D rapid prototyping. Fabricated parts using prepregs and vacuum bagging.
      � Fabricated skins, shear walls, ribs, nose caps, hatches, wiring conduit, motor mounts and landing gear.
      � Oversaw complete stress, buckling, flutter analysis and ply optimization of the entire flying wing structure.

      Test / Mechanical Engineer
      � Led field testing of wind power prototypes at three sites: Alameda Naval Airstrip, Haiku on the north side of Maui and Kaupo Gap on the extremely remote eastern side of Maui. Tests required FAA approval. Flights often extended over 30 hours. Testing team ranged from 3 to 10 people.
      � Established and executed safety protocols, test plans and test procedures. Minimizing risk was paramount to a successful testing program. This required risk analysis, hazard identification and initiating preventative action.
      � Made executive decisions regarding all aspects of field testing including personnel safety, launch/land command, hardware changes and software modifications.
      � Maintained clear thought process in highly stressful situations. Eg. Tuning autonomous flight controller during gale force wind and rain at 4am.
      � Achieved challenging technical milestones ahead of schedule. eg. Successive 24 hr autonomous flights
      � Demonstrated prototype systems to existing and potential investors.
      � Continuously extended the flight envelope by finding and pushing hardware and software systems to their limits.
      � Worked with a �skeleton� crew to maintain, debug and repair mechanical, electrical and software components at remote test sites.
      � Manually piloted remotely controlled tethered aircraft in a range of extreme conditions including gale force winds, high heat/humidity and continuous night/day/night cycles. Aircraft ranged from large semi-rigid kites to small rigid wings. 35 m/s ground speed typical.
      � Trained and experienced in providing First Aid. Experience began at the age of 17, saving the life of a drowned woman via CPR.


      2005 � 2007 Tenix Pty Ltd
      Project Engineer: Tenix Investments, Commercialization
      Mechanical Engineer: Tenix Defense, Electronic Systems

      Secret security clearance
      During his employment Tenix was Australia�s largest defense contractor in the private sector (Defense division since bought by BAE). Contracts covered the entire defense space including marine, land, aviation and electronic systems.
      Scott was selected for the Tenix graduate rotation program. This provided recent graduates the opportunity to experience a variety of engineering and commercial roles over a 3 year period. The program also provided extensive training courses in leadership, project management, teamwork, ethics and presentation.

      OVERVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENTS

      Project Engineer: Tenix Investments, Commercialization
      � Responsible for all aspects of product commercialization including technical due diligence, development of financial models, writing business plans, preparing government grant applications and development and structuring of finance.
      � Conducted due diligence on a multispectral infrared camera technology capable of long range ash and SO2 detection. Field tested the technology at three active volcanoes (Mt St Helens, Mt Kilauea and Montserrat). Collected market research through meetings with potential customers, scientists and other end users.
      � Evaluated a bioagent detection system at Sandia National Laboratory and installed the first prototype at a water substation in Glendale, Arizona.
      � Evaluated a GPS-based tracking technology developed by US startup Zontrak. Installed the system in downtown Melbourne, Australia to provide real-time tracking of parking inspectors (meter maids). This involved collaboration with local council, selling the concept to parking inspectors, physical installation of the base station network and customer training.
      � Negotiated a term sheet with venture capital firm, Epicorp
      � Drafted an AusIndustry government grant application to match investment dollars on a 1:1 basis. This required a five year projection of financials including P&L, balance sheet and cash flow.


      Mechatronic Engineer: Tenix Defense, Electronic Systems
      � Designed a 2-axis stabilized gimbal video camera payload for the Aerosonde unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).
      � Worked with the customer, the Defense Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), to define a specification and feature list.
      � Completed the mechanical design of the gimbal and integrated the control system components required for active stabilization.
      � Developed and integrated the associated ground station application in MFC. This included a graphical user interface for displaying live video with synchronized geo-location data, remote steering via joystick, machine-in-the-loop object following and a multitude of camera features.
      � Demonstrated the system live from the 2006 Avalon Airshow in Melbourne, Australia. While video and flight stats from the Aerosonde UAV were streamed to the pavilion, features and benefits of the system were demonstrated to potential customers.
      � Transformed the prototype system into a product and assisted with design of marketing collateral. Three units were sold to the original customer (DSTO) and one to the University of Sydney for use in the DARPA Grand Challenge.


      2002 - 2004
      � Started a web design company providing event photography service to tourism-based companies in Sydney, Australia.
      � Developed a proprietary carbon fiber resin infusion technology
      � Installed a linux firewall and several database applications for a small IT company


      Training
      New Product Innovation 2005 Marcus Evans
      Systems Engineering 2004 EC&S Systems Pty Ltd
      Mastering MFC Fundamentals 2004 Microsoft

      Skills
      CAD/CAM - Fluent in Solidworks & Siemens NX
      FEA - MSC Nastran in NX. Composites laminate analysis and optimization in NX.
      Software - C++, C, C#, Java, SQL

      References
      Available upon request

      • it's ok to contact this poster if you are a potential employer or other principal
      • Principals only. Recruiters, please don't contact this job seeker.
      • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests





      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 157 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/9/2009
      Subject: AWE Classified Ads AWE
      Announcement:

      New page:

      AWE Classified Ads AWE

      http://www.energykitesystems.net/classifiedads/index.html

      Launching is just a beginning ...
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 158 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/13/2009
      Subject: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE
      Model Uncertainty characterized initial AWE research. All kinds of pet schemes emerged & one popular mantra was "high altitude" wind power, a prejudice based on the greater power higher up the wind gradient with altitude.
       
      Gradually the severity of problems with high altitude AWE became clear. A longer tether is more uncertain, it must be designed heavier for equivalent reliability. Direct control thru a longer tether is sluggish & less reliable due to a greater requirement to anticipate input. Adding actuation aloft adds weight, cost, & failure modes.
       
      Flying higher puts the kites into ever more airspace & greater competition with other aviation. Sure you can high-fly the Sahara or Southern Oceans, but US or European airspace will be dicey. A high flown runaway can cover a lot of ground. You never want to see a monster tether come down on a busy highway or drag a building over. Gaining airworthyness certification will be hard.
       
      A higher kite has greater scope & must be spaced farther from its neighbor. The scope required with height grows faster than the wind speed advantage; bummer! KiteLab's passive-control semi-captive arrays work around this problem, but Makani seems committed to keeping a bunch of non-captive wings clear of each other by active-control.
       
      High flying means visibility is a major issue. One cannot fly in clouds/fog without FAA instrument certifications (IFR capability), a far steeper avionics requirement.
       
      Risky AWE schemes to fly the generator require a heavy conductor tether. Aluminum is the best conductor by price & weight & can even carry considerable loads, but don't heat it up. Required insulation is more weight & drag. Go high & electrical issues compound core uncertainty.
       
      Thus have many AWE startups been chasing their own tail ever higher. Sky WIndPower has languished pining for the stratosphere. Makani has quietly downsized its height ambitions without admitting it ever miscalculated.
       
      Low is Beautiful.
       
      There is a turbulent surface layer that kites must clear but, as Payne pointed out, its only about 50-75 feet in normal winds. Above the surface layer an AWE sweet-zone begins & extends upwards a short ways, then uncertainty issues with height take over. The FAA allows anyone, even children, to fly low mass kite systems in a safe manner up to 150 feet without all the complex expensive restrictions & airworthiness requirements of conventional aviation. That's actually pretty high for an experimenter & there is a lot of power there (a few terrawatts) if you are not too greedy.
       
      Low altitude is the Bunny Slope for AWE where competence can develop & eventually enable practical high altitude methods.

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 159 From: christopher carlin Date: 6/13/2009
      Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE
      Dear Dave,

      I agree. KISS applies particularly in the early days of new technology applications.

      By the way from some aerospace experience I have a kite at 60,000 feet would have the potential if it's tether broke of coming down within a couple hundred mile radius. Could be exciting. Also Aluminum has lousy fatigue properties. Using it as a tether without say Kevlar reinforcement doesn't seem a good idea to me.

      Regards,

      Chris
      On Jun 13, 2009, at 5:54 PM, santos137@yahoo.com wrote:


      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 160 From: harry valentine Date: 6/13/2009
      Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE
      California restricts windmill towers in residential areas to an elevation of 30-feet (thirty). Allowing kites to fly at 150-feet is a definate improvement as it can allow for kite-based wind energy technology to access the higher velocity winds that blow at even that low altitude.
       
       
      Harry

      To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
      From: santos137@yahoo.com
      Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:54:40 -0700
      Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] Low is Beautiful- Altitude & AWE



      Model Uncertainty characterized initial AWE research. All kinds of pet schemes emerged & one popular mantra was "high altitude" wind power, a prejudice based on the greater power higher up the wind gradient with altitude.
       
      Gradually the severity of problems with high altitude AWE became clear. A longer tether is more uncertain, it must be designed heavier for equivalent reliability. Direct control thru a longer tether is sluggish & less reliable due to a greater requirement to anticipate input. Adding actuation aloft adds weight, cost, & failure modes.
       
      Flying higher puts the kites into ever more airspace & greater competition with other aviation. Sure you can high-fly the Sahara or Southern Oceans, but US or European airspace will be dicey. A high flown runaway can cover a lot of ground. You never want to see a monster tether come down on a busy highway or drag a building over. Gaining airworthyness certification will be hard.
       
      A higher kite has greater scope & must be spaced farther from its neighbor. The scope required with height grows faster than the wind speed advantage; bummer! KiteLab's passive-control semi-captive arrays work around this problem, but Makani seems committed to keeping a bunch of non-captive wings clear of each other by active-control.
       
      High flying means visibility is a major issue. One cannot fly in clouds/fog without FAA instrument certifications (IFR capability), a far steeper avionics requirement.
       
      Risky AWE schemes to fly the generator require a heavy conductor tether. Aluminum is the best conductor by price & weight & can even carry considerable loads, but don't heat it up. Required insulation is more weight & drag. Go high & electrical issues compound core uncertainty.
       
      Thus have many AWE startups been chasing their own tail ever higher. Sky WIndPower has languished pining for the stratosphere. Makani has quietly downsized its height ambitions without admitting it ever miscalculated.
       
      Low is Beautiful.
       
      There is a turbulent surface layer that kites must clear but, as Payne pointed out, its only about 50-75 feet in normal winds. Above the surface layer an AWE sweet-zone begins & extends upwards a short ways, then uncertainty issues with height take over. The FAA allows anyone, even children, to fly low mass kite systems in a safe manner up to 150 feet without all the complex expensive restrictions & airworthiness requirements of conventional aviation. That's actually pretty high for an experimenter & there is a lot of power there (a few terrawatts) if you are not too greedy.
       
      Low altitude is the Bunny Slope for AWE where competence can develop & eventually enable practical high altitude methods.




      Windows Live helps you keep up with all your friends, in one place.
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 161 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/14/2009
      Subject: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality

      For 2 years KiteLab has insisted that Makani badly miscalculated its altitude targets. KiteLab's pointed critique, "The Stratosphere is a Harsh Mistress", was circulated to company operatives & its message slowly sunk in. Makani is now aiming 90% lower.

      Stay tuned for a continued pattern of the well funded but poorly staffed stealth company belatedly following the lead of superior Open IP thinking, but without opening its culture or admitting any shortcomings.

      Saturday, June 13, 2009

      Google Backed Kite Maker Makani Retools For Lower Altitude Kite Flying


      Makani Power has been working largely in stealth for several years, developing huge wing-shaped kites to generate power from the strong winds exhaled miles above the earth’s surface.

      But recently, the company has begun to redefine itself for low-altitude flying – retooling to be what it describes as a “high capacity” company instead of a “high-altitude” one.

      Details were scarce during an appearance by CTO Corwin Hardham at the OPENforum 2009 conference in Mountain View on Saturday.

      But he said the Alameda startup that received $5 million from Google in 2008 no longer feels it has to fly its kites at high altitudes to successfully generate substantial energy from the wind.

      The new target: a couple of hundred meters to a kilometer. Makani had previously anticipated its kites would fly at 10 kilometers, or about 6 miles, above the earth.

      Hardham declined to explain why the company made the change. He said details of its progress are to be unveiled in articles planned for Wired and Nature in the next couple months.

      But he said the company continues to make gains on the efficiency of its kites and anticipates having products available in four or five years. For instance, it has developed higher performing airfoils.

      Nevertheless, significant breakthroughs remain in front of Makani as it tries to bring its technology dream to life.

      “We’re developing a whole new technology,” he said. Makani anticipates the cost of its power will be less than electricity generated from fossil fuels.

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 162 From: harry valentine Date: 6/14/2009
      Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality
      How is SkyWindPower and the LadderMill group dealing with high-altitude operation?
       
      Harry

      To: airbornewindenergy@yahoogroups.com
      From: santos137@yahoo.com
      Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:02:54 -0700
      Subject: [AirborneWindEnergy] Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality



      For 2 years KiteLab has insisted that Makani badly miscalculated its altitude targets. KiteLab's pointed critique, "The Stratosphere is a Harsh Mistress", was circulated to company operatives & its message slowly sunk in. Makani is now aiming 90% lower.

      Stay tuned for a continued pattern of the well funded but poorly staffed stealth company belatedly following the lead of superior Open IP thinking, but without opening its culture or admitting any shortcomings.

      Saturday, June 13, 2009

      Google Backed Kite Maker Makani Retools For Lower Altitude Kite Flying


      Makani Power has been working largely in stealth for several years, developing huge wing-shaped kites to generate power from the strong winds exhaled miles above the earth’s surface.

      But recently, the company has begun to redefine itself for low-altitude flying – retooling to be what it describes as a “high capacity” company instead of a “high-altitude” one.

      Details were scarce during an appearance by CTO Corwin Hardham at the OPENforum 2009 conference in Mountain View on Saturday.

      But he said the Alameda startup that received $5 million from Google in 2008 no longer feels it has to fly its kites at high altitudes to successfully generate substantial energy from the wind.

      The new target: a couple of hundred meters to a kilometer. Makani had previously anticipated its kites would fly at 10 kilometers, or about 6 miles, above the earth.

      Hardham declined to explain why the company made the change. He said details of its progress are to be unveiled in articles planned for Wired and Nature in the next couple months.

      But he said the company continues to make gains on the efficiency of its kites and anticipates having products available in four or five years. For instance, it has developed higher performing airfoils.

      Nevertheless, significant breakthroughs remain in front of Makani as it tries to bring its technology dream to life.

      “We’re developing a whole new technology,” he said. Makani anticipates the cost of its power will be less than electricity generated from fossil fuels.



      Create a cool, new character for your Windows Live™ Messenger. Check it out
      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 163 From: Joe Faust Date: 6/14/2009
      Subject: Re: Low is Beautiful- Makani forced lower by reality

      The following article had not caught up with the change to lower altitude:
       Google Inc Nearer Goal of Renewable Energy Cheaper Than Coal  

      (Makani Power, Inc. mentioned at still "high altitude.")

       

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 164 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/15/2009
      Subject: AWE Patent/IP Pool
       
      An AWE Patent/IP Pool has a strong historic precedent. Tom Crouch in Wings; A History of Aviation; From Kites to the Space Age, explains how a Patent Pool allowed a fearful & stagnant early aviation industry to flourish. A Patent Pool was also proposed by aviation legend Paul MacCready, at a 2006 Drachen Foundation Conference, as a key precondition to intensive AWE development.
       
      Patent buy-out protects small IP holders from uncertainty, most of whom can not afford to swat common pirates, much wage less epic patent battles against deep-pocket players like Google-backed Makani. IP released to the public domain encourages developers to field solutions without regard for predatory "IP trolling" culture.
       
      Relatively small offers would entice most smallholders to release IP rights. In particular, the dozen or so central AWE patents (& misc. IP) are easily affordable by Google.org long before any governmental player can mobilize a Pool. Google.org can also easily create an explosion of Open Source AWE by a broadening its narrow initial investment.
       
      If developing alternatives to fossil fuel is urgent, the wisest course is to free up AWE IP as soon as possible.
       

      Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 165 From: santos137@yahoo.com Date: 6/23/2009
      Subject: Latest Best Practice AWE
      Attachments :
        "Standard" AWE Solution Proven
         
        Recently JoeF proposed a standard AWE design be developed that anyone anywhere could cobble together. It had to be safe, simple, cheap, & effective.
         
        Today at sunset over the NW Pacific a tripod tether was robustly driven by a cheap X-Kite DC 60 sport kite lifted by a Premier 14 morse sled. Strong rotary power at the ground centerpoint of the tripod was produced. The simple kit was completed by some strings, 3 Gomberg mini fabric sand anchors to define the tripod feet, 3 Ronstan pulleys as corner blocks, & two heavy fishing swivels. Its all COTS, about 100 bucks worth for around 30 watts of power in the ~12 knot breeze, with a potential of maybe 100 watts peak in more wind.
         
        Notes
         
        This concept is Passive Control AWE, no fancy avionics required.
         
        The generator or other workcell stays on the ground, minimal mass aloft, high safety factor, low capital risk.
         
        Capital Cost Intensity could hardly be lower, except for DIY from salvage & scrap.
          
        Quality swivels & pulleys are desirable, but much cheaper than the massive turrets & levers, large tracks & such of other AWE schemes.
         
        The looping wing stops spinning in a dying breeze before landing & the morse sled self-relaunches after calm. Tangle/snag potential is quite low.
         
        The tripod-tether accepts input from any direction. Various tuning inputs can enhance performance, but the system is so robust such frills are unnecessary.
         
        The legs of the tripod drive an orbiting centerpoint in by three-phase rotation, perfect for turning a crank, but also will direct-drive a reciprocating load.
         
        The initial load was a small log that promptly plowed a deep oval rut into the sand. Various test loads are next. A DeProny brake is being made from a geared crank driven grinder to measure absolute shaft-power. Geared generators will be simple crank driven by the string input, but a triple sprag or triple crank shaft may be favored in some set-ups.
         
        The looping wing's mass acts like a flywheel input to the tripod-tether, elegant torque transmission by mere string.
         
        Hot tethered foils far exceed the L/D performance of the cheap DC-60 sport kite. A Rev Super Blast under an HQ 9.0 XXL Power Sled would be a sweet kilowatt scale COTS system. The core concept is mainly scale limited by the lifter. A 5000 sq ft KiteShip OL kite can be stabilized for the role for a megawatt scale implementation. Massed arrays of these units could easily exceed a gigawatt. They can be meshed together for higher airspace density. 
         
        Sadly, the video camera was left behind today; refer to the attached sketch for geometric clarification & the video will catch up soon.

          @@attachment@@
        Group: AirborneWindEnergy Message: 166 From: dave santos Date: 6/26/2009
        Subject: Tripod Tether COTS AWE Demo
        Attachments :
        Hi folks,
         
        Attached is a video clip of the looping sport-kite under a lifter-sled driving a tripod-tether linked to a hand-cranked generator. The video might have been better but the camera batteries died.
         
        The attached  jpeg shows the entire kit. Starting clockwise from the top- (1) cheap X-kite sport-kite, (2) cheap Premier 14 sled, (3) tripod-tether lines & pulleys, (4) tripod mount for the (5) hand-cranked generator, (6) tuning sheets, (7) sand anchors, (8) plastic sand trowel.
         
        A much more powerful version of this concept is underway....
         
        daveS
         
         
         
         

          @@attachment@@